• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 37, Issue 8, 0801003 (2017)
Jiayan Lü1, Mingyuan He1, Lin Chen2、3、*, Xiuqing Hu2、3, and Xin Li4
Author Affiliations
  • 1 College of Meteorology and Oceanography, PLA University of Science and Technology,Nanjing, Jiangsu 211101, China
  • 2 National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3 Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellite,China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 4 Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201737.0801003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiayan Lü, Mingyuan He, Lin Chen, Xiuqing Hu, Xin Li. Automated Radiation Calibration Method Based on DunhuangRadiometric Calibration Site[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 0801003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flowchart of automated ground data processing
    Fig. 1. Flowchart of automated ground data processing
    Influence of different AOD and ATR observed value error on reflectivity error at top of atmosphere
    Fig. 2. Influence of different AOD and ATR observed value error on reflectivity error at top of atmosphere
    Difference of equivalent reflectivity between ASD measured data and ATR observed data
    Fig. 3. Difference of equivalent reflectivity between ASD measured data and ATR observed data
    Ground reflectivity of Dunhuang site measured by ASD from the year of 2011 to 2015
    Fig. 4. Ground reflectivity of Dunhuang site measured by ASD from the year of 2011 to 2015
    Hyperspectral ground reflectivity fitted by multi-channel reflectivity
    Fig. 5. Hyperspectral ground reflectivity fitted by multi-channel reflectivity
    Difference among ISO of different BRDF in MODIS channel 1-7
    Fig. 6. Difference among ISO of different BRDF in MODIS channel 1-7
    DateAODWater vapor density /(g·cm -2 )O 3 content /DUSolar zenith angle /(°)Satellite zenith angle /(°)Relative azimuth angle /(°)
    2015-08-210.1221.0003297.430.0725.62128.47
    2015-09-130.0570.5284298.038.1415.19127.64
    2015-09-200.0580.8644277.241.363.97127.81
    2015-09-290.0571.0058272.144.5915.20126.21
    2015-10-040.0610.5353298.748.7218.66309.70
    2015-10-080.0590.3661302.348.1925.34124.70
    2015-10-130.0590.5836286.751.277.59306.46
    2015-10-220.0600.6129288.354.103.81119.56
    2015-10-270.0610.3299303.857.4628.86307.98
    2015-10-310.0600.9927285.256.6814.83124.73
    2015-11-070.0770.5817317.458.793.61121.88
    2015-11-120.0580.5128301.961.6928.86305.62
    2015-11-250.0540.4370271.262.2725.34119.46
    2015-12-020.0600.2636285.063.7815.01118.64
    2015-12-090.0600.4296288.264.803.79121.79
    2016-01-150.0670.3557322.163.7428.76298.27
    2016-03-070.2390.3822302.946.5614.83118.11
    Table 1. Atmospheric parameters and observation geometry parameters at satellite transit time
    DateD
    λ1λ2λ3λ4λ5λ6λ7
    2015-08-21-0.44-1.151.57-0.41-0.25-3.590.09
    2015-09-130.870.990.80-0.84-0.05-2.131.87
    2015-09-200.861.18-0.08-1.07-0.310.192.86
    2015-09-291.312.640.75-1.212.22-0.073.50
    2015-10-040.501.27-1.69-2.25-0.820.642.72
    2015-10-082.702.802.850.633.04-3.422.00
    2015-10-13-0.42-0.08-0.270.29-0.36-2.582.43
    2015-10-22-2.50-0.98-1.74-4.121.350.483.04
    2015-10-270.591.772.51-1.572.92-2.933.57
    2015-10-31-1.200.383.40-3.684.110.743.81
    2015-11-07-2.34-0.13-0.96-4.673.180.214.66
    2015-11-121.433.302.69-0.783.091.705.10
    2015-11-252.504.380.38-2.412.080.666.24
    2015-12-021.972.912.43-0.992.672.400.13
    2015-12-091.373.34-1.18-1.353.410.441.96
    2016-01-152.593.86-0.12-2.043.852.645.68
    2016-03-07-0.28-1.053.241.611.911.033.23
    Mean relative deviation0.561.500.86-1.461.88-0.213.11
    Standard deviation1.581.801.751.651.641.971.70
    Table 2. Relative deviation D , mean relative deviation and standard deviation between Rc and Rm %
    MethodRelative deviation
    λ1λ2λ3λ4λ5λ6λ7
    Automated radiation calibration method-0.44-1.151.57-0.41-0.25-3.590.09
    Reflectance-based method-1.00-1.980.49-0.390.94-0.815.29
    Table 3. Relative deviation of results obtained by automated radiation calibration method and reflectance-based method%
    Jiayan Lü, Mingyuan He, Lin Chen, Xiuqing Hu, Xin Li. Automated Radiation Calibration Method Based on DunhuangRadiometric Calibration Site[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 0801003
    Download Citation