A Method for Extracting 3D Axis and Cross-Sections of Tunnel Point Cloud

Dong Jing; Guangyu Zhang; Rufei Liu; Minye Wang

doi:10.3788/LOP202259.0828006

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 59 >Issue 8 >Page 0828006 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 59, Issue 8, 0828006 (2022)

A Method for Extracting 3D Axis and Cross-Sections of Tunnel Point Cloud

Dong Jing, Guangyu Zhang, Rufei Liu^*, and Minye Wang

Author Affiliations

College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao , Shandong 266590, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0828006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Dong Jing, Guangyu Zhang, Rufei Liu, Minye Wang. A Method for Extracting 3D Axis and Cross-Sections of Tunnel Point Cloud[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(8): 0828006 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Flow chart of 3D axis extraction

Download full size

Fig. 2. Boundary points extraction

Download full size

Fig. 3. Comparison of fitting accuracy. (a) Boundary lines with different degrees of deviation; (b) root mean square error of fitting with different components as independent variable

Download full size

Fig. 4. Sketch of 3D axis points extraction

Download full size

Fig. 5. Solving normal vector of cross-section by infinitesimal method

Download full size

Fig. 6. Experimental data. (a) Data Ⅰ; (b) data Ⅱ; (c) data Ⅲ

Download full size

Fig. 7. Comparison of boundary points extracted by two methods. (a) Our method; (b) traditional method

Download full size

Fig. 8. Comparison of horizontal 2D midline extracted by two methods. (a) Our method; (b) method in Ref. [4]

Download full size

Fig. 9. Extraction of 3D central axis and cross-section of two sets of data. (a) Data Ⅰ; (b) data Ⅱ

Download full size

Fig. 10. Top view of two cross-sections with the same inner diameter and different longitudinal slopes

Download full size

Fig. 11. Sketch of cross-section extraction error

Download full size

Parameter	Value
$(θ_{m i n}, θ_{m a x})$	（160°， 200°）
$R e_{m a x}$ /cm	1.0
$d_{m a x}$	$2 \cdot R e$
$R a_{m i n}$	80%
l /cm	0.1
e /cm	2.5

Table 1. Main setting parameters

Method	Data Ⅰ		Data Ⅱ		Data Ⅲ
Method	Time /s	number	Time /s	number	Time /s	number
Our method	4.6	5154	4.2	2527	0.9	928
Traditional method	25.6	6351	26.0	4987	5.4	1090

Table 2. Comparison of extraction results of two methods

Error	Our method	Ref.［4］
$σ$	2.7	177.1
$E_{m a x}$	4.5	571.8
$E_{m i n}$	0.3	0.004
$E_{m e a n}$	2.4	72.6

Table 3. Comparison of extraction errors between two methods

f	$\|a o\|$	Section 1			Section 2			Section 3			$\bar{\|a b\|}$ /mm
f	$\|a o\|$	$\|b o\|$ /mm	$\|a b\|$ /mm	ε /%	$\|b o\|$ /mm	$\|a b\|$ /mm	ε /%	$\|b o\|$ /mm	$\|a b\|$ /mm	ε /%	$\bar{\|a b\|}$ /mm
0	0.00	0.11	0.11	/	0.10	0.10	/	0.11	0.11	/	0.11
1%	50.00	49.39	0.61	1.22	49.32	0.68	1.36	49.74	0.26	0.52	0.52
2%	100.00	98.04	1.96	1.96	98.10	1.90	1.90	98.15	1.85	1.85	1.90
3%	150.00	146.42	3.58	2.39	146.40	3.60	2.40	146.46	3.54	2.36	3.57
4%	200.00	195.81	4.19	2.10	195.96	4.04	2.02	195.96	4.04	2.02	4.09
5%	250.00	242.40	7.60	3.04	242.35	7.65	3.06	242.47	7.53	3.01	7.59

Table 4. Analysis of the accuracy of tunnel cross-sections extraction

Dong Jing, Guangyu Zhang, Rufei Liu, Minye Wang. A Method for Extracting 3D Axis and Cross-Sections of Tunnel Point Cloud[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(8): 0828006

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information