[1] V Mlinar. Engineered nanomaterials for solar energy conversion. Nanotechnology, 24, 042001(2013).
[2] S Kumar, M Nehra, A Deep et al. Quantum-sized nanomaterials for solar cell applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 73, 821(2017).
[3] H Sun, J Deng, L B Qiu et al. Recent progress in solar cells based on one-dimensional nanomaterials. Energy Environ Sci, 8, 1139(2015).
[4] L J Brennan, M T Byrne, M Bari et al. Carbon nanomaterials for dye-sensitized solar cell applications: A bright future. Adv Energy Mater, 1, 472(2011).
[5] N L Yang, J Zhai, D Wang et al. Two-dimensional graphene bridges enhanced photoinduced charge transport in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano, 4, 887(2010).
[6] R Yu, Q F Lin, S F Leung et al. Nanomaterials and nanostructures for efficient light absorption and photovoltaics. Nano Energy, 1, 57(2012).
[7] Y Hu, H Wang, B Hu. Thinnest two-dimensional nanomaterial— graphene for solar energy. ChemSusChem, 3, 782(2010).
[8] W Li, A Elzatahry, D Aldhayan et al. Core-shell structured titanium dioxide nanomaterials for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev, 47, 8203(2018).
[9] S Su, W H Wu, J M Gao et al. Nanomaterials-based sensors for applications in environmental monitoring. J Mater Chem, 22, 18101(2012).
[10] Y M Sun, N Liu, Y Cui. Promises and challenges of nanomaterials for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Nat Energy, 1, 16071(2016).
[11] M Gao, J C Yao, C Yan et al. Novel composite nanomaterials with superior thermal and pressure stability for potential LED applications. J Alloy Compd, 734, 282(2018).
[12] G Ramakrishna, A K Singh, D K Palit et al. Dynamics of interfacial electron transfer from photoexcited quinizarin (Qz) into the conduction band of TiO2 and surface states of ZrO2 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B, 108, 4775(2004).
[13] I Hanzu, T Djenizian, P Knauth. Electrical and point defect properties of TiO2 nanotubes fabricated by electrochemical anodization. J Phys Chem C, 115, 5989(2011).
[14] F Nasirpouri, N S Peighambardoust, A Samardak et al. Structural defect-induced bandgap narrowing in dopant-free anodic TiO2 nanotubes. ChemElectroChem, 4, 1227(2017).
[15] H Menon, G Gopakumar, V Sankaranarayanan Nair et al. 2D-layered MoS2-incorporated TiO2-nanofiber- based dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemistrySelect, 3, 5801(2018).
[16] A Goban, K S Choi, D J Alton et al. Demonstration of a state-insensitive, compensated nanofiber trap. Phys Rev Lett, 109, 033603(2012).
[17] H Zhu, M M Zhao, J K Zhou et al. Surface states as electron transfer pathway enhanced charge separation in TiO2 nanotube water splitting photoanodes. Appl Catal B, 234, 100(2018).
[18] M Sachs, E Pastor, A Kafizas et al. Evaluation of surface state mediated charge recombination in anatase and rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem Lett, 7, 3742(2016).
[19] J W Zheng, L E Mo, W C Chen et al. An investigation of surface states energy distribution and band edge shifts in solar cells based on TiO2 submicrospheres and nanoparticles. Electrochimica Acta, 232, 38(2017).
[20] T Sidorova. A model of electron tunneling to the surface states in TiO2 with application to photocatalysis. Int J Nanosci, 18, 1940034(2019).
[21] C Fàbrega, D Monllor-Satoca, S Ampudia et al. Tuning the fermi level and the kinetics of surface states of TiO2 nanorods by means of ammonia treatments. J Phys Chem C, 117, 20517(2013).
[22] R Huber, S Spörlein, J E Moser et al. The role of surface states in the ultrafast photoinduced electron transfer from sensitizing dye molecules to semiconductor colloids. J Phys Chem B, 104, 8995(2000).
[23] M Antuch, P Millet, A de Iwase et al. The role of surface states during photocurrent switching: Intensity modulated photocurrent spectroscopy analysis of BiVO4 photoelectrodes. Appl Catal B, 237, 401(2018).
[24] M K Hossain, A A Mortuza, S K Sen et al. A comparative study on the influence of pure anatase and Degussa-P25 TiO2 nanomaterials on the structural and optical properties of dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) photoanode. Optik, 171, 507(2018).
[25] C K Kim, J M Ji, H Zhou et al. Tellurium-doped, mesoporous carbon nanomaterials as transparent metal-free counter electrodes for high-performance bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanomaterials, 10, E29(2019).
[26] S Mehra, S Bishnoi, A Jaiswal et al. A review on spectral converting nanomaterials as a photoanode layer in dye-sensitized solar cells with implementation in energy storage devices. Energy Storage, 2, e120(2020).
[27] K K Tehare, S T Navale, F J Stadler et al. Enhanced DSSCs performance of TiO2 nanostructure by surface passivation layers. Mater Res Bull, 99, 491(2018).
[28] G Gopakumar, A Ashok, S N Vijayaraghavan et al. MoO3 surface passivation on TiO2: An efficient approach to minimize loss in fill factor and maximum power of dye sensitized solar cell. Appl Surf Sci, 447, 554(2018).
[29] K E Roelofs, T P Brennan, J C Dominguez et al. Effect of Al2O3 recombination barrier layers deposited by atomic layer deposition in solid-state CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C, 117, 5584(2013).
[30] A R Pascoe, L Bourgeois, N W Duffy et al. Surface state recombination and passivation in nanocrystalline TiO2 dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C, 117, 25118(2013).
[31] C Prasittichai, J T Hupp. Surface modification of SnO2 photoelectrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells: Significant improvements in photovoltage via Al2O3 atomic layer deposition. J Phys Chem Lett, 1, 1611(2010).
[32] E Palomares, J N Clifford, S A Haque et al. Slow charge recombination in dye-sensitised solar cells (DSSC) using Al2O3 coated nanoporous TiO2 films. Chem Commun (Camb), 14, 1464(2002).
[33] Y J Wang, W K Bai, S L Han et al. Promoted photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen production performance of TiO2 nanowire arrays by Al2O3 surface passivation layer. Curr Catal, 6, 50(2017).
[34] J A Jeong, H K Kim. Thickness effect of RF sputtered TiO2 passivating layer on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 95, 344(2011).
[35] M Shanmugam, R Jacobs-Gedrim, C Durcan et al. 2D layered insulator hexagonal boron nitride enabled surface passivation in dye sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale, 5, 11275(2013).
[36] X J Yang, L Zhao, K Lv et al. Enhanced efficiency for dye-sensitized solar cells with ZrO2 as a barrier layer on TiO2 nanofibers. Appl Surf Sci, 469, 821(2019).
[37] J A van Delft, D Garcia-Alonso, W M Kessels. Atomic layer deposition for photovoltaics: Applications and prospects for solar cell manufacturing. Semicond Sci Technol, 27, 074002(2012).
[38] A Vasanth, N S Powar, D Krishnan et al. Electrophoretic graphene oxide surface passivation on titanium dioxide for dye sensitized solar cell application. J Sci: Adv Mater Devices, 5, 316(2020).
[39] C J Flynn, S M McCullough, E Oh et al. Site-selective passivation of defects in NiO solar photocathodes by targeted atomic deposition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8, 4754(2016).
[40] H Sun, H Kurotaki, K Kanomata et al. ZnO/TiO2 core-shell photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells by screen printing and room temperature ALD. Microsyst Technol, 24, 647(2018).
[41] J R Bakke, K L Pickrahn, T P Brennan et al. Nanoengineering and interfacial engineering of photovoltaics by atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale, 3, 3482(2011).
[42] L P Li, S K Chen, C Xu et al. Comparing electron recombination via interfacial modifications in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6, 20978(2014).
[43] C B Fei, J J Tian, Y J Wang et al. Improved charge generation and collection in dye-sensitized solar cells with modified photoanode surface. Nano Energy, 10, 353(2014).
[44] S A Kim, M A Abbas, L Lee et al. Control of morphology and defect density in zinc oxide for improved dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 18, 30475(2016).
[45] G Arthi, J Archana, M Navaneethan et al. Hydrothermal growth of ligand-passivated high-surface-area TiO2 nanoparticles and dye-sensitized solar cell characteristics. Scr Mater, 68, 396(2013).
[46] S W Rhee, H W Choi. Influence of RF magnetron sputtering condition on the ZnO passivating layer for dye-sensitized solar cells. Trans Electr Electron Mater, 14, 86(2013).
[47] S Y Lee, S H Kim. Deposition of TiO2 passivation layer by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition between the transparent conducting oxide and mesoporous TiO2 electrode in dye sensitized solar cells. Jpn J Appl Phys, 51, 10NE19(2012).
[48] C Y Neo, J Y Ouyang. Precise modification of the interface between titanium dioxide and electrolyte of dye-sensitized solar cells with oxides deposited by thermal evaporation of metals and subsequent oxidation. J Power Sources, 196, 10538(2011).
[49] Y S Jin, H W Choi. Properties of dye-sensitized solar cells with TiO2 passivating layers prepared by electron-beam evaporation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 12, 662(2012).
[50] N Tétreault, L P Heiniger, M Stefik et al. Atomic layer deposition for novel dye-sensitized solar cells. ECS Trans, 41, 303(2019).
[51] M Zafar, B Kim, D H Kim. Improvement in performance of inverted polymer solar cells by interface engineering of ALD ZnS on ZnO electron buffer layer. Appl Surf Sci, 481, 1442(2019).
[52] T Cossuet, E Appert, O Chaix-Pluchery et al. Epitaxial TiO2 shell grown by atomic layer deposition on ZnO nanowires using a double-step process and its beneficial passivation effect. J Phys Chem C, 124, 13447(2020).
[53] D H Kim, M D Losego, Q Peng et al. Atomic layer deposition for sensitized solar cells: Recent progress and prospects. Adv Mater Interfaces, 3, 1600354(2016).
[54]
[55] L F Paula, M Hofer, V P B Lacerda et al. Unraveling the photocatalytic properties of TiO2/WO3 mixed oxides. Photochem Photobiol Sci, 18, 2469(2019).
