Author Affiliations
1Peking University, State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Beijing, China2Nano-optoelectronics Frontier Center of the Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing, China3Shanxi University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Taiyuan, China4Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing, China5National University of Singapore, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Singapore, Singapore6Shanxi University, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Taiyuan, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the system. (a) Two detuned and self-sustained optical microcavities with different resonant frequencies, and , which are directly coupled at strength . (b)–(d) Frequency spectra of the coupled cavities, showing three different long-term states: unsynchronized, limit cycle (LC), and synchronized (Sync.). Light blue represents the noise backgrounds from which the first- and second-order synchronizations are distinguished.
Fig. 2. Long-term evolutions of the two cavity modes under different coupling strengths. Three different categories are shown: (a) the unsynchronized (), (b) limit cycle (), and (c) synchronized states (). (a1)–(c1) Phase difference; (a2)–(c2) transient frequencies; (a3)–(c3) trajectory encircling types (black cross as the axis); and (a4)–(c4) dynamical potential near the synchrony point. In all figures, the given detuning and Kerr factor .
Fig. 3. Parameter dependence of the synchronization. (a), (b) Maximum of the frequency differences, , versus the coupling strength , with (, ) in (a) and (, ) in (b); inset shows the derivative. (c) Phase diagram in the plane with the Kerr factor . The inaccessible (gray), limit cycle (dark blue), and synchronized (light blue) regimes are marked. The red cross stands for the triple phase point . (d) The triple phase point depending on the Kerr factor .
Fig. 4. Hysteresis behavior in frequency difference. (a), (b) Frequency differences versus the evolution time in the first- and second-order transition regimes. Insets: the real-time evolution of the coupling strength . (c), (d) Maxima of the frequency differences, versus . For each plot, the Kerr factor ; the detuning in (a) and (c), and in (b) and (d).