Author Affiliations
Institute of Information Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Wavelet bases of wavelet transform. (a) db10; (b) sym4
Fig. 2. Comparison of phase retrieval results (PSNR,SSIM) of different algorithms when
RSNR
=15 dB. (a) WF (13.28 dB,0.08); (b) DOLPHIn (27.13 dB,0.65); (c) BM3D-PRGAMP (29.13 dB, 0.80); (d) PRWATV (30.82 dB, 0.83)
Fig. 3. Partial information comparison of phase retrieval results of different algorithms when
RSNR
=15 dB. (a) WF; (b) DOLPHIn; (c) BM3D-PRGAMP; (d) PRWATV
Fig. 4. Comparison of phase retrieval results (PSNR, SSIM) of different algorithms when
RSNR
=15 dB. (a) TWF (13.10 dB, 0.11); (b) DOLPHIn (25.91 dB, 0.62); (c) SPAR (28.88 dB, 0.77); (d) PRWATV (28.68 dB, 0.76)
Threshold
algorithm | PSNR |
---|
RSNR
=20 dB | RSNR
=15 dB | RSNR
=10 dB |
---|
Soft | 28.72 | 26.55 | 24.16 | Hard | 29.67 | 27.08 | 24.34 | Group soft | 29.34 | 27.13 | 24.74 | Group hard | 30.57 | 28.05 | 25.40 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of PSNR obtained by phase retrieval experiments with different threshold algorithms dB
Regularization
term | PSNR |
---|
RSNR
=20 dB | RSNR
=15 dB | RSNR
=10 dB |
---|
db10 sparsity | 28.45 | 25.71 | 22.97 | sym4 sparsity | 28.21 | 25.63 | 22.99 | Total variation | 28.97 | 27.01 | 24.77 | db10 sparsity+
total variation | 30.17 | 27.72 | 25.15 | sym4 sparsity+
total variation | 30.04 | 27.67 | 25.13 | db10 sparsity+
sym4 sparsity | 30.06 | 27.36 | 24.67 | db10 sparsity+
sym4 sparsity+
total variation | 30.57 | 28.05 | 25.40 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of PSNR obtained by phase retrieval experiments with different regularization termsdB
Image | WF | DOLPHIn | BM3D-PRGAMP | PRWATV |
---|
Lena512 | 13.29 | 27.13 | 29.13 | 30.82 | Boat512 | 13.16 | 25.38 | 27.53 | 28.39 | Mandril512 | 13.73 | 20.40 | 25.42 | 26.36 | Barbara512 | 12.89 | 25.10 | 26.60 | 26.64 | Fingerprint512 | 12.49 | 22.50 | 24.85 | 25.74 | Cameraman256 | 12.15 | 24.51 | 27.00 | 27.54 | Peppers256 | 12.94 | 24.64 | 27.71 | 28.61 | House256 | 12.92 | 25.24 | 29.88 | 30.05 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of PSNR obtained by phase retrieval experiments with
RSNR
=15 dBdB
RSNR
/dB | Algorithm | 256 pixel×256 pixel | 512 pixel×512 pixel | |
---|
PSNR /dB | | Time /s | PSNR /dB | Time /s |
---|
20 | WF | 13.49 | 0.96 | 14.00 | 6.21 | DOLPHIn | 27.82 | 11.05 | 27.17 | 33.71 | BM3D-PRGAMP | 30.52 | 22.26 | 29.10 | 98.66 | PRWATV | 31.38 | 1.98 | 29.90 | 12.65 | 15 | WF | 12.67 | 0.91 | 13.11 | 6.07 | DOLPHIn | 27.82 | 9.95 | 24.10 | 29.02 | BM3D-PRGAMP | 28.20 | 47.89 | 26.70 | 197.04 | PRWATV | 28.73 | 2.12 | 27.59 | 12.58 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of average PSNR and running time obtained by phase retrieval experiments with different noise measurement values
RSNR
/dB | Algorithm | Lena512 | Boat512 | Cameraman256 | Peppers256 |
---|
PSNR /dB | Time /s | PSNR /dB | Time /s | PSNR /dB | Time /s | PSNR /dB | Time /s |
---|
20 | TWF | 14.10 | 7.37 | 14.06 | 7.21 | 12.71 | 1.76 | 13.80 | 1.72 | | | | | | | | | DOLPHIn | 29.38 | 21.00 | 27.52 | 20.84 | 26.55 | 8.01 | 27.55 | 7.85 | SPAR | 34.19 | 100.20 | 31.64 | 101.29 | 30.98 | 25.38 | 32.24 | 25.40 | PRWATV | 33.60 | 11.12 | 31.31 | 11.04 | 30.71 | 1.92 | 31.89 | 1.92 | 15 | TWF | 13.34 | 7.58 | 13.09 | 7.38 | 12.13 | 1.76 | 12.88 | 1.72 | | | | | | | | | DOLPHIn | 27.43 | 28.55 | 25.90 | 28.57 | 24.65 | 7.32 | 25.53 | 7.20 | SPAR | 31.37 | 101.38 | 28.88 | 100.92 | 27.85 | 25.87 | 29.12 | 25.77 | PRWATV | 30.97 | 11.24 | 28.68 | 11.34 | 27.82 | 1.66 | 28.79 | 1.66 |
|
Table 5. Comparison of PSNR and running time obtained by phase retrieval experiments with different noise