Author Affiliations
1Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Urban Design, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China2China Construction Civil Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100071, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of bridge construction point cloud extraction
Fig. 2. Experimental point cloud data
Fig. 3. Point cloud data after denoising (side view)
Fig. 4. Point cloud data after denoising (vertical view)
Fig. 5. Enclosure
Fig. 6. Vegetation point cloud and bridge point cloud
Fig. 7. Filtering result based on dispersion (side view)
Fig. 8. Filtering result based on dispersion (vertical view)
Fig. 9. Combined radius filtering result ( side view )
Fig. 10. Combined radius filtering result ( vertical view)
Fig. 11. Filtering result based on statistics (side view)
Fig. 12. Filtering result based on statistics (vertical view)
Fig. 13. Result of normal filtering (side view)
Fig. 14. Result of normal filtering (vertical view)
Fig. 15. Result of proposed algorithm
Fig. 16. Filtering result of radius+colour+CSF
Fig. 17. Filtering result of radius+altitude+CSF
Fig. 18. Filtering result of radius+colour+normal
Fig. 19. Filtering result of radius+altitude+normal
Object | Red band | Green band | Blue band |
---|
Mean value | Variance | Mean value | Variance | Mean value | Variance |
---|
Building | 29.92 | 0.012 | 39.03 | 0.019 | 46.58 | 0.041 | Vegetation | 74.88 | 0.005 | 89.44 | 0.008 | 106.36 | 0.029 |
|
Table 1. Characteristic statistical value of different ground features at red, green, and blue bands
Algorithm | | | | | /% | /% | /% |
---|
Number of original point clouds | Target point cloud:4383679 | Non target point cloud:7420665 | Total:11804344 | Radius+colour+CSF[9] | 4281579 | 102100 | 373736 | 7046929 | 5.04 | 4.03 | 97.7 | Radius+altitude+CSF[2] | 4318881 | 64798 | 419295 | 7001370 | 5.65 | 4.10 | 98.5 | Radius+colour+normal filtering | 4314881 | 68798 | 282049 | 7138616 | 3.80 | 2.97 | 98.4 | Radius+altitude+normal filtering | 4347682 | 35997 | 301097 | 7119568 | 4.06 | 2.86 | 99.2 | Propose algorithm | 4352017 | 31662 | 54390 | 7366275 | 0.733 | 0.729 | 99.3 |
|
Table 2. Comparison results of different algorithms