Author Affiliations
Xiamen University, Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics, College of Physical Science and Technology, Department of Physics, Xiamen, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. q-HShPs based on vortex waves with different topological charges () as excitation sources of hyperbolic materials without off-diagonal permittivity tensor elements at . (a)–(c) The simulated magnetic fields of different topological charges. (d)–(f) The corresponding intensities () of different topological charges. (g)–(i) The corresponding FFT () of different topological charges.
Fig. 2. Analytical results of q-HShPs based on the vortex with different topological charges () as excitation sources of hyperbolic materials without off-diagonal permittivity tensors at . (a)–(d) The analytical magnetic fields of positive topological charges. (e)–(h) The analytical magnetic fields of negative topological charges.
Fig. 3. Explanation of asymmetric q-HShPs in hyperbolic materials. (a) and (d) are the imaginary components of for , and , , respectively. (b) and (e) The corresponding magnetic fields of vortex waves () as excitation sources at . (c) and (f) The corresponding intensities of vortex waves () as excitation sources at .
Fig. 4. The critical symmetry transition between the left-skewed and right-skewed q-HShPs induced by the vortex waves at . (a) The symmetry transition for different topological charges and different scaling factors. (b)–(f) The corresponding symmetric magnetic fields (away from the source) for different topological charges () and different scaling factors () at , respectively.
Fig. 5. More distinct asymmetric q-HShPs for decreasing and increasing scaling factors induced by the vortex waves () at . (a)–(c) The magnetic fields of different scaling factors (). (d)–(f) The corresponding intensities () of different scaling factors ().