• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 5, Issue 4, 329 (2017)
Qinggele Li1, Marc Reinig1, Daich Kamiyama2,3, Bo Huang2..., Xiaodong Tao1, Alex Bardales1 and Joel Kubby1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1W.M. Keck Center for Adaptive Optical Microscopy, Baskin Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
  • 2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
  • 3Current address: Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000329 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Qinggele Li, Marc Reinig, Daich Kamiyama, Bo Huang, Xiaodong Tao, Alex Bardales, Joel Kubby, "Woofertweeter adaptive optical structured illumination microscopy," Photonics Res. 5, 329 (2017) Copy Citation Text show less
    Layout of the woofer–tweeter AOSIM. The DLP with 608×684 pixels (DLP3000 Texas Instruments) is placed at a conjugate plane of the objective lens focal plane. The SHW sensor consists of a lenslet array (f=24 mm) and a CCD camera (Photometrics) and is placed at a conjugate plane of the objective lens aperture plane. Blue line, 488 nm excitation light path (488 nm excitation laser from Spectra-Physics); green line, 515 nm emission path. The focal lengths of the lenses are f1=120 mm, f2=125 mm, f3=120 mm, f4=150 mm, f5=500 mm, f6=750 mm, f7=150 mm, f8=75 mm, f9=100 mm, f10=450 mm, f11=150 mm, f12=50 mm. M, mirror; SF, spatial filter; TL, trial lens (cylinder); F, filter; Di, dichroic mirror; FM, flip mirror.
    Fig. 1. Layout of the woofer–tweeter AOSIM. The DLP with 608×684 pixels (DLP3000 Texas Instruments) is placed at a conjugate plane of the objective lens focal plane. The SHW sensor consists of a lenslet array (f=24  mm) and a CCD camera (Photometrics) and is placed at a conjugate plane of the objective lens aperture plane. Blue line, 488 nm excitation light path (488 nm excitation laser from Spectra-Physics); green line, 515 nm emission path. The focal lengths of the lenses are f1=120  mm, f2=125  mm, f3=120  mm, f4=150  mm, f5=500  mm, f6=750  mm, f7=150  mm, f8=75  mm, f9=100  mm, f10=450  mm, f11=150  mm, f12=50  mm. M, mirror; SF, spatial filter; TL, trial lens (cylinder); F, filter; Di, dichroic mirror; FM, flip mirror.
    Comparison of (a)–(d) widefield and (e)–(h) SIM microscope images with and without wavefront correction. The figure shows the images of nanoparticles (110 nm) after introducing trial lens in between lenses f1 and f2. (a), (e) Without AO correction; (b), (f) woofer-only correction; (c), (d) tweeter-only correction; (d), (h) both woofer and tweeter correction. The scale bar is 5 μm.
    Fig. 2. Comparison of (a)–(d) widefield and (e)–(h) SIM microscope images with and without wavefront correction. The figure shows the images of nanoparticles (110 nm) after introducing trial lens in between lenses f1 and f2. (a), (e) Without AO correction; (b), (f) woofer-only correction; (c), (d) tweeter-only correction; (d), (h) both woofer and tweeter correction. The scale bar is 5 μm.
    Zernike modes of the wavefront errors with and without woofer–tweeter correction. The inset is the value of the remaining Zernike modes after removing the sixth-order vertical astigmatism. The Zernike order is in Noll single-index order [43].
    Fig. 3. Zernike modes of the wavefront errors with and without woofer–tweeter correction. The inset is the value of the remaining Zernike modes after removing the sixth-order vertical astigmatism. The Zernike order is in Noll single-index order [43].
    Comparison of 0.11 μm beads under AO widefield (black line) and AOSIM (red line), Shown as line plots of the intensity of beads in areas 1 and 2 of Figs. 2(d) and 2(h). (a) Intensity profile of two closely spaced beads. The distance between two well-resolved peaks in AOSIM is 145 nm. (b) The FWHMs of a single bead in widefield and AOSIM are 235 and 140 nm, respectively.
    Fig. 4. Comparison of 0.11 μm beads under AO widefield (black line) and AOSIM (red line), Shown as line plots of the intensity of beads in areas 1 and 2 of Figs. 2(d) and 2(h). (a) Intensity profile of two closely spaced beads. The distance between two well-resolved peaks in AOSIM is 145 nm. (b) The FWHMs of a single bead in widefield and AOSIM are 235 and 140 nm, respectively.
    Images of GFP-labeled aCC/RP2 motoneurons of a Drosophila embryo. (a) Widefield without AO, (b) SIM without AO, (c) widefield with AO, (d) SIM with AO, (e) intensity plots of the line profiles in (a)–(d). The lines are along the dendrites of the aCC. The scale bar is 10 μm.
    Fig. 5. Images of GFP-labeled aCC/RP2 motoneurons of a Drosophila embryo. (a) Widefield without AO, (b) SIM without AO, (c) widefield with AO, (d) SIM with AO, (e) intensity plots of the line profiles in (a)–(d). The lines are along the dendrites of the aCC. The scale bar is 10 μm.
    Zernike modes of the Drosophila embryo wavefront errors with and without woofer–tweeter correction [43].
    Fig. 6. Zernike modes of the Drosophila embryo wavefront errors with and without woofer–tweeter correction [43].
     No AOWoofer (W)Tweeter (T)Both W and T
    P-V (waves)8.930.752.310.36
    RMS (waves)2.050.180.460.08
    Strehl ratio0.060.270.080.75
    Table 1. Analysis of Measured Wavefront of Figs. 2(a)2(d)a
    Qinggele Li, Marc Reinig, Daich Kamiyama, Bo Huang, Xiaodong Tao, Alex Bardales, Joel Kubby, "Woofertweeter adaptive optical structured illumination microscopy," Photonics Res. 5, 329 (2017)
    Download Citation