• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 15, 1516027 (2021)
Zhaoyuan Xia1、2, Jing Qian1, Guande Wang1, Danyang Shen1、2, Kongyu Lou1、2, and Quanzhong Zhao1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1516027 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhaoyuan Xia, Jing Qian, Guande Wang, Danyang Shen, Kongyu Lou, Quanzhong Zhao. Research Progress on Ultrashort Pulsed Laser Processing of Metallic Glasses[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(15): 1516027 Copy Citation Text show less
    Formation of metallic glass. (a) Schematic diagram of metallic glass formation (Tm is the melting point of metal)[14]; (b) relationship between the critical cooling rate (Rc), the maximum sample thickness (dmax) of glass formation and the reduced glass transition temperature (Tg/Tm) for a typical bulk metallic glasses[15]
    Fig. 1. Formation of metallic glass. (a) Schematic diagram of metallic glass formation (Tm is the melting point of metal)[14]; (b) relationship between the critical cooling rate (Rc), the maximum sample thickness (dmax) of glass formation and the reduced glass transition temperature (Tg/Tm) for a typical bulk metallic glasses[15]
    Relationship between the tensile strength of bulk glass alloys and Young's modulus and the comparison with the data of crystalline metal alloys[15-16]
    Fig. 2. Relationship between the tensile strength of bulk glass alloys and Young's modulus and the comparison with the data of crystalline metal alloys[15-16]
    Dependence of coercive force on the saturation magnetostrictive constant for Fe and Co-based bulk metallic glasses and other soft magnetic alloys[24]
    Fig. 3. Dependence of coercive force on the saturation magnetostrictive constant for Fe and Co-based bulk metallic glasses and other soft magnetic alloys[24]
    Miniature gears with a diameter of about 300 μm made of Pt-based bulk metallic glass[27]
    Fig. 4. Miniature gears with a diameter of about 300 μm made of Pt-based bulk metallic glass[27]
    Conical spring microactuator[30]. (a) Conical spring microactuator in relaxed state; (b) conical spring microactuator in pull-in state; (c) 10×10 array of conical spring microactuators
    Fig. 5. Conical spring microactuator[30]. (a) Conical spring microactuator in relaxed state; (b) conical spring microactuator in pull-in state; (c) 10×10 array of conical spring microactuators
    Comparison of femtosecond laser induced ripple structures[45]. (a) Typical femtosecond laser induced microfringes on Zr-Ba alloy surface; (b) femtosecond laser induced microfringes on Zr-based metallic glass (Zr-BMG) surface
    Fig. 6. Comparison of femtosecond laser induced ripple structures[45]. (a) Typical femtosecond laser induced microfringes on Zr-Ba alloy surface; (b) femtosecond laser induced microfringes on Zr-based metallic glass (Zr-BMG) surface
    Surface morphologies of Fe-based metallic glass irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses[47]. (a) Regular ripple structure caused by one beam of femtosecond laser pulses; surface structures induced by two beams of femtosecond laser pulses at the time delay of (b) Δt=0 ps, (c) Δt=15 ps, and (d) Δt=30 ps. The interaction angle between the the two laser beams is φ=60°
    Fig. 7. Surface morphologies of Fe-based metallic glass irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses[47]. (a) Regular ripple structure caused by one beam of femtosecond laser pulses; surface structures induced by two beams of femtosecond laser pulses at the time delay of (b) Δt=0 ps, (c) Δt=15 ps, and (d) Δt=30 ps. The interaction angle between the the two laser beams is φ=60°
    XRD results of samples processed by femtosecond laser when copper back cooling plate was used[48]
    Fig. 8. XRD results of samples processed by femtosecond laser when copper back cooling plate was used[48]
    Comperison of typical flat re-solidified zone(ablation area) and ripple pattern zone(damaged area)[49]. (a) Flat re-solidified zone; (b) ripple pattern zone
    Fig. 9. Comperison of typical flat re-solidified zone(ablation area) and ripple pattern zone(damaged area)[49]. (a) Flat re-solidified zone; (b) ripple pattern zone
    Ultrafast laser cutting metallic glass cross-section diagrams. (a) 532 nm picosecond laser; (b) 800 nm femtosecond laser
    Fig. 10. Ultrafast laser cutting metallic glass cross-section diagrams. (a) 532 nm picosecond laser; (b) 800 nm femtosecond laser
    Zhaoyuan Xia, Jing Qian, Guande Wang, Danyang Shen, Kongyu Lou, Quanzhong Zhao. Research Progress on Ultrashort Pulsed Laser Processing of Metallic Glasses[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(15): 1516027
    Download Citation