Fig. 1. Outline illustration of the review of SCHEHs.
Fig. 2. Photovoltaic effect-based energy harvester. (
a) Schematic illustration of the photovoltaic effect-based energy harvester
44. (
b) Simplified scheme presenting the Cl-containing alloy-mediated sequential vacuum deposition approach
65. (
c) Schematic architecture of the flexible OSCs (left),
J-V curves of a typical single-junction device (D1:A1) based on FlexAgNEs and ITO glass electrodes (middle),
J-V curves of a typical tandem device (D2:A2/D1:A1:A4) based on FlexAgNEs and ITO electrodes (right)
66. (
d) Scheme of the solution ligand exchange process
67. (
e) Schematic diagram of perovskite/SHJ tandem solar cell
69. (
f) Maximum power point tracking of encapsulated tandem solar cells in air. Inset is the photograph of the encapsulated device
69. (
g) Schematic overview of the MAPHEUS-8 sounding rocket flight. Inset is the different illumination states
70. (
h) Scatter plot showing the
Jsc evolution and flight-altitude (black line) during micro-gravity
70. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
44, Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons; (b) ref.
65, Copyright © 2022 AAAS; (c) ref.
66, Copyright © 2019 Springer Nature; (d) ref.
67, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (e, f) ref.
69, Copyright © 2023 John Wiley and Sons. (g, h) ref.
70, Copyright © 2020 Elsevier.
Fig. 3. Triboelectric effect-based energy harvester. (
a) Schematic illustration of the triboelectric effect-based nanogenerator
44. (
b) Variation of current and power of the TENG-flag with external load resistances and the output performances of the TENG-flag (the woven unit is 1.5 × 1.5 cm
2, and the degree of tightness is 1.09) at a 22 m s
-1 wind speed
78. (
c) Voltage profiles of the button battery charged by TENG-flag and galvanostatically discharged at 1 μA
78. (
d) Schematic diagram of the spherical TENG with spring-assisted multilayered structure floating on water, and schematic representation enlarged structure for the zigzag multilayered TENG with five basic units
79. (
e) Schematic diagram of the folded elastic strip-based TENG
80. (
f) Schematic diagram (left) and photographs (middle) of the wearable all-fiber TENG, as well as hundreds of LEDs powered by the TENG
81. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
44, Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons; (b, c) ref.
78, Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society; (d) ref.
79, Copyright © 2018 John Wiley and Sons; (e) ref.
80, Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society; (f) ref.
81, Copyright © 2015 Elsevier.
Fig. 4. Piezoelectric effect-based energy harvester. (
a) Schematic illustration of the piezoelectric effect-based nanogenerator
44. (
b) Schematic structure (left), output voltage (middle), and output current (right) of the lateral-nanowire-array integrated nanogenerator
85. (
c) Schematic diagram of the fabrication process (left) and the photograph (right) of a high-efficient, flexible, and large-area PZT thin film-based NG using the LLO method
86. (
d) Schematic images (left and middle) and the corresponding output voltage (right) of the flexible nanogenerator under the finger movement
87. (
e) Fabrication process (left), SEM image (top), and output current (bottom) of the piezoelectric PVDF nanogenerator
88. (
f) SEM image and the schematic structure of the PZT-PDMS energy harvester
89. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
44, Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons; (b) ref.
85, Copyright © 2010 Springer Nature; (c) ref.
86, Copyright © 2014 John Wiley and Sons. (d) ref.
87, Copyright © 2015 Elsevier. (e) ref.
88, Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society. (f) ref.
89, Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5. Thermoelectric effect-based energy harvester. (
a) Schematic illustration of the thermoelectric effect-based generator
44. (
b) Practical TE generators connecting large numbers of junctions in series to increase operating voltage and spread heat flow
23. (
c) Honda prototype TEG exhaust heat recovery system
97. (
d) Schematic illustration (left) and photographs (right) of the complete TEG device on pipe
98. (
e) Structure of the proposed lateral Y type FTEGs
101. (
f) Practical applications of the fabricated dual-functional sensor as electronic skins
103. (
g) Sketch of the sample preparation of a solution-processable all-polymer TEG
110. (
h) Performances (left), as well as photographs of the undoped (top) and 40 wt% doped (bottom) thin-film TEGs
110. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
44, Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons; (b) ref.
23, Copyright © 2008 AAAS; (c) ref.
97, Copyright © 2016 Elsevier; (d) ref.
98, Copyright © 2017 Elsevier; (e) ref.
101, Copyright © 2018 Elsevier. (f) ref.
103, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (g, h) ref.
110, Copyright © 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 6. SCHEHs based on solar cell and triboelectric nanogenerator. (
a) Schematic illustration and the photograph of the hybrid energy harvester
112. (
b) Architecture of the hybrid TENG/Si tandem solar cell
113. (
c) Schematic illustration of the flexible hybrid energy harvesting system
114. (
d) Scheme of the configuration of the TENG fabrics and the fiber-shaped dye-sensitized solar cell (top), as well as output current of the hybrid energy-harvesting device
115. (
e) Schematic illustration (left) and the working principle (right) of the raindrop-solar hybrid energy harvester with embedded charge-storage layer
116. (
f) Photographs and the schematic illustration of the synergistic solar and raindrop hybrid energy harvester
117. (
g) Schematic diagram of the multifunctional hybrid device
118. (
h) Schematic illustration of the self-powered environmental visualized system (left), and alterable colored LED showing different light at different environment (right)
118. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
112, Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society; (b) ref.
113, Copyright © 2021 Elsevier; (c) ref.
114, Copyright © 2020 Elsevier. (d) ref.
115, Copyright © 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (e) ref.
116, Copyright © 2022 Elsevier; (f) ref.
117, Copyright © 2022 Elsevier; (g, h) ref.
118, Copyright © 2021 Elsevier.
Fig. 7. SCHEHs based on solar cell and piezoelectric nanogenerator. (
a) Schematic structure of a serially integrated hybrid cell
119. (
b) Schematic illustration of a compact hybrid cell
120. (
c) Schematic illustration (left) and the photograph (right) of the tree shaped hybrid nanogenerator
121. (
d) Output voltage of the hybrid cell when the pressure is applied periodically at an interval of 3.0 s for an extended period of 1.0 s
122. (
e) Schematic illustration of a composite photovoltaic/PENG film
123. (
f) Output performance (left) and schematic illustration (middle and right) of the hybrid device with the bending instrument
124. (
g) Experimental configuration of the parallel hybrid power system
125. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
119, Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society; (b) ref.
120, Copyright © 2011 John Wiley and Sons; (c) ref.
121, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (d) ref.
122, Copyright © 2015 Elsevier; (e) ref.
123, Copyright © 2020 Springer Nature; (f) ref.
124, Copyright © 2022 Springer Nature; (g) ref.
125, Copyright © 2021 Springer Nature.
Fig. 8. SCHEHs based on solar cell and thermoelectric generator. (
a) Schematic of the PV-TE hybrid power system
128. (
b) Hybrid system efficiency vs. cutoff wavelength for different concentration ratio (
h = 10000 W/m
2 K
-1)
127. (
c) Comparison of the efficiency between the PV-only system and the PV-TE hybrid system
127. (
d) Schematic illustration of the hybrid generation system
129. (
e) Schematic illustration (left), and electron energy band diagram of the PSC-TE hybrid device
130. (
f) Schematic cross section of ZnO nanowires/CIGS solar cell connected to the thermoelectric generator
131. (
g) Schematic illustration of the photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid device (left), and best performed J-V curves (symbol-line) and output power (dash-line) of the PSC/TE hybrid devices tested with the assisted cooling system or not (right)
132. ref.
132, Copyright © 2017 Elsevier. (
h) Non-contact reflection geometry (left), non-contact transmission geometry (middle), and contact transmission geometry (right)
134. (
i) Calculated TEG efficiencies for the PV-TEG hybrid system in the three different geometries
134. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.
128, Copyright © 2014 Elsevier; (b, c) ref.
127, Copyright © 2012 Elsevier; (d) ref.
129, Copyright © 2013 Elsevier; (e) ref.
130, Copyright © 2018 John Wiley and Sons; (f) ref.
131, Copyright © 2015 John Wiley and Sons; (g–i) ref.
134, Copyright © 2021 Royal Society of Chemistry.
| Pros | Cons | SC-TENG | High output voltage
long lifetime
low cost
Easy fabrication
Wide-frequency bandwidth
| High impedance
Low output current
| SC-PENG | Tight integration
Low weight
Simple structure
| Low output power and current
Lab-scale applications
High efficiency in high-frequency
| SC-TEG | High output power and current
Wide compatibility
DC outputs
No external mechanical energy sources needed (natural heat generation)
| Low output voltage
Structure complexity
Weather limitations
|
|
Table 1. Comparison of the different types of SCHEHs.