• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 5, 0514001 (2022)
Zhiru Shen1、2, Tong Zhao1、2、*, Anbang Wang1、2, and Yuncai Wang3、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control System, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, China
  • 2College of Physics and Optoelectronics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, China
  • 3School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou , Guangdong 510006, China
  • 4Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Photonics Information Technology, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou , Guangdong 510006, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0514001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhiru Shen, Tong Zhao, Anbang Wang, Yuncai Wang. Switching Between Stable and Quasi-Periodic States in Circular-Side Hexagonal Resonator Microcavity Laser with Optical Feedback[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(5): 0514001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of CSHR microcavity laser with optical feedback
    Fig. 1. Schematic of CSHR microcavity laser with optical feedback
    Simulation results of switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state. (a) Optical spectrum; (b) frequency spectrum; (c) time series; (d) phase diagram
    Fig. 2. Simulation results of switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state. (a) Optical spectrum; (b) frequency spectrum; (c) time series; (d) phase diagram
    Switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state under different feedback rates. (a1)‒(c1) Time series; (a2)‒(c2) frequency spectra
    Fig. 3. Switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state under different feedback rates. (a1)‒(c1) Time series; (a2)‒(c2) frequency spectra
    Influence factors of ΔP and duration time of switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state. (a) Feedback rate; (b) bias current
    Fig. 4. Influence factors of ΔP and duration time of switching between stable state and quasi-periodic state. (a) Feedback rate; (b) bias current
    Bifurcation diagrams of microcavity laser with optical feedback under high bias current. (a) τf=0.2 ns; (b) τf=1.5 ns
    Fig. 5. Bifurcation diagrams of microcavity laser with optical feedback under high bias current. (a) τf=0.2 ns; (b) τf=1.5 ns
    Bifurcation diagrams of microcavity laser with optical feedback under low bias current. (a) τf=1.5 ns; (b) τf=5.0 ns
    Fig. 6. Bifurcation diagrams of microcavity laser with optical feedback under low bias current. (a) τf=1.5 ns; (b) τf=5.0 ns
    Simulation results of transition state. (a) Optical spectrum; (b) frequency spectra; (c) time series; (d) phase diagram
    Fig. 7. Simulation results of transition state. (a) Optical spectrum; (b) frequency spectra; (c) time series; (d) phase diagram
    ParameterDescriptionValue
    NtrTransparency density1.2×1018 cm-3
    NsLogarithmic gain parameter0.92Ntr
    ngGroup refractive index3.5
    ηCurrent injection efficiency0.8
    αLinewidth enhancement factor4
    ΓConfinement factor0.25
    RSide length of active area7.5 μm
    dThickness of the active region200 nm
    ADefect recombination coefficient1×108 s-1
    BRadiation recombination coefficient1×10-10 cm3/s
    CAuger recombination coefficient1×10-28 cm6/s
    g0Material gain parameter1500 cm-1
    λCenter wavelength1550 nm
    τLCavity roundtrip time0.55 ps
    εGain suppression factor18/Ntr
    Table 1. Values of the parameters for CSHR microcavity laser[25-26]
    Zhiru Shen, Tong Zhao, Anbang Wang, Yuncai Wang. Switching Between Stable and Quasi-Periodic States in Circular-Side Hexagonal Resonator Microcavity Laser with Optical Feedback[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(5): 0514001
    Download Citation