• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 21, Issue 10, 102701 (2023)
Liwen Qiao1, Jia-Xin Peng1、2, Baiqiang Zhu1、2, Weiping Zhang2、3、4、5, and Keye Zhang1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Quantum Institute for Light and Atoms, State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • 2Shanghai Branch, Hefei National Laboratory, Shanghai 201315, China
  • 3School of Physics and Astronomy, and Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 4Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Sciences, Shanghai 201315, China
  • 5Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202321.102701 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Liwen Qiao, Jia-Xin Peng, Baiqiang Zhu, Weiping Zhang, Keye Zhang. Optimal initial states for quantum parameter estimation based on Jaynes–Cummings model [Invited][J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2023, 21(10): 102701 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Quantum parameter estimation is a crucial tool for inferring unknown parameters in physical models from experimental data. The Jaynes–Cummings model is a widely used model in quantum optics that describes the interaction between an atom and a single-mode quantum optical field. In this Letter, we systematically investigate the problem of estimating the atom-light coupling strength in this model and optimize the initial state in the full Hilbert space. We compare the precision limits achievable for different optical field quantum states, including coherent states, amplitude- and phase-squeezed states, and provide experimental suggestions with an easily prepared substitute for the optimal state. Our results provide valuable insights into optimizing quantum parameter estimation in the Jaynes–Cummings model and can have practical implications for quantum metrology with hybrid quantum systems.
    Fg=4(gψg|gψg|ψg|gψg|2),

    View in Article

    Δ2g^1/νFg.

    View in Article

    h^gH=i(gU^g)U^g,

    View in Article

    Fg=4[ψ0|(h^gH)2|ψ0ψ0|h^gH|ψ02]=4ψ0|(Δh^gH)2|ψ0.

    View in Article

    Fg,Max=[λmax(h^gH)λmin(h^gH)]2,

    View in Article

    H^=ω02σ^z+ωa^a^+g(σ^+a^+a^σ^),

    View in Article

    H^N=[(N12)ω+12ΔgNgN(N12)ω12Δ]=gNσ^1+12Δσ^3,

    View in Article

    σ^1=[0110],σ^2=[0ii0],σ^3=[1001].

    View in Article

    h^gH,N=c1σ^1+c2σ^2+c3σ^3,

    View in Article

    c1=N[4Ntg2Ω+Δ2sin(tΩ)]Ω3,c2=ΔN[1cos(tΩ)]Ω2,c3=2NΔg[tΩ2Ωsin(tΩ)]Ω4.

    View in Article

    h^gH,Nd1σ^1+d3σ^3

    View in Article

    d1=4N3g2tΩ2,d3=2NΔgtΩ2.

    View in Article

    h^gH,N=2NgtΩn·σ,

    View in Article

    |ψ0,Max(N)=12(|e,N1+i|g,N).

    View in Article

    Fg,Max(N)=16N2g2t2Ω2.

    View in Article

    |ψ0=N=0CN|ψ0(N),

    View in Article

    h^gH=N=0h^gH,N.

    View in Article

    Fg=4[N=0PNψ0(N)|(h^gH,N)2|ψ0(N)]4(N=0PNψ0(N)|h^gH,N|ψ0(N))2.

    View in Article

    Fg(N)=4[PNψ0(N)|(h^gH,N)2|ψ0(N)]4(PNψ0(N)|h^gH,N|ψ0(N))2.

    View in Article

    FgO=N=0PNFg,Max(N),

    View in Article

    Fg,Max(N)=16N2g2t2Δ2+4Ng24Nt2.

    View in Article

    Fg,Max(N)16N2g2t2Δ2.

    View in Article

    |ψ0O,bs=P0|g,0+PN|e,N1+i|g,N2.

    View in Article

    FgO,bs=P0Fg,Max(0)+PNFg,Max(N)=N¯N16N2g2t2Δ2+4g2N.

    View in Article

    |ψ0P=|ψo|ψa,

    View in Article

    |ψo=n=0|cn|eiϕn|n,|ψa=12(|e+eiχ|g),

    View in Article

    Liwen Qiao, Jia-Xin Peng, Baiqiang Zhu, Weiping Zhang, Keye Zhang. Optimal initial states for quantum parameter estimation based on Jaynes–Cummings model [Invited][J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2023, 21(10): 102701
    Download Citation