Author Affiliations
1School of Communication and Information Engineering, Xi′an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710121, China2School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710072, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Relationship between extinction coefficient and rainfall intensity
Fig. 2. Attenuation coefficient of satellite-ground link versus attenuation distance and rainfall intensity
Fig. 3. Channel capacity versus rainfall intensity and
Fig. 4. Channel capacity of bit-flip channel versus attenuation distance and rainfall intensity
Fig. 5. Channel capacity of depolarized channel versus attenuation distance and rainfall intensity
Fig. 6. Channel capacity of amplitude damping channel versus attenuation distance and rainfall intensity
Fig. 7. Channel capacity of fusion channel versus attenuation distance and rainfall intensity
Fig. 8. Average fidelity of fusion channel versus and
Fig. 9. Average fidelity of bit-flip channel versus p1 and rainfall intensity
Fig. 10. Average fidelity of depolarized channel versus p1 and rainfall intensity
Fig. 11. Average fidelity of amplitude damping channel versus p1 and rainfall intensity
Fig. 12. Average fidelity of fusion channel versus p0 and rainfall intensity
Fig. 13. Schematic of teleportation of satellite-ground quantum links
Fig. 14. Concurrence on amplitude damping channel
Fig. 15. Fidelity on amplitude damping channel
Fig. 16. Damping coefficient versus rainfall intensity
Grade | Light-moderate rain | Moderate-heavy rain | Rainstorm |
---|
Rainfall /(mm·h-1) | [0.41,1.04) | [1.04,2.04] | (2.04,+∞) |
|
Table 1. Grade classification of rainfall intensity
Classical bit string | Unitary transformation for articles 4 and 5 |
---|
000 | | 001 | | 100 | | 101 | | 010 | | 011 | | 110 | | 111 | |
|
Table 2. Unitary transformation of teleportation states