• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 7, 1679 (2022)
Jingwen Dong1, Qiang Sun1、2, Zekun Jiao1, Liqi Zhang1、2, Ziqiang Yin1、2, Jiajie Huang1、2, Jinghan Yu3, Shu Wang3, Shangyuan Li3, Xiaoping Zheng3, and Wangzhe Li1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2School of Electronics, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.459762 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jingwen Dong, Qiang Sun, Zekun Jiao, Liqi Zhang, Ziqiang Yin, Jiajie Huang, Jinghan Yu, Shu Wang, Shangyuan Li, Xiaoping Zheng, Wangzhe Li. Photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar for high-resolution 3D imaging[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(7): 1679 Copy Citation Text show less
    Architecture of the proposed photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar. E/O, electro-optical converter; O/E, opto-electrical converter; ADC, analog-to-digital converter; DSP, digital signal processor; Ref., reference signal.
    Fig. 1. Architecture of the proposed photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar. E/O, electro-optical converter; O/E, opto-electrical converter; ADC, analog-to-digital converter; DSP, digital signal processor; Ref., reference signal.
    (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar. (b) Instantaneous frequency–time diagram of the reference signal, echoes, and de-chirped signals, in the case of a 2×2 array. LNA, low-noise amplifier; PA, power amplifier; LD, laser diode; WDM, wavelength-division multiplexer; f0, B, and Tp, center frequency, bandwidth, and pulse width of the reference signal, respectively; Tr and TR, pulse repetition periods of the reference signal and emission signal, respectively.
    Fig. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar. (b) Instantaneous frequency–time diagram of the reference signal, echoes, and de-chirped signals, in the case of a 2×2 array. LNA, low-noise amplifier; PA, power amplifier; LD, laser diode; WDM, wavelength-division multiplexer; f0, B, and Tp, center frequency, bandwidth, and pulse width of the reference signal, respectively; Tr and TR, pulse repetition periods of the reference signal and emission signal, respectively.
    Flowchart of 3D imaging based on the proposed system.
    Fig. 3. Flowchart of 3D imaging based on the proposed system.
    Test results of a static TCR. (a) Spectrum of one period de-chirped signal relative to one TX and four RXs. (b) Phase drift of RX1 (blue line) and phase difference drift between RX1 and RX4 (red line).
    Fig. 4. Test results of a static TCR. (a) Spectrum of one period de-chirped signal relative to one TX and four RXs. (b) Phase drift of RX1 (blue line) and phase difference drift between RX1 and RX4 (red line).
    Test results of a pair of rotating TCRs. (a) Single-channel ISAR image. (b) Range slice of one TCR.
    Fig. 5. Test results of a pair of rotating TCRs. (a) Single-channel ISAR image. (b) Range slice of one TCR.
    (a) Overhead topology of distributed MIMO radar on a bridge and the flight path passing by. (b) Photograph of distributed MIMO radar, including a CO, four TXs, and four RXs. (c) Layout of distributed MIMO radar and corresponding APCs.
    Fig. 6. (a) Overhead topology of distributed MIMO radar on a bridge and the flight path passing by. (b) Photograph of distributed MIMO radar, including a CO, four TXs, and four RXs. (c) Layout of distributed MIMO radar and corresponding APCs.
    Photograph and single-channel ISAR image of the imaged airplane.
    Fig. 7. Photograph and single-channel ISAR image of the imaged airplane.
    Comparison of reconstructed 3D images obtained by conventional MIMO radar and established MIMO radar: (a) the former including two TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 1.3 m [28]; (b) the latter including two TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 4.2 m; (c) the latter including four TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 9 m.
    Fig. 8. Comparison of reconstructed 3D images obtained by conventional MIMO radar and established MIMO radar: (a) the former including two TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 1.3 m [28]; (b) the latter including two TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 4.2 m; (c) the latter including four TXs and four RXs with a maximum baseline of 9 m.
    ParameterValue
    Number of TXs×RXs (M×N)4×4
    Center frequency (f0)10 GHz
    Bandwidth (B)2 GHz
    Pulse width (Tp)90 μs
    Pulse repetition period of the reference signal/emission signal (Tr/TR)100 μs/400 μs
    Sampling frequency500 MHz
    Sampling resolution12 bits
    Lengths of fiber links connecting TXm50 m/50 m/50 m/50 m
    Lengths of fiber links connecting RXn10 m/110 m/210 m/310 m
    Wavelengths of optical carriers of RXn (λn)1548.52 nm/1549.32 nm/1550.12 nm/1550.92 nm
    Horn antenna gain22  dBi
    Table 1. Main Design Parameters of the Established System
    Jingwen Dong, Qiang Sun, Zekun Jiao, Liqi Zhang, Ziqiang Yin, Jiajie Huang, Jinghan Yu, Shu Wang, Shangyuan Li, Xiaoping Zheng, Wangzhe Li. Photonics-enabled distributed MIMO radar for high-resolution 3D imaging[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(7): 1679
    Download Citation