• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 10, 1013001 (2022)
Lujiu Zha1、3, Yonghua Xia2、3、*, Bin Wang2、**, Minglong Yang2、3, Yirong Pan1、3, Ruo Chen1、3, and Qi Zhu1、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, Yunnan , China
  • 2City College, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650051, Yunnan , China
  • 3Surveying & Mapping Technology and Application Research Center on Plateau Mountains of Yunnan Higher Education, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, Yunnan , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1013001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lujiu Zha, Yonghua Xia, Bin Wang, Minglong Yang, Yirong Pan, Ruo Chen, Qi Zhu. Registration Method of Video Image and Laser Point Cloud Under Moving Measurement[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(10): 1013001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Research technology road map
    Fig. 1. Research technology road map
    Process diagram of Zhang Zhengyou camera calibration method realized by Matlab2020 program algorithm. (a) Checkerboard images obtained from different directions; (b) origin determination and corner detection of image coordinates; (c) positions of 17 checkerboard images in the image coordinate system; (d) parameter test accuracy of 17 checkerboard images
    Fig. 2. Process diagram of Zhang Zhengyou camera calibration method realized by Matlab2020 program algorithm. (a) Checkerboard images obtained from different directions; (b) origin determination and corner detection of image coordinates; (c) positions of 17 checkerboard images in the image coordinate system; (d) parameter test accuracy of 17 checkerboard images
    Schematic of working mode of equipment integration installation
    Fig. 3. Schematic of working mode of equipment integration installation
    Initial parameter registration effect. (a) Key frame position and shooting direction; (b) point cloud data backprojecting to key frames of video images
    Fig. 4. Initial parameter registration effect. (a) Key frame position and shooting direction; (b) point cloud data backprojecting to key frames of video images
    Accurate registration effect of the iterative method of weight selection based on Robust estimation. (a) Registration effect without using Robust method to improve the accuracy of registration parameters; (b) registration effect using Robust method to improve the accuracy of registration parameters; (c) video image point cloud and laser point cloud registration fusion effect
    Fig. 5. Accurate registration effect of the iterative method of weight selection based on Robust estimation. (a) Registration effect without using Robust method to improve the accuracy of registration parameters; (b) registration effect using Robust method to improve the accuracy of registration parameters; (c) video image point cloud and laser point cloud registration fusion effect
    Schematic of point cloud 3D model reconstruction using the proposed method. (a) Laser point cloud of the base of the national flagpole; (b) point cloud of the national flagpole after registration;(c) reconstruction of 3D models of video images and laser point clouds
    Fig. 6. Schematic of point cloud 3D model reconstruction using the proposed method. (a) Laser point cloud of the base of the national flagpole; (b) point cloud of the national flagpole after registration;(c) reconstruction of 3D models of video images and laser point clouds
    Focal lengthCenter coordinateRadial distortionTangential distortion
    fxfyu0v0k1k2p1p2
    192.64192.53200.74150.43-0.8241-0.76590.002470.00368
    Table 1. Camera calibration parameter table
    Livox Mid-40Gopro black 8Wit WTGAHRS2
    Laser wavelengthFOVMaximum rangeDivergent angleSensor sizePixelMaximum resolutionPositioning accuracyPrecision of angleAttitude measurement stability
    905 mm38.4°260 m@80% reflectivity0.28°(vertical)×0.03°(level)9.982 mm×9.982 mm8 million3280×2160±0.5 mstatic 0.05° dynamic 0.1°0.01°
    Table 2. Relevant parameters of experimental instruments
    No.

    Measured coordinate

    of checkpoint WGS-84

    Point cloud coordinate of

    the same name WGS-84

    Error precision
    XYZXYZDxDyDz
    1494.494728.8071894.605494.554728.7651894.685-0.0600.042-0.080
    2488.137721.8661894.086488.202721.8031894.196-0.0650.063-0.110
    3485.618713.8261893.883485.705713.8981893.731-0.087-0.0700.152
    4473.868708.4701893.993473.789708.2301893.8930.0790.2400.100
    5465.337703.9151894.678465.382703.8091894.792-0.0450.106-0.110
    6461.747696.9291894.049461.653696.9931894.1600.094-0.060-0.110
    7462.803691.4321893.828462.693691.4521893.9300.110-0.020-0.100
    8444.450684.7521894.358444.530684.6981894.307-0.0800.05400.051
    9436.825666.0341893.775436.895666.1201893.760-0.070-0.0900.015
    10434.358675.8921894.367434.308675.9571894.3620.050-0.0700.005
    11448.600653.7841893.541448.703653.8971893.581-0.103-0.110-0.040
    12453.006658.4091893.688453.103658.4011893.619-0.0970.0080.069
    13473.495678.5921893.808473.488678.4801893.8790.0070.112-0.070
    14488.872687.9871893.838488.802687.8571893.8680.0700.130-0.030
    15497.476702.0051893.879497.550702.0871893.801-0.074-0.0800.078
    16500.709734.4231893.927500.761734.4791893.834-0.052-0.0600.093
    17507.491741.3791894.586507.481741.2911894.6900.0100.088-0.100
    18511.308738.9461893.955511.35738.9871893.857-0.042-0.0400.098
    19509.759743.3051894.544509.783743.3911894.509-0.024-0.0900.035
    20510.953744.4451893.952510.883744.4821893.9070.070-0.0400.045
    Table 3. Accuracy test of registration results
    No.TypeActual size /mModel size /mSize deviation /m
    1Base length5.3875.394-0.007
    2Step of high0.1550.1530.002
    3Square table body width0.6240.6220.002
    4Square table height0.4830.4790.004
    5Square table body spacing3.5843.589-0.005
    6Next step of the flagpole1.7961.7920.004
    7Two steps below the flagpole1.2221.229-0.007
    8Step descend from the flagpole0.1550.1500.005
    9Slanted column below the flagpole1.2191.2170.002
    Table 4. Comparison between the measured values and those of the 3D model
    Lujiu Zha, Yonghua Xia, Bin Wang, Minglong Yang, Yirong Pan, Ruo Chen, Qi Zhu. Registration Method of Video Image and Laser Point Cloud Under Moving Measurement[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(10): 1013001
    Download Citation