Author Affiliations
1 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Materials Laser Processing and Modification, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China2 No. 92730 Chinese People's Liberation Army, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China3 Shanghai Da Lu Laser Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201306, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Morphology of aluminum bronze coating. (a) Overall; (b) upper region; (c) middle region; (d) bottom region
Fig. 2. Microstructure and element distribution in upper region of aluminum bronze coating. (a) Microstructure; (b) Cu; (c) Al; (d) Fe
Fig. 3. Magnified Fe-rich morphology
Fig. 4. XRD pattern of aluminum bronze coating surface
Fig. 5. SEM morphology of copper contamination and EDS analysis results of element distribution. (a) Copper contamination morphology; (b) #1 spot; (c) #2 spot; (d) #3 spot
Fig. 6. Schematic of wetting between α-phase grain boundary and molten β-phase
Fig. 7. Morphology of fusion zone and average depth of copper contamination under different laser parameters. (a) P=4 kW, s=4 mm·s-1, Q=12.5 g·min-1; (b) P=4 kW, s=3 mm·s-1, Q=12.5 g·min-1; (c) P=4 kW, s=2 mm·s-1, Q=12.5 g·min-1; (d) P=3.5 kW, s=2 mm·s-1, Q=12.5 g·min-1; (e) P=4.5 kW, s=2 mm·s-1, Q=12.5 g·min-1; (f) P=4 kW, s=2 mm·s-1, Q=15 g·min-1; (g) P=4 kW, s=2 mm·s-1, Q=10 g·min-1
Fig. 8. Width of fusion zone and average depth of copper contamination versus different process parameters. (a) Laser power; (b) scanning speed; (c) powder feeding rate
Fig. 9. Schematic of microstructure evolution and copper contamination under thermal cycle of laser cladding
Material | Element |
---|
Fe | C | Mn | Si | S | P |
---|
Q235 base metal | Bal. | 0.14-0.22 | 0.30-0.65 | ≤0.30 | ≤0.050 | 0.045 |
|
Table 1. Chemical compositions of Q235 base metal (mass fraction, %)
Material | Element |
---|
Cu | Al | Fe | Ni | O |
---|
Aluminium bronze powder | Bal. | 7.48 | 0.81 | 0.06 | <0.03 |
|
Table 2. Chemical compositions of aluminum bronze powder (mass fraction, %)
Spot | Element |
---|
Cu | Al | Fe | Mn |
---|
#1 | 85.9 | 8.3 | 5.4 | 0.4 | #2 | 12.1 | 7.5 | 79.8 | 0.6 |
|
Table 3. EDS analysis results of Cu-rich phase and Fe-rich phase (mass fraction,%)