• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 40, Issue 5, 052803 (2019)
Xiaorong Luo1, Tian Liao1, Jie Wei1, Jian Fang1, Fei Yang2, and Bo Zhang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
  • 2Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/5/052803 Cite this Article
    Xiaorong Luo, Tian Liao, Jie Wei, Jian Fang, Fei Yang, Bo Zhang. A novel 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with double shielding structures and ultralow gate-drain charge[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(5): 052803 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    A new ultralow gate–drain charge (QGD) 4H-SiC trench MOSFET is presented and its mechanism is investigated by simulation. The novel MOSFET features double shielding structures (DS-MOS): one is the grounded split gate (SG), the other is the P+ shielding region (PSR). Both the SG and the PSR reduce the coupling effect between the gate and the drain, and transform the most part of the gate–drain capacitance (CGD) into the gate–source capacitance (CGS) and drain–source capacitance (CDS) in series. Thus the CGD is reduced and the proposed DS-MOS obtains ultralow QGD. Compared with the double-trench MOSFET (DT-MOS) and the conventional trench MOSFET (CT-MOS), the proposed DS-MOS decreases the QGD by 85% and 81%, respectively. Moreover, the figure of merit (FOM), defined as the product of specific on-resistance (Ron, sp) and QGD (Ron, spQGD), is reduced by 84% and 81%, respectively.

    1. Introduction

    4H-silicon carbide (4H-SiC) MOSFETs are attractive for converters and inverters which require fast switching speed and low specific Ron, sp, owing to superior properties of SiC material and unipolar operation mechanism of MOSFETs[14]. SiC trench MOSFETs have high MOS-channel density and high channel mobility on trench sidewalls[510]. However, the trench corner suffers from a high electric field in the gate oxide in the blocking mode, which significantly influences the BV value and device reliability. In order to relieve the electric field in the gate oxide, the conventional trench MOSFET (CT-MOS) adopts a PSR under the trench gate[1116], the double-trench MOSFET (DT-MOS) introduces a PSR to constitute a trench source[17]. Meanwhile, the PSR could also reduce QGD, which improves the switching behavior. To further reduce QGD and make the SiC trench MOSFETs more suitable for the application towards high frequency, efforts must be made to decrease the QGD and improve the dynamic characteristics of SiC trench MOSFETs.

    In this paper, a novel trench MOSFET with double shielding structures (DS-MOS) is proposed. Sentaurus TCAD simulation demonstrates that the DS-MOS shows ultralow CGD and QGD. Moreover, the switching loss of the DS-MOS, CT-MOS and DT-MOS is also discussed in this paper.

    2. Device structure and mechanism

    Fig. 1(a) shows the schematic structure of the proposed DS-MOS. It features a grounded SG and a trench PSR. The PSR surrounds the trench source and the SG is below the trench control gate. Tox is the distance from the SG to the oxide bottom of trench, and Lox is the distance from the SG to the sidewall of oxide trench. Figs. 1(b) and 1(c) show the schematic structures of the DT-MOS and CT-MOS, respectively. For DS-MOS and the DT-MOS, Ls represents the length of P-base region. For CT-MOS, L stands for the lateral space between the PSR and the gate oxide boundary. The doping concentration and thickness of the drift region are 6 × 1015 cm–3 and 10 μm, respectively. The other parameters are shown in Table 1.

    (Color online) Schematic cross section of the (a) proposed DS-MOS, (b) DT-MOS, and (c) CT-MOS.

    Figure 1.(Color online) Schematic cross section of the (a) proposed DS-MOS, (b) DT-MOS, and (c) CT-MOS.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Fig. 2 illustrates the operation mechanism of double shielding structures. The structure in Fig. 2(a) is the trench gate MOSFET without the SG and the PSR[18]. The structure in Fig. 2(b)[18, 19] is the split gate MOSFET with the SG and the structure in Fig. 2(c) is the DT-MOS with the PSR. The DS-MOS has both SG and the PSR as shown in Fig. 2(d). On one hand, the SG acts as a shielding region between the gate and drain, and transforms part of the CGD into the CDS1 and CGS1 in series, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b), the CGD of split trench gate MOSFET can be demonstrated as: CGD = (CGS1–1 + CDS1–1)–1 + CGD3. On the other hand, the PSR reduces the CGD by partially transforming the CGD to CGS2 and CDS2 in series, as illustrated in Fig. 2(c), the CGD of DT-MOS can be demonstrated as: CGD = (CDS2–1 + CGS2–1)–1 + CGD4. Under combination of the SG and PSR, the CGD of DS-MOS can be demonstrated as: CGD = (CGS3–1 + CDS3–1)–1 + CGD5 + (CGS4–1 + CDS4–1)–1, as shown in Fig. 2(d). Under the same structure parameters, Fig. 3 compares the simulation results of CGD of the four structures shown in Fig. 2. The results verify the significant improvement of the double shielding structures on CGD. It is obvious that the CGD of the trench MOSFETs with only one shielding structure (Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 2(c)) are smaller than that of the trench MOSFET without shielding structures (Fig. 2(a)). More importantly, the proposed DS-MOS obtains the lowest CGD owing to the interacting shielding effect induced by the double shielding structures.

    (Color online) Capacitance distribution for (a) trench gate MOSFET without SG & PSR, (b) split trench gate MOSFET with SG, (c) DT-MOS, and (d) DS-MOS.

    Figure 2.(Color online) Capacitance distribution for (a) trench gate MOSFET without SG & PSR, (b) split trench gate MOSFET with SG, (c) DT-MOS, and (d) DS-MOS.

    (Color online) CGD of the four structures in Fig. 2.

    Figure 3.(Color online) CGD of the four structures in Fig. 2.

    3. Results and discussion

    In order to ensure good static characteristics of DS-MOS, Tox and Lox should be optimized. In this paper, the breakdown voltage (BV) is defined as the drain voltage at which either the impact ionization integral equals to unity or the electric field in the gate oxide reaches 3 MV/cm, and Ron, sp is estimated at VGS = 20 V and VDS = 1 V. The channel mobility is set as 15 cm2/(V·s). Figs. 4(a)4(c) show the influence of Ls, Tox and Lox on BV, Ron, sp and FOM (BV2/Ron, sp) for the DS-MOS. With the increase in Ls, the BV of DS-MOS decreases because the shielding effect of the PSR on gate oxide is weakened and thus the gate oxide breakdown is more likely to occur. In addition, larger Ls widens the current flow path and leads to lower Ron, sp. Therefore, to obtain a desirable trade-off between BV and Ron, sp, ie, the highest FOM = BV2/Ron, sp value, the optimum Ls = 1.1 μm is chosen. Fig. 4(d) depicts the influences of the Tox and Lox on the electron density. In the on state, the SG, oxide and N-drift form the MIS structures (marked by the black dotted line in Fig. 4(d)). The MIS structure forms depletion regions in the drift region (the depletion region boundaries are marked by the white line), and then JFET resistance is generated. High Lox and Tox values will weaken the lateral depletion effect of the MIS structure and maintain wide electron current path, which contributes to a low Ron, sp. Therefore, the optimized Lox is 0.3 μm. Under the optimized Ls and Lox, Tox will also affect the length of the accumulation channel (marked by the two-way arrow). Considering the BV of DS-MOS, the optimized Tox and Lox are 0.2 and 0.3 μm, respectively. In conclusion, the optimized Ron, sp is 4.08 mΩ·cm2 (denoted as point “A”) and BV is 1435 V (denoted as point “B”) in Fig. 4(b).

    (Color online) Tradeoff between Ron, sp (@VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and BV(@VGS = 0 V) for the DS-MOS (a) with varied Lox as the function of Ls, Tox is set as 0.2 μm and (b) with varied Tox as the function of Ls, Lox is set as 0.3 μm. OBD means oxide breakdown and ABD means avalanche breakdown. Optimized Ron, sp = 4.08 mΩ·cm2 (denoted as “A”) and BVR = 1435 V (denoted as “B”). (c) Influence of Tox, Lox, and Ls on FOM. (d) On-state depletion boundary (@VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and electron density with varied Tox and Lox at Ls = 1.1 μm. The white lines are the depletion boundaries.

    Figure 4.(Color online) Tradeoff between Ron, sp (@VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and BV(@VGS = 0 V) for the DS-MOS (a) with varied Lox as the function of Ls, Tox is set as 0.2 μm and (b) with varied Tox as the function of Ls, Lox is set as 0.3 μm. OBD means oxide breakdown and ABD means avalanche breakdown. Optimized Ron, sp = 4.08 mΩ·cm2 (denoted as “A”) and BVR = 1435 V (denoted as “B”). (c) Influence of Tox, Lox, and Ls on FOM. (d) On-state depletion boundary (@VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and electron density with varied Tox and Lox at Ls = 1.1 μm. The white lines are the depletion boundaries.

    Fig. 5 shows the dependences of CGD on Ls, Tox and Lox for DS-MOS. The CGD slowly increases with the increase in Tox, the reason is that the shielding effect is weakened if the distance between the SG and controlled gate electrode shortens. For Ls, the increasing Ls weakens the shielding effect of the PSR against the gate–drain coupling, thus the CGD increases. Obviously, the CGD is more sensitive to Lox than Tox at the same Ls, which means reducing the overlap of the gate–drain is more important than the location of the SG. Owing to the weakened shielding effect of the PSR on CGD with the increase in Ls, the influence of the Lox on CGD becomes more important.

    (Color online) Dependence of CGD (@VDS = 600 V) on Ls, Tox and Lox for DS-MOS.

    Figure 5.(Color online) Dependence of CGD (@VDS = 600 V) on Ls, Tox and Lox for DS-MOS.

    Fig. 6 shows the on-state output characteristic curves of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS. To obtain the highest FOM (BV2/Ron, sp), the optimized values of Ls = 0.9 μm and L = 0.3 μm are chosen for the DT-MOS and CT-MOS. The Ron, sp values of DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS are 4.08, 3.72 and 3.96 mΩ·cm2, respectively. The Ron, sp of the proposed device is a little bit higher than the other devices because of the JFET resistance generated by the SG and PSR, as shown in Fig. 4(d). With the increase in VDS, the JFET resistance increases and then the DS-MOS shows the lowest saturation current. Therefore, the DS-MOS is constructive to improve the short circuit capability of the device.

    (Color online) On-state output characteristic curves of the three devices at VGS = 20 V.

    Figure 6.(Color online) On-state output characteristic curves of the three devices at VGS = 20 V.

    Fig. 7 compares the CGD and QGD of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS. Owing to the shielding effect of the SG and PSR, the DS-MOS has the lowest CGD compared with other two devices. The CGD (@VDS = 600 V) of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS are 13, 68 and 83 pF/cm2, respectively. The DS-MOS exhibits the shortest Miller platform and smallest QGD of 26 nC/cm2 compared with the DT-MOS and CT-MOS, as shown in Fig. 7(b). Compared with the DT-MOS and CT-MOS, the QGD of DS-MOS is reduced by 85% and 81%, respectively.

    (Color online) Comparison of (a) CGD and (b) QGD of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS. The extracted QGD is 26, 174 and 138 nC/cm2, respectively. The inset is the simulation circuit.

    Figure 7.(Color online) Comparison of (a) CGD and (b) QGD of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS. The extracted QGD is 26, 174 and 138 nC/cm2, respectively. The inset is the simulation circuit.

    Fig. 8 shows the tradeoff between Ron, sp and QGD for the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS. A large Ls and L can reduce the JFET resistance and the Ron, sp. For the DS-MOS and the DT-MOS, the effect is weakened as Ls and L increase. The increase in Ls results in an increase in CGD and QGD because the shielding effect is weakened. The higher L directly causes a larger overlap area between the gate electrode and the drain electrode for the CT-MOS, and thus higher CGD and QGD are obtained. What’s more, the protection on gate oxide caused by the PSR becomes weak. Under the almost same Ron, sp, the QGD of the DS-MOS is reduced by 85% and 81% compared with that of DT-MOS and CT-MOS, respectively.

    (Color online) Tradeoff between Ron, sp (VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and QGD.

    Figure 8.(Color online) Tradeoff between Ron, sp (VGS = 20 V, VDS = 1 V) and QGD.

    Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) show the turn-off waveforms and simulation circuit of the three MOSFETs. The MOSFETs turn off at t = 20 μs and the devices are all 1 cm2. A SiC junction barrier Schottky diode (JBS) is used as the freewheeling diode and the gate resistor (RG) is set as 20 Ω. Owing to ultralow QGD for the DS-MOS, the high dV/dt and dI/dt values are obtained, leading to 76% and 80% reduction in turn-off losses (Eoff) compared with that of the DTMOS and CT-MOS, respectively. The specific dV/dt and dI/dt of the three MOSFETs are shown in Table 2.

    (Color online) (a) Turn-off waveforms of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS, respectively. (b) Simulation circuit of the turn-off characteristics.

    Figure 9.(Color online) (a) Turn-off waveforms of the DS-MOS, DT-MOS and CT-MOS, respectively. (b) Simulation circuit of the turn-off characteristics.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Fig. 10(a) shows the influence of the RG on switching loss (Eon + Eoff) in one switching cycle. Compared with the DT-MOS and the CT-MOS, the DS-MOS exhibits the lowest switching loss at different RG. As the RG increases, the difference of the switching loss among the three MOSFETs increases. The total power losses Pt of the device consist of conduction losses and switching losses, and can be calculated using[20, 21]:

    (Color online) (a) Dependence of Eon + Eoff on RG (VDS = 600 V, VGS = 0/20 V, Iload = 100 A/cm2). (b) Comparison of power losses as a function of switching frequency f (RG = 20 Ω).

    Figure 10.(Color online) (a) Dependence of Eon + Eoff on RG (VDS = 600 V, VGS = 0/20 V, Iload = 100 A/cm2). (b) Comparison of power losses as a function of switching frequency f (RG = 20 Ω).

    $ {P_{\rm t}} = {\rm d} {R_{\rm on,sp}} {I_{\rm d}}^2 + f ({E_{\rm on}} + {E_{\rm off}}), $  ()

    where d stands for the duty cycle which defined as the ratio of the time the MOSFET conducts to a switching period, and f is the switching frequency. Fig. 10(b) shows the power losses as a function of switching frequency and the duty cycle is set as 0.5. With the increasing switching frequency, switching losses become the dominant power dissipation and the advantage of switching performance of DS-MOS increases. When operating at 200 kHz, the DS-MOS realizes 48% and 43% reduction in the power losses compared with the DT-MOS and the CT-MOS. Table 2 summarizes the performance parameters for the three devices. Obviously, the DS-MOS obtains better performance than other two MOSFETs.

    Fig. 11(a) shows the 3-D view of DS-MOS. The SG is grounded through the contact holes along the z axis and the schematic cross section along the cut line AA’ is shown in Fig. 11(b). To avoid the electric connection between the gate and SG, there is a dielectric layer between them.

    (a) 3-D view of DS-MOS. (b) Schematic cross section along the cut line AA’.

    Figure 11.(a) 3-D view of DS-MOS. (b) Schematic cross section along the cut line AA’.

    4. Conclusion

    A novel 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with double shielding structures is proposed in this paper. The double shielding structures include a split gate and a trench P+ shielding region. The QGD of the proposed DS-MOS reduced by 85% and 81% compared with that of DT-MOS and CT-MOS without sacrificing BV, leading to a significantly improvement in the switching performance. Furthermore, the FOM defined as Ron, spQGD of the DS-MOS is decreased by 84% and 81% in comparison with that of the DT-MOS and CT-MOS, respectively, and thus the power dissipation is reduced, which makes the DS-MOS suitable for the high frequency and high power applications.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0400502).

    References

    [1] R Pittini, Z Zhang, M A E Andersen. Switching performance evaluation of commercial SiC power devices (SiC JFET and SiC MOSFET) in relation to the gate driver complexity. IEEE ECCE Asia Downunder, 233(2013).

    [2] X Zhang, C Yao, C Li et al. A wide bandgap device-based isolated quasi-switched-capacitor DC/DC converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 29, 2500(2014).

    [3] L Abbatelli, M Macauda, G Catalisano et al. Cost benefits on high frequency converter system based on SiC MOSFET approach. PCIM Europe; International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management, 1(2014).

    [4]

    [5] N Tega, D Hisamoto, A Shima et al. Channel properties of SiC trench-etched double-implanted MOS (TED MOS). IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 63, 1(2016).

    [6] Q Zhang, M Gomez. 1600V 4H-SiC UMOSFETs with dual buffer layers. International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 211(2005).

    [7] Y Sui, T Tsuji, J A Cooper. On-state characteristics of SiC power UMOSFETs on 115-μm drift layers. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 26, 255(2005).

    [8] N Tega, H Yoshimoto, D Hisamoto et al. Novel trench-etched double-diffused SiC MOS (TED MOS) for overcoming tradeoff between RonA and Qgd. International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 81(2015).

    [9] J A Cooper, M R Melloch, R Singh et al. Status and prospects for SiC power MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 49, 658(2002).

    [10] Y Hiroshi, N H Hatayama. Increased channel mobility in 4H-SiC UMOSFETs using on-axis substrates. Mater Sci Forum, 556/557, 807(2007).

    [11] J Tan, J A Cooper, M R Melloch. High-voltage accumulation-layer UMOSFET’s in 4H-SiC. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 19, 487(1998).

    [12] Y Kagawa, N Fujiwara, K Sugawara et al. 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with bottom oxide protection. Mater Sci Forum, 778–780, 907(2014).

    [13] Y Wang, Y C Ma, Y Hao et al. Simulation study of 4H-SiC UMOSFET structure with p+-polySi/SiC shielded region. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 64(2017).

    [14] J Wei, M Zhang, H Jiang et al. Charge storage effect in SiC trench MOSFET with a floating p-shield and its impact on dynamic performances. International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 387(2017).

    [15] I A Khan, J A Cooper, M A Capano et al. High-voltage UMOSFETs in 4H SiC. International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 157(2002).

    [16] J Wei, M Zhang, H P Jiang et al. Dynamic degradation in SiC trench MOSFET with a floating p-shield revealed with numerical simulations. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 64, 2592(2017).

    [17] T Nakamura, Y Nakano, M Aketa et al. Performance SiC trench devices with ultra-low Ron. Electron Devices Meeting, 26.5.1(2011).

    [18] P Goarin, G E J Koops, R V Dalen et al. Split-gate resurf stepped oxide (RSO) MOSFETs for 25 V applications with record low gate-to-drain charge. International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 61(2007).

    [19] X Luo, D Ma, Q Tan et al. A split gate power FINFET with improved ON-resistance and switching performance. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 37, 1185(2016).

    [20] X Zhou, R Yue, J Zhang et al. 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with floating/grounded junction barrier-controlled gate structure. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 64, 4568(2017).

    [21]

    Xiaorong Luo, Tian Liao, Jie Wei, Jian Fang, Fei Yang, Bo Zhang. A novel 4H-SiC trench MOSFET with double shielding structures and ultralow gate-drain charge[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(5): 052803
    Download Citation