• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 4, B81 (2021)
Xiao Wang1, Yufeng Qian1, JingJing Zhang1, Guangdong Ma1, Shupeng Zhao1, RuiFeng Liu1、*, Hongrong Li1, Pei Zhang1, Hong Gao1, Feng Huang2、3, and Fuli Li1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Information and Quantum Optoelectronic Devices, School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
  • 2School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
  • 3e-mail: huangf@fzu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.412965 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiao Wang, Yufeng Qian, JingJing Zhang, Guangdong Ma, Shupeng Zhao, RuiFeng Liu, Hongrong Li, Pei Zhang, Hong Gao, Feng Huang, Fuli Li. Learning to recognize misaligned hyperfine orbital angular momentum modes[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(4): B81 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Orbital angular momentum (OAM)-carrying beams have received extensive attention due to their high-dimensional characteristics in the context of free-space optical communication. However, accurate OAM mode recognition still suffers from reference misalignment of lateral displacement, beam waist size, and initial phase. Here we propose a deep-learning method to exquisitely recognize OAM modes under misalignment by using an alignment-free fractal multipoint interferometer. Our experiments achieve 98.35% recognizing accuracy when strong misalignment is added to hyperfine OAM modes whose Bures distance is 0.01. The maximum lateral displacement we added with respect to the perfectly on-axis beam is about ±0.5 beam waist size. This work offers a superstable proposal for OAM mode recognition in the application of free-space optical communication and allows an increase of the communication capacity.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    It is well known that the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of photons was discovered by Allen et al. [1] in 1992. Since the topological charge can be any integer, the OAM-carrying beams have countless orthogonal eigenstates, which allows them to have high-dimensional characteristics [2]. Benefiting from such high-dimensional characteristics, current applications of free-space optical (FSO) communication with OAM states are widely studied in the lab and real urban environments [310]. Naturally, the recognition of OAM modes in the receiving unit is one of the most important tasks for an optical communication system. A Gaussian mode converted by a forked hologram from the target OAM mode is the only mode that couples efficiently into the single-mode fiber [11]. More complicated computational holograms can be designed for the recognition of OAM superposition states [12]. Leach et al. presented the cascading additional Mach–Zehnder interferometers with dove prisms, which can sort OAM eigenstates into different paths [13]. By employing the Cartesian to log-polar transformation, one can convert the helically phased light beam corresponding to OAM state into a beam with a transverse phase gradient, and separate OAM eigenstates into different lateral positions [1417]. Extensive research has also been carried out to characterize OAM modes by letting beams form diffraction patterns by passing through well-designed masks, such as multipoint interference [18], triangular aperture diffraction [19], angular-double-slit interference [20], and gradually changing-period grating [21].

    However, all the above OAM mode-recognizing methods require a complicated optical alignment process for FSO communication. Generally, the OAM of a light beam depends on the choice of the reference axis [22]. A pure OAM eigenstate will transform into the superposition of OAM states in a displaced coordinate frame [23] and result in the mixing of information between adjacent modes. In the standard approaches to FSO communication with the polarization of photons, the transmitting and receiving units with a shared reference frame are required. In 2012, Ambrosio et al. implemented the quantum communication [24] with hybrid polarization-OAM-entangled states, and this proposal is rotation-immune to the shared reference frame. Displacement of the reference frame also imposes serious obstacles to the application of FSO communication with OAM states. To overcome these obstacles, misalignment correction is implemented by using the mean square value of the OAM spectrum as an indicator [25]. However, OAM spectrum measurement with high precision under the case of misalignment is necessary before the OAM spectrum correction.

    Recently, with the rapid increase in computing power, deep learning (DL) [26] has once again become a hot topic in various disciplines. Trained deep neural networks (DNNs) show state-of-the-art performance in imaging through scattering media [2729], phase retrieval [30,31], structure light recognition [9,3236], and creating new quantum experiments [37]. A milestone in the history of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is the appearance of ResNet proposed by He et al. [38]. The core of the ResNet model is to establish shortcuts or skip connections between early layers and later layers, which helps in the backpropagation of the gradient during the training process, so as to train a deeper CNN. As a representative of CNNs, DenseNet [39] performs well in the ImageNet data set, it establishes dense connections between all early layers and later layers, and, specifically, each layer accepts all preceding layers as its additional inputs. Another major characteristic of DenseNet is the feature reuse through the connection of features on the channel. These characteristics allow DenseNet to achieve better performance than ResNet with fewer parameters and computational costs.

    In this work, we implement an alignment-free fractal multipoint interferometer for hyperfine OAM mode recognition assisted by DL. By using a well-designed fractal multipoint mask (FMM) to sample the complex phase fronts of OAM modes, wealthy diffraction intensity patterns can be recorded for different OAM modes. Meanwhile, the diffraction patterns are stable against reference misalignment because of the inherent periodic structure of the FMM. Stochastic disturbances of three different parameters of the OAM states are set in the experiments: (i) beam waist size ω[0.45,0.55]  mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0[0,2π]; (iii) lateral translation range along the x and y directions Δx,Δy[0.25,0.25]  mm. Here, the maximum lateral displacement of the FMM we added with respect to the perfectly on-axis beam is about ±0.5 beam waist size along the x and y directions, respectively. With the above three parameters changing randomly at the same time, we implement the recognition of OAM eigenstates with an accuracy of 100%. Adjacent OAM superposition states with a Bures distance (BD) close to 0.01 are also recognized with an accuracy higher than 98.3%. Benefiting from the simple FMM configuration and superhigh resolution recognition with high accuracy, our detection method is very useful for systems where the optical vortices are expected to be on very large scales, such as in FSO communication [9] and astronomical optical vortices [40].

    2. METHODS

    (a) Alignment-free fractal multipoint interferometer. Laser, He–Ne laser with 633 nm wavelength; L1, 50 mm lens; L2, 500 mm lens; SLM, phase-only spatial light modulator; L3, 300 mm lens; P, pinhole; L4, 300 mm lens; DMD, digital micromirror device; L5, 250 mm lens; CCD, charge-coupled device. (b) proposed FMM; (c) example of the far-field intensity patterns.

    Figure 1.(a) Alignment-free fractal multipoint interferometer. Laser, He–Ne laser with 633 nm wavelength; L1, 50 mm lens; L2, 500 mm lens; SLM, phase-only spatial light modulator; L3, 300 mm lens; P, pinhole; L4, 300 mm lens; DMD, digital micromirror device; L5, 250 mm lens; CCD, charge-coupled device. (b) proposed FMM; (c) example of the far-field intensity patterns.

    The LG modes have a complex field amplitude given byLGp(r,φ)rLp(2r2ω2)exp(r2ω2)exp(iφ),where (r,φ) are the radial and azimuthal coordinates, respectively. ω is the beam waist, and Lp(2r2/ω2) is the associated Laguerre polynomial. is the topological charge, and p is the radial mode index. The complex amplitude field after the FMM isU(x,y)=n=1Ncirc[(xxn)2+(yyn)2r0]LGp(r,φ),where circ(x,y) is the transmittance function of the aperture in the FMM, and r0 is the radius of the FMM aperture. xn, yn are the central coordinates of the nth aperture. In the experiments, we implement the lateral translation misalignment by adding random lateral displacement Δx and Δy along the x and y directions, respectively, for the FMM. Here we employ a model for the pattern of florets in the head of a sunflower proposed by Helmut Vogel [41] in 1979 to arrange the position of each aperture, which is given byxn=C1ncos(2πC22n),yn=C1nsin(2πC22n),where C1 is the constant scaling factor, and C2 is the divergence angle. Considering the Fraunhofer limit, the far-field intensity pattern in the detector plane I is given by the Fourier transform of the field in the FMM plane, I|F[U(x,y)]|2,and F[·] represents the Fourier transform.

    To estimate the topological charge of the LG modes with the recorded intensity patterns I, we define I=H(), where the H(·) represents the forward physical process that produces the diffraction pattern from the incident LG mode with the topological charge . The optimization problem can be implicitly written as^=argminL{H(),I,R()},where ^ is the estimate of the inverse, is the objective function to minimize, and R() is the regularizer, or prior knowledge term that imposes constraints on the solution.

    Schematic diagram of DenseNet-121. CONV, convolution layer; MP, max pooling layer; DB, dense block; GMP, global max pooling layer; FC, fully connected layer.

    Figure 2.Schematic diagram of DenseNet-121. CONV, convolution layer; MP, max pooling layer; DB, dense block; GMP, global max pooling layer; FC, fully connected layer.

    3. RESULTS

    We first perform the DenseNet-121 to recognize LG eigenstates with topological charge {5,4,,5} and p=0. In order to test the robustness of the proposed method, stochastic disturbance of three parameters of the OAM states is set simultaneously for the acquisition of each diffraction intensity pattern: (i) beam waist size ω[0.45,0.55]  mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0[0,2π]; (iii) lateral translation range along the x and y directions Δx,Δy[0.25,0.25]  mm. A total of 1100 experimental diffraction intensity patterns and their corresponding topological charge as labels are used as the data set, with 100 samples for each topological charge . All 1100 samples are randomly shuffled, of which the first 850 samples are used as the training set; the remaining 250 samples never participate in the training process.

    Examples of the experimental diffraction intensity patterns for LG eigenstates with topological charge ℓ∈{0,1,±2,5} and different FMM displacements Δx=Δy∈{0,0.15,0.25} mm. In addition, all the diffraction patterns are obtained with stochastic disturbances of the other two parameters: (i) beam waist size ω∈[0.45,0.55] mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0∈[0,2π]. Insets in (e1)–(e3) show the detailed profiles of the recorded intensity patterns.

    Figure 3.Examples of the experimental diffraction intensity patterns for LG eigenstates with topological charge {0,1,±2,5} and different FMM displacements Δx=Δy{0,0.15,0.25}  mm. In addition, all the diffraction patterns are obtained with stochastic disturbances of the other two parameters: (i) beam waist size ω[0.45,0.55]  mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0[0,2π]. Insets in (e1)–(e3) show the detailed profiles of the recorded intensity patterns.

    Confusion matrix for the recognition of misaligned LG eigenstates ℓ∈{−5,−4,⋯,5} and p=0, with the curves of accuracy and loss as functions of epochs on the top right.

    Figure 4.Confusion matrix for the recognition of misaligned LG eigenstates {5,4,,5} and p=0, with the curves of accuracy and loss as functions of epochs on the top right.

    Schematic diagram of a Bloch sphere constructed with |ℓ=±1⟩ bases. (a) An arbitrary state |ψ⟩ on the sphere and two adjacent superposition states ρA and ρB; (b) sphere is divided into 80,000 points corresponding to 80,000 states; the red box schematically indicates the position distribution of the nine selected superposition states for the experiments.

    Figure 5.Schematic diagram of a Bloch sphere constructed with |=±1 bases. (a) An arbitrary state |ψ on the sphere and two adjacent superposition states ρA and ρB; (b) sphere is divided into 80,000 points corresponding to 80,000 states; the red box schematically indicates the position distribution of the nine selected superposition states for the experiments.

    Experimental results of hyperfine LG superposition states. (a)–(c) Examples of the recorded diffraction intensity patterns for OAM superposition states under different misaligned configurations. The collection of each diffraction pattern in the figure is carried out with stochastic disturbances of the other two parameters: (i) beam waist size ω∈[0.45,0.55] mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0∈[0,2π]. To show the image clearly, we reduce the contrast of the image by setting the values of I=0.3×max{I}, where I>0.3×max{I}; (d) confusion matrix for superposition states from Mode 1 to Mode 9 with the curves of accuracy and loss as functions of epochs on the top right.

    Figure 6.Experimental results of hyperfine LG superposition states. (a)–(c) Examples of the recorded diffraction intensity patterns for OAM superposition states under different misaligned configurations. The collection of each diffraction pattern in the figure is carried out with stochastic disturbances of the other two parameters: (i) beam waist size ω[0.45,0.55]  mm; (ii) initial phase of OAM states φ0[0,2π]. To show the image clearly, we reduce the contrast of the image by setting the values of I=0.3×max{I}, where I>0.3×max{I}; (d) confusion matrix for superposition states from Mode 1 to Mode 9 with the curves of accuracy and loss as functions of epochs on the top right.

    Confusion matrix of LG modes with p=1. (a) Confusion matrix for LG eigenstates of ℓ∈{−2,−1,⋯,2} and p=1; (b) confusion matrix for superposition states from Mode 4 to Mode 8. Mode 4 to Mode 8 here represent the superposition states with p=1 at the same positions on the Bloch sphere in the case of p=0.

    Figure 7.Confusion matrix of LG modes with p=1. (a) Confusion matrix for LG eigenstates of {2,1,,2} and p=1; (b) confusion matrix for superposition states from Mode 4 to Mode 8. Mode 4 to Mode 8 here represent the superposition states with p=1 at the same positions on the Bloch sphere in the case of p=0.

    4. CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, we experimentally implemented hyperfine OAM mode recognition under strong misalignment by using an alignment-free fractal multipoint interferometer assisted by DL. The misalignment includes three stochastic disturbances of parameters: (i) beam waist size ω[0.45,0.55]mm; (ii) initial phase φ0[0,2π]; (iii) lateral translation Δx,Δy[0.25,0.25]  mm. Here, the maximum lateral misalignment of the FMM we added with respect to the perfectly on-axis beam is about ±0.5 beam waist size along the x and y directions, respectively. The well-tuned DenseNet-121 is demonstrated to be robust for recognizing very similar superposition states with a small BD of 0.01 between adjacent modes under the above strong misalignment. Benefiting from the robustness of the proposed method and simple FMM configuration, this scheme shows potential application for FSO communication where the optical vortices are expected to be on a large scale and the misalignment between the transmitting and receiving units is inevitable.

    References

    [1] L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. Spreeuw, J. Woerdman. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A, 45, 8185-8189(1992).

    [2] A. M. Yao, M. J. Padgett. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photon., 3, 161-204(2011).

    [3] A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, A. Zeilinger. Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 240401(2002).

    [4] G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas’ko, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold. Free-space information transfer using light beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Opt. Express, 12, 5448-5456(2004).

    [5] J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, A. E. Willner. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat. Photonics, 6, 488-496(2012).

    [6] N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, S. Ramachandran. Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers. Science, 340, 1545-1548(2013).

    [7] M. Krenn, R. Fickler, M. Fink, J. Handsteiner, M. Malik, T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, A. Zeilinger. Communication with spatially modulated light through turbulent air across Vienna. New J. Phys., 16, 113028(2014).

    [8] A. E. Willner, H. Huang, Y. Yan, Y. Ren, N. Ahmed, G. Xie, C. Bao, L. Li, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, M. P. J. Lavery, M. Tur, S. Ramachandran, A. F. Molisch, N. Ashrafi, S. Ashrafi. Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams. Adv. Opt. Photon., 7, 66-106(2015).

    [9] M. Krenn, J. Handsteiner, M. Fink, R. Fickler, R. Ursin, M. Malik, A. Zeilinger. Twisted light transmission over 143  km. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13648-13653(2016).

    [10] M. P. Lavery, C. Peuntinger, K. Günthner, P. Banzer, D. Elser, R. W. Boyd, M. J. Padgett, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs. Free-space propagation of high-dimensional structured optical fields in an urban environment. Sci. Adv., 3, e1700552(2017).

    [11] A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, A. Zeilinger. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature, 412, 313-316(2001).

    [12] E. Bolduc, N. Bent, E. Santamato, E. Karimi, R. W. Boyd. Exact solution to simultaneous intensity and phase encryption with a single phase-only hologram. Opt. Lett., 38, 3546-3549(2013).

    [13] J. Leach, M. J. Padgett, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold, J. Courtial. Measuring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257901(2002).

    [14] G. C. Berkhout, M. P. Lavery, J. Courtial, M. W. Beijersbergen, M. J. Padgett. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 153601(2010).

    [15] M. Mirhosseini, M. Malik, Z. Shi, R. W. Boyd. Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light. Nat. Commun., 4, 2781(2013).

    [16] Y. Wen, I. Chremmos, Y. Chen, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Yu. Spiral transformation for high-resolution and efficient sorting of optical vortex modes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 193904(2018).

    [17] Y. Wen, I. Chremmos, Y. Chen, G. Zhu, J. Zhang, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, S. Yu. Compact and high-performance vortex mode sorter for multi-dimensional multiplexed fiber communication systems. Optica, 7, 254-262(2020).

    [18] G. C. Berkhout, M. W. Beijersbergen. Method for probing the orbital angular momentum of optical vortices in electromagnetic waves from astronomical objects. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 100801(2008).

    [19] J. Hickmann, E. Fonseca, W. Soares, S. Chávez-Cerda. Unveiling a truncated optical lattice associated with a triangular aperture using light’s orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 053904(2010).

    [20] R. Liu, J. Long, F. Wang, Y. Wang, P. Zhang, H. Gao, F. Li. Characterizing the phase profile of a vortex beam with angular-double-slit interference. J. Opt., 15, 125712(2013).

    [21] K. Dai, C. Gao, L. Zhong, Q. Na, Q. Wang. Measuring OAM states of light beams with gradually-changing-period gratings. Opt. Lett., 40, 562-565(2015).

    [22] G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, L. Torner. Management of the angular momentum of light: preparation of photons in multidimensional vector states of angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 013601(2001).

    [23] M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas’ko, M. Soskin. Analysis of orbital angular momentum of a misaligned optical beam. New J. Phys., 7, 46(2005).

    [24] V. D’Ambrosio, E. Nagali, S. P. Walborn, L. Aolita, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino. Complete experimental toolbox for alignment-free quantum communication. Nat. Commun., 3, 961(2012).

    [25] Y.-D. Liu, C. Gao, X. Qi, H. Weber. Orbital angular momentum (OAM) spectrum correction in free space optical communication. Opt. Express, 16, 7091-7101(2008).

    [26] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, G. Hinton. Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436-444(2015).

    [27] M. Lyu, H. Wang, G. Li, S. Zheng, G. Situ. Learning-based lensless imaging through optically thick scattering media. Adv. Photon., 1, 036002(2019).

    [28] Y. Li, Y. Xue, L. Tian. Deep speckle correlation: a deep learning approach toward scalable imaging through scattering media. Optica, 5, 1181-1190(2018).

    [29] Y. Sun, J. Shi, L. Sun, J. Fan, G. Zeng. Image reconstruction through dynamic scattering media based on deep learning. Opt. Express, 27, 16032-16046(2019).

    [30] M. Deng, S. Li, A. Goy, I. Kang, G. Barbastathis. Learning to synthesize: robust phase retrieval at low photon counts. Light Sci. Appl., 9, 1(2020).

    [31] A. Goy, K. Arthur, S. Li, G. Barbastathis. Low photon count phase retrieval using deep learning. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 243902(2018).

    [32] Q. Zhao, S. Hao, Y. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wan, C. Xu. Mode detection of misaligned orbital angular momentum beams based on convolutional neural network. Appl. Opt., 57, 10152-10158(2018).

    [33] Z. Liu, S. Yan, H. Liu, X. Chen. Superhigh-resolution recognition of optical vortex modes assisted by a deep-learning method. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 183902(2019).

    [34] P. Wang, J. Liu, L. Sheng, Y. He, W. Xiong, Z. Huang, X. Zhou, Y. Li, S. Chen, X. Zhang, D. Fan. Convolutional neural network-assisted optical orbital angular momentum recognition and communication. IEEE Access, 7, 162025(2019).

    [35] S. Sharifi, Y. Banadaki, G. Veronis, J. P. Dowling. Towards classification of experimental Laguerre–Gaussian modes using convolutional neural networks. Opt. Eng., 59, 076113(2020).

    [36] T. Giordani, A. Suprano, E. Polino, F. Acanfora, L. Innocenti, A. Ferraro, M. Paternostro, N. Spagnolo, F. Sciarrino. Machine learning-based classification of vector vortex beams. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 160401(2020).

    [37] A. A. Melnikov, H. P. Nautrup, M. Krenn, V. Dunjko, M. Tiersch, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Briegel. Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 1221-1226(2018).

    [38] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770-778(2016).

    [39] G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, K. Q. Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4700-4708(2017).

    [40] M. Harwit. Photon orbital angular momentum in astrophysics. Astrophys. J., 597, 1266-1270(2003).

    [41] H. Vogel. A better way to construct the sunflower head. Math. Biosci., 44, 179-189(1979).

    [42] J. Dajka, J. Łuczka, P. Hänggi. Distance between quantum states in the presence of initial qubit-environment correlations: a comparative study. Phys. Rev. A, 84, 032120(2011).

    Xiao Wang, Yufeng Qian, JingJing Zhang, Guangdong Ma, Shupeng Zhao, RuiFeng Liu, Hongrong Li, Pei Zhang, Hong Gao, Feng Huang, Fuli Li. Learning to recognize misaligned hyperfine orbital angular momentum modes[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(4): B81
    Download Citation