Fig. 1. Principle of 3D-STORM. (a) Optical path diagram of STORM; (b) PSF shape of a fluorophore at various z positions and calibration curves show x and y widths as functions of z (scale bar: 500 nm); (c) 3D localization distribution of single molecule fluorescence
Fig. 2. STORM images of four subcellular structures from Cos7 cell. (a) Mitochondria; (b) clathrin-coated pits; (c) microtubules; (d) microfilaments
Fig. 3. Drift correction of STORM images of tubulin and tropomodulin in x and y directions. (a) STORM images of Cos7 cell microtubule before and after drift correction; (b) STORM images of erythrocyte tropomodulin before and after drift correction; (c) drift correction curves of microtubule images in x and y directions; (d) drift correction curves of erythrocyte tropomodulin in x and y directions
Fig. 4. Images of the same subcellular structures using different sample preparation methods. (a)(b) Images of mitochondria of Cos7 cell labeled with different primary antibodies; (c) images of microtubule of Cos7 cell fixed with methanol; (d) images of microtubule of Cos7 cell fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde+0.1% glutaraldehyde
Fig. 5. Improvement of SMLM lateral resolution based on algorithms or hardware modifications. (a) Improvement of STORM lateral resolution by dual objective fluorescence collection system
[64]; (b) improvement of STORM lateral resolution by particle average algorithm
[65]; (c) improvement of lateral resolution by MINFLUX based on algorithm combined hardware modification
[14]; (d) improvement of lateral resolution by ROSE based on algorithm combined hardware modification
[66] Fig. 6. Improvement of SMLM axial resolution based on algorithms or hardware modifications. (a) Improvement of STORM axial resolution by dual objective fluorescence collection system
[64]; (b) improvement of axial resolution by dual objective fluorescence interferometric system
[71]; (c) improvement of DNA-PAINT axial resolution by developing new 3D fitting localization algorithm of PSF
[72]; (d) improvement of axial resolution by ROSE-Z based on algorithm and hardware modification
[73] Fig. 7. Imaging of SMLM in large field of view (FOV). (a) Enlargement of the FOV of STORM to 100 μm×100 μm by FIFI
[75]; (b) enlargement of the FOV of STORM to 221 μm×221 μm by multi-mode fiber
[76]; (c) STORM imaging in large FOV of 500 μm×500 μm based on chip
[77] Fig. 8. Enlargement of SMLM axial range based on PSF engineering and modification of excitation light source. (a) Enlargement of axial range by self bending PSF engineering
[81]; (b) enlargement of axial range by PSF engineering via tetrapod phase plate
[63]; (c) enlargement of axial range by using oblique-plane illuminating system
[85] Fig. 9. Confocal/spectrum-SMLM correlative imaging. (a) Confocal-STORM correlative imaging of junctophilin, ryanodine receptors, and cell membrane
[88]; (b) confocal-STORM correlative imaging of biocytin-filled axon terminals and cannabinoid receptor CB1
[89]; (c) heterogeneity of cell membrane revealed by spectrally resolved PAINT
[90]; (d) identification of surface adsorption layer of two-component mixture resolved by spectrally resolved PAINT
[91] Fig. 10. EM-SMLM correlative imaging. (a) Correlative imaging of mitochondria by EM and PALM (labeling TOM20 proteins)
[93]; (b) correlative imaging of cytoskeletons and mitochondria by EM and STORM (labeling microtubules and mitochondria)
[96]; (c) correlative imaging of FIB-SEM and SMLM for whole cells
[98] Fig. 11. AFM-SMLM correlative imaging. (a) AFM-STORM correlative imaging of Huntington protein aggregate
[99]; (b) AFM-STORM correlative imaging of paxillin and lamellipodia extension in live cell
[100]; (c) distributions of Na
+/K
+ATPase on membrane revealed by AFM-STORM correlative imaging
[101] Fig. 12. Principle and applications of Ripley’s K function. (a) Schematic diagram of Ripley’s K function
[108]; (b) Ripley’s K function reveals the clustering of SIRPα in activated human macrophage
[114]; (c) Ripley’s K function indicates cluster sizes of GLUT1 proteins on the apical/basal surface in Hela cells
[115] Fig. 13. Analysis results of pair correlation function. (a) Results of pair correlation function with random and clustered distributions
[116]; (b) pair correlation function analysis results of CD47 in young and old mouse erythrocytes
[120] Fig. 14. Applications of auto/cross-correlation analysis. (a) One-dimensional cross-correlation analysis of actin, C-terminal of spectrin, N-terminal of spectrin, and adducin in axons
[121]; (b) two-dimensional auto-correlation analysis of spectrin in the soma of neurons
[122]; (c) across-correlation analysis of N-terminal of spectrin and cross-correlation analysis of C-terminal and N-terminal of spectrin in human erythrocytes
[123] Fig. 15. Principle and applications of DBSCAN and FOCAL. (a) Principle of DBSCAN
[108]; (b) cluster analysis of tyrosine kinase in human and mouse platelets using DBSCAN
[127]; (c) principle of FOCAL
[128]; (d) cluster analysis of NPC in U2OS cells by FOCAL3D
[129] Fig. 16. Principle and applications of SR-Tesseler based on Voronoï diagram. (a) Principle of Voronoï diagram
[131]; (b) automatic segmentation of the uniform (left) and non-uniform (right) simulated images by SR-Tesseler
[131]; (c) segmentation of GluA1 SMLM image by SR-Tesseler
[131]; (d) cluster analysis of ROP6 SMLM image by SR-Tesseler
[132]; (e) cluster analysis of nuclear pore complex SMLM image by SR-Tesseler
[133] Fig. 17. Principle of DNA origami and identification of nanoclusters of membrane proteins. (a) Principle of DNA origami
[139]; (b) simulation images of random membrane proteins with gradually increased labeling density
[140]; (c) simulation images of clustered membrane proteins with gradually increased labeling density
[140]; (d) quantitative analysis of nanoclusters (duty ratio
η, cluster density
ρ, and their normalized curves)
[140] Fig. 18. Delicate cytoskeletal ultrastructures revealed by STORM. (a) Membrane-associated periodic skeleton in nerve axons revealed by STORM
[121]; (b) characteristics of membrane skeleton ultrastructure of erythrocyte under physiological conditions revealed by STORM
[123]; (c) disassembly characteristics of intermediate filaments revealed by STORM
[145] Fig. 19. Applications of SMLM in visualizing subcellular structures, membrane proteins, and intracellular organelles. (a) PALM maps the fine structure of focal adhesions with axial dimension
[148]; (b) STORM reconstructs the radial ninefold symmetry of centriole-containing complex
[149]; (c) STORM reveals the structures of the ESCRT-III complex during abscission of the intercellular bridge connecting two dividing cells
[150]; (d) nanoscale clustering of T cell receptor-mediated signaling complexs revealed by PALM
[151]; (e) Nanoscale clustering of ryanodine receptors revealed by STORM and PAINT
[155]; (f) 3D-STORM reveals the colocalization of purinosomes with mitochondria
[159] Fig. 20. Study on nanoscale diffusion rate of biomolecules in live cell by SMdM. (a) SMdM diffusivity map of free mEos3.2 in the cytoplasm of a live cell and correlated STORM image of the actin cytoskeleton
[164]; (b) 3D-PAINT and SMdM images of live cell membranes
[165] Type | Acquisition mode | Acquisition time | Cross-talk | Maximum multi-color ability | Image field | Target density | Resolution |
---|
Activator-reporter[30] | Simultaneous | Normal | High | 6 | Normal | Normal | Better | More excitation [57] | Sequential | Longer | Low | 2 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Split[58] | Simultaneous | Normal | High | 2 | Smaller | Normal | Better | Quenching[59] | Sequential | Longer | Low | 4 | Normal | Normal | Better | DNA-PAINT[60] | Sequential | Longer | Low | 10 | Normal | Normal | Better | Spectrum[61] | Simultaneous | Normal | Low | 4 | Smaller | Lower | Better | PSF engineering[63] | Simultaneous | Normal | Low | 2 | Smaller | Lower | Normal |
|
Table 1. Comparison of different multi-color SMLMs
Method of illumination | Field of view size /(μm×μm) | Resolution / nm | Objective | Illumination type | Camera | Frame rate /(frame·s-1) |
---|
FIFI[75] | 100×100 | 40 | 60×, NA=1.4, Nikon | Epi | sCMOS (Zyla 4.2, Andor) | 100 | Multimode fiber combiner[76] | 221×221 | 40 | 60×, NA=1.20, Olympus | Epi | sCMOS (Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 v2) | 50 | Chip-based method[77] | 500×500 | 130 | 20×, NA=0.45, Olympus | TIRF | sCMOS (Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 v2) | 20 | Chip-based method[78] | 500×500 | 70--75 | 25×, NA=0.8, Zeiss | TIRF | sCMOS (Hamamatsu ORCA flash) | 40 | Waveguide-PAINT[79] | 100×2000 | -- | 4×, NA=0.10, Olympus | TIRF | sCMOS (Prime 95B25MM, Photometrics) | -- |
|
Table 2. Comparison of parameters of different methods to achieve large field SMLM imaging
Type | Time cost | Number ofparameters | Blinking correction | Cluster shape | Cluster information |
---|
Ripley’s K function[109] | Normal | One | No | Radially symmetric | Overview | PC-PALM[116] | Normal | One | Yes | Radially symmetric | Overview | Bayesian Methods [124] | Very long | Zero | No | Code-dependent | Specified | DBSCAN[126] | Long | Two | No | Various | Specified | FOCAL [128] | Normal | One | No | Various | Specified | SR-Tesseler [132] | Normal | One | Yes | Various | Specified |
|
Table 3. Comparison of different cluster analysis methods