• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 12, Issue 1, 172 (2024)
Shengyang Wu1、2, Benli Yu1、2, and Lei Zhang1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Information Acquisition and Manipulation, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
  • 2Information Materials and Intelligent Sensing Laboratory of Anhui Province, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.498502 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shengyang Wu, Benli Yu, Lei Zhang. Mutual aid instead of mutual restraint: interactive probing for topological charge and phase of a vortex beam of large aberrations[J]. Photonics Research, 2024, 12(1): 172 Copy Citation Text show less
    Mutual restraining of TC determination and phase recovery in a vortex beam of aberrations, in which (a)–(d) are the effect of aberrations on TC measurements while (e) is the effect of TC on the aberration phase measurement. (a) Bifurcations of self-interference fringes, (b) conjugated vortex beam interference patterns, (c) triangular aperture diffraction patterns, (d) hollow intensity image from which TC is determined by deep learning, (e) phase unwrapping dilemma due to the phase jump aliasing in the vortex phase.
    Fig. 1. Mutual restraining of TC determination and phase recovery in a vortex beam of aberrations, in which (a)–(d) are the effect of aberrations on TC measurements while (e) is the effect of TC on the aberration phase measurement. (a) Bifurcations of self-interference fringes, (b) conjugated vortex beam interference patterns, (c) triangular aperture diffraction patterns, (d) hollow intensity image from which TC is determined by deep learning, (e) phase unwrapping dilemma due to the phase jump aliasing in the vortex phase.
    Principle of the interactive probing method. The system consists of a Twyman–Green interferometer and an annular radial shearing interferometer. The two interferometers capture the purified interferogram and radial shearing interferogram, respectively. The RCP and LCP beams before the P-cameras in the two interferometers are designed to meet the synchronous phase shift condition. The aberration phase extracted from the shearing interferogram is used to generate a virtual interferogram. The Moiré probes then can be extracted from the product of the purified interferogram and virtual interferogram.
    Fig. 2. Principle of the interactive probing method. The system consists of a Twyman–Green interferometer and an annular radial shearing interferometer. The two interferometers capture the purified interferogram and radial shearing interferogram, respectively. The RCP and LCP beams before the P-cameras in the two interferometers are designed to meet the synchronous phase shift condition. The aberration phase extracted from the shearing interferogram is used to generate a virtual interferogram. The Moiré probes then can be extracted from the product of the purified interferogram and virtual interferogram.
    Phase recovery and TC determination results with increasing incident aberrations. (a) Incident vortex phases with aberrations, (b) direct interferograms with the carrier, (c) shearing interferograms, (d) recovered phases and recovered errors, (e) Moiré probes, (f) far-field spots, (g) triangular aperture diffraction spots, (h) conjugated interference petals.
    Fig. 3. Phase recovery and TC determination results with increasing incident aberrations. (a) Incident vortex phases with aberrations, (b) direct interferograms with the carrier, (c) shearing interferograms, (d) recovered phases and recovered errors, (e) Moiré probes, (f) far-field spots, (g) triangular aperture diffraction spots, (h) conjugated interference petals.
    Simulation results of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of |l|=1,5,10,20 with different aberration types. (a) Real vortex phases with aberrations (φ+lθ), (b) purified interferograms (Ip) with carrier phase, (c) shearing interferograms (Is), (d) recovered phases (φ) referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms (Iv) with carrier phase, (f) Moiré fringes (IM), (g) Moiré probes, (h) recovered vortex phase (φ+lθ), (i) recovered phase error.
    Fig. 4. Simulation results of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of |l|=1,5,10,20 with different aberration types. (a) Real vortex phases with aberrations (φ+lθ), (b) purified interferograms (Ip) with carrier phase, (c) shearing interferograms (Is), (d) recovered phases (φ) referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms (Iv) with carrier phase, (f) Moiré fringes (IM), (g) Moiré probes, (h) recovered vortex phase (φ+lθ), (i) recovered phase error.
    Sign determination of TC. These pictures are the keyframes of Visualization 3 showing the obvious rotation.
    Fig. 5. Sign determination of TC. These pictures are the keyframes of Visualization 3 showing the obvious rotation.
    Determination of the fractional TC with a camera of one megapixel. (a) Probes with TC between 6 and 7 spaced 0.1 apart, (b) GS curves which indicate the split process of corresponding TC probes. (c) Δα and accordingly calculated l, (d) error of TC estimation.
    Fig. 6. Determination of the fractional TC with a camera of one megapixel. (a) Probes with TC between 6 and 7 spaced 0.1 apart, (b) GS curves which indicate the split process of corresponding TC probes. (c) Δα and accordingly calculated l, (d) error of TC estimation.
    TC resolution analysis with a one-megapixel camera. (a) TC resolution variations with the increasing TC number, (b) error performance of TC determination in the cases of l=3–4,10–11,20–21. (c) Absolute values of the errors in the three cases.
    Fig. 7. TC resolution analysis with a one-megapixel camera. (a) TC resolution variations with the increasing TC number, (b) error performance of TC determination in the cases of l=34,1011,2021. (c) Absolute values of the errors in the three cases.
    Simulation of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of misalignment and phase recovery error. (a) Incident vortex phases with exocentric singularity, (b) purified interferogram, (c) shearing interferogram, (d) recovered phase referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms, (f) Moiré fringes, (g) Moiré probes, (h) TC determination error due to 1% phase recovery error in the cases of different beam aberrations and TC.
    Fig. 8. Simulation of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of misalignment and phase recovery error. (a) Incident vortex phases with exocentric singularity, (b) purified interferogram, (c) shearing interferogram, (d) recovered phase referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms, (f) Moiré fringes, (g) Moiré probes, (h) TC determination error due to 1% phase recovery error in the cases of different beam aberrations and TC.
    Verification experimental setup.
    Fig. 9. Verification experimental setup.
    Comparative experiment results with different aberrations in different methods. Each set of three images corresponds to the cases of three different aberrations. (a) Triangular aperture diffraction spots, (b) far-field spots, (c) conjugated interference petals, (d) Moiré probes.
    Fig. 10. Comparative experiment results with different aberrations in different methods. Each set of three images corresponds to the cases of three different aberrations. (a) Triangular aperture diffraction spots, (b) far-field spots, (c) conjugated interference petals, (d) Moiré probes.
    Experiment results of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of l=2,6,−10,15 with different aberrations. (a) Real aberration phases, (b) direct interferograms with carrier phases captured by P-camera 1, (c) shearing interferograms captured by P-camera 2, (d) recovered phases referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms, (f) Moiré fringes, (g) Moiré probes, (h) GS curves.
    Fig. 11. Experiment results of TC determination and phase recovery in the case of l=2,6,10,15 with different aberrations. (a) Real aberration phases, (b) direct interferograms with carrier phases captured by P-camera 1, (c) shearing interferograms captured by P-camera 2, (d) recovered phases referring to aberrations, (e) virtual interferograms, (f) Moiré fringes, (g) Moiré probes, (h) GS curves.
    Determination results of the TC number from 3.1 to 4 with 0.1 space.
    Fig. 12. Determination results of the TC number from 3.1 to 4 with 0.1 space.
    Real l6.16.26.36.46.56.66.76.86.97
    Δα4.0110.0317.0522.0828.0933.1038.1142.1147.1252.12
    l6.0786.1956.3326.4296.5466.6446.7416.8196.9166.999
    Error−0.022−0.0050.0320.0290.0460.0440.0410.0190.016−0.001
    Table 1. Determination Results of the Fractional Part of Topological Charge with a Camera of One Megapixel
    Real l26−1015
    Phase recovery resultsPV (λ)rms (λ)PV (λ)rms (λ)PV (λ)rms (λ)PV (λ)rms (λ)
    Real phase8.201.0022.003.5018.002.8015.002.50
    Recovered phase8.411.0122.693.4617.512.8215.422.51
    Measurement of lMeasured l2.0246.061−10.07115.073
    Error of l0.0240.061−0.0710.073
    Table 2. Experiment Results of Phase Recovery and TC Determination
    Real TC3.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.0
    Δα10.0325.0733.1140.1251.1460.1668.1674.1784.2840.11
    Measured l3.1143.2793.3683.4463.5683.6683.7573.8243.9363.999
    Error of l0.0140.0790.0680.0460.0680.0680.0570.0240.0360.001
    Table 3. Experiment Results of Fractional TC Determination
    Shengyang Wu, Benli Yu, Lei Zhang. Mutual aid instead of mutual restraint: interactive probing for topological charge and phase of a vortex beam of large aberrations[J]. Photonics Research, 2024, 12(1): 172
    Download Citation