Author Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Pose measurement system
Fig. 2. Coding target design and object. (a) Coding primitive; (b) coding combination; (c) target object
Fig. 3. Flow chart of decoding algorithm
Fig. 4. Finding smallest rectangle
Fig. 5. Image backprojection correction model
Fig. 6. Measurement accuracy comparison between proposed holographic coding scheme and common coding scheme. (a) x direction; (b) y direction; (c) z direction
Fig. 7. Affine transformation correction and matching result with oblique 15° imaging. (a) Oblique 15° imaging; (b) affine transformation correction; (c) matching result
Fig. 8. Image backprojection correction and matching result with oblique 15° imaging. (a) Oblique 15° imaging; (b) image backprojection correction; (c) matching result
Fig. 9. Image backprojection correction and matching result with oblique 60° imaging. (a) Oblique 60° imaging; (b) image backprojection correction; (c) matching result
Fig. 10. Image backprojection correction, plane rotation determination and matching result with positive 83° imaging. (a) Positive 83° imaging; (b) image backprojection correction and plane rotation determination; (c) matching result
Imaging angle | γ /(°) | δ | Matching result |
---|
Oblique 3° | 0.25 | 0.21 | Success | Oblique 15° | 0.71 | 0.21 | Failure | Oblique 30° | 1.28 | 0.23 | Failure | Oblique 60° | 2.54 | 0.29 | Failure | Positive 83° | 83.21 | 0.23 | Success | Positive 191° | 191.28 | 0.23 | Success |
|
Table 1. Affine transformation correction processing data (partial)
Imaging angle | α /(°) | β /(°) | γ /(°) | δ | Matching result | t1 | t2 |
---|
Oblique 3° | 2.21 | 1.77 | 0.22 | 0.21 | Success | 2.04 | 0.43 | Oblique 15° | 14.29 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.21 | Success | 2.03 | 0.47 | Oblique 30° | 29.54 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.19 | Success | 2.33 | 0.43 | Oblique 60° | 59.52 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.11 | Success | 2.16 | 0.47 | Oblique 63° | 63.65 | 4.82 | 3.21 | 0.10 | Failure | 2.21 | 0.45 | Positive 83° | 0.29 | 1.13 | 83.23 | 0.24 | Success | 2.10 | 0.43 | Positive 191° | 0.16 | 1.29 | 191.29 | 0.24 | Success | 2.06 | 0.47 |
|
Table 2. Image backprojection correction processing data (partial)