• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 19, 1912001 (2021)
Fanfan Shen1、*, Ailing Tian1、**, Dasen Wang2, Bingcai Liu1, Xueliang Zhu1, and Hongjun Wang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Xi'an Technology University, Xi'an , Shaanxi 710032, China
  • 2Inner Mongolia Institute of Metal Materials, Ningbo , Zhejiang 315103, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1912001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Fanfan Shen, Ailing Tian, Dasen Wang, Bingcai Liu, Xueliang Zhu, Hongjun Wang. Correction of Eccentricity Error in Absolute Flat Surface Testing by Shift-Rotation Method[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(19): 1912001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Measurement process of shift-rotationn absolute measurement method
    Fig. 1. Measurement process of shift-rotationn absolute measurement method
    Position relationship between tested mirror and reference mirror. (a) Initial position; (b) rotation 90°; (c) rotate 180°
    Fig. 2. Position relationship between tested mirror and reference mirror. (a) Initial position; (b) rotation 90°; (c) rotate 180°
    Surface shape distribution of initial plane element. (a) A surface shape; (b) B surface shape
    Fig. 3. Surface shape distribution of initial plane element. (a) A surface shape; (b) B surface shape
    Relationship between PV and RMS values of residual surface shape and different parameters. (a) Eccentricity error; (b) rotation angle
    Fig. 4. Relationship between PV and RMS values of residual surface shape and different parameters. (a) Eccentricity error; (b) rotation angle
    Registration mode. (a) Benchmark image; (b) image to be registered; (c) registration route
    Fig. 5. Registration mode. (a) Benchmark image; (b) image to be registered; (c) registration route
    Surface shape distribution before registration. (a) T0'̑ surface shape; (b) Tπ' surface shape; (c) contour line at cross section
    Fig. 6. Surface shape distribution before registration. (a) T0'̑ surface shape; (b) Tπ' surface shape; (c) contour line at cross section
    Surface shape distribution after registration (a) T0'̑ surface shape; (b) Tπ' surface shape; (c) contour line at cross section
    Fig. 7. Surface shape distribution after registration (a) T0'̑ surface shape; (b) Tπ' surface shape; (c) contour line at cross section
    Initial surface distribution of different components. (a) C surface shape; (b) D surface shape; (c) E surface shape
    Fig. 8. Initial surface distribution of different components. (a) C surface shape; (b) D surface shape; (c) E surface shape
    ComponentParameter /nmOriginal surface shapeOriginal residual surface shapeResidual surface shape after error correction
    CPV25.0047.7830.034
    RMS4.3900.5780.004
    DPV13.9043.4140.017
    RMS2.5720.3410.002
    EPV15.6217.8810.021
    RMS2.8610.4980.002
    Table 1. Error correction results of different surface shapes
    Fanfan Shen, Ailing Tian, Dasen Wang, Bingcai Liu, Xueliang Zhu, Hongjun Wang. Correction of Eccentricity Error in Absolute Flat Surface Testing by Shift-Rotation Method[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(19): 1912001
    Download Citation