• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 11, Issue 3, 03000e37 (2023)
Y. X. Wang1、2, S. M. Weng1、2、*, P. Li3、*, Z. C. Shen3, X. Y. Jiang1、2, J. Huang1、2, X. L. Zhu1、2, H. H. Ma1、2, X. B. Zhang1、2、4, X. F. Li1、2, Z. M. Sheng1、2、5、*, and J. Zhang1、2、5
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory for Laser Plasmas (MoE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Research Center of Laser Fusion of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, China
  • 4College of Physics and Electronics Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
  • 5Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2023.19 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Y. X. Wang, S. M. Weng, P. Li, Z. C. Shen, X. Y. Jiang, J. Huang, X. L. Zhu, H. H. Ma, X. B. Zhang, X. F. Li, Z. M. Sheng, J. Zhang. Depolarization of intense laser beams by dynamic plasma density gratings[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(3): 03000e37 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of laser depolarization by a PDG. The PDG driven by intersecting laser pulses #1 and #2 will be nonuniform in the direction and also time-dependent. After the probe laser pulse passes through such a PDG, its polarization state will become nonuniform and time-dependent.
    Fig. 1. Schematic of laser depolarization by a PDG. The PDG driven by intersecting laser pulses #1 and #2 will be nonuniform in the direction and also time-dependent. After the probe laser pulse passes through such a PDG, its polarization state will become nonuniform and time-dependent.
    The electron density distribution of (a) the overall plasma region and (b) the center region at , respectively. (c) The corresponding electron density profiles along the x direction at , respectively. Here, are roughly along the plasma density trough and peak, respectively. (d) The corresponding electron density profiles along the direction at , in which the inset displays the enlarged density profile in the region . The upper and lower envelopes of this density profile are also outlined by the red and blue curves, respectively.
    Fig. 2. The electron density distribution of (a) the overall plasma region and (b) the center region at , respectively. (c) The corresponding electron density profiles along the x direction at , respectively. Here, are roughly along the plasma density trough and peak, respectively. (d) The corresponding electron density profiles along the direction at , in which the inset displays the enlarged density profile in the region . The upper and lower envelopes of this density profile are also outlined by the red and blue curves, respectively.
    The time evolution of the electron density profile along the -axis. Note that the PDG experiences a time periodic process of formation, saturation and collapse. The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 2.
    Fig. 3. The time evolution of the electron density profile along the -axis. Note that the PDG experiences a time periodic process of formation, saturation and collapse. The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 2.
    The phase velocities of the s-polarized () and p-polarized () light waves obtained from Equations (4) and (5), respectively, in which the electron density profile presented in Figure 2(d) is employed.
    Fig. 4. The phase velocities of the s-polarized () and p-polarized () light waves obtained from Equations (4) and (5), respectively, in which the electron density profile presented in Figure 2(d) is employed.
    The spatial distributions of the Stoke parameters (a) , (b) , (c) and (d) of the probe laser pulse at after it passes through the PDG. Here, all Stokes parameters are normalized to the instantaneous maximum laser intensity . The simulation parameters are given in the text.
    Fig. 5. The spatial distributions of the Stoke parameters (a) , (b) , (c) and (d) of the probe laser pulse at after it passes through the PDG. Here, all Stokes parameters are normalized to the instantaneous maximum laser intensity . The simulation parameters are given in the text.
    (a) Longitudinal profiles of the Stokes parameters at and (b) transverse profiles of the Stokes parameters at . (c) Longitudinally averaged polarization degree and (d) transversely averaged polarization degree . The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 5.
    Fig. 6. (a) Longitudinal profiles of the Stokes parameters at and (b) transverse profiles of the Stokes parameters at . (c) Longitudinally averaged polarization degree and (d) transversely averaged polarization degree . The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 5.
    Laser depolarization by the PDG that is induced by two intersecting laser pulses with an intersection angle .
    Fig. 7. Laser depolarization by the PDG that is induced by two intersecting laser pulses with an intersection angle .
    The spatial distributions of the Stoke parameters (a) I, (b) Q, (c) U and (d) V of the probe laser pulse at after it passes through the PDG that is induced by two intersecting laser pulses with an intersection angle . Here, all Stokes parameters are normalized to the instantaneous maximum laser intensity . The simulation parameters are given in the text.
    Fig. 8. The spatial distributions of the Stoke parameters (a) I, (b) Q, (c) U and (d) V of the probe laser pulse at after it passes through the PDG that is induced by two intersecting laser pulses with an intersection angle . Here, all Stokes parameters are normalized to the instantaneous maximum laser intensity . The simulation parameters are given in the text.
    (a) Longitudinal profiles of the Stokes parameters at y = 0 and (b) transverse profiles of the Stokes parameters at . (c) Longitudinally averaged polarization degree and (d) transversely averaged polarization degree . The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 8.
    Fig. 9. (a) Longitudinal profiles of the Stokes parameters at y = 0 and (b) transverse profiles of the Stokes parameters at . (c) Longitudinally averaged polarization degree and (d) transversely averaged polarization degree . The simulation parameters are the same as those in Figure 8.
    The saturation time (black solid lines) and the maximal achievable ion density (red solid lines) as functions of (a) the laser intensity for a given initial plasma density and (b) the initial plasma density for a given laser intensity . Except for the laser intensities and initial plasma densities, other laser–plasma parameters are the same as those used in Figure 5.
    Fig. 10. The saturation time (black solid lines) and the maximal achievable ion density (red solid lines) as functions of (a) the laser intensity for a given initial plasma density and (b) the initial plasma density for a given laser intensity . Except for the laser intensities and initial plasma densities, other laser–plasma parameters are the same as those used in Figure 5.
    Y. X. Wang, S. M. Weng, P. Li, Z. C. Shen, X. Y. Jiang, J. Huang, X. L. Zhu, H. H. Ma, X. B. Zhang, X. F. Li, Z. M. Sheng, J. Zhang. Depolarization of intense laser beams by dynamic plasma density gratings[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(3): 03000e37
    Download Citation