Author Affiliations
1Institute of Flexible Electronic Technology of Tsinghua, Zhejiang, Jiaxing 314006, China2Center for Mechanics and Materials and Center for Flexible Electronics Technology, AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China3Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USAshow less
Fig. 1. (Color online) Methods and applications of thermally actuated reconfiguration. (a) Shape evolution of two morphable mesostructures made of shape-memory polymers. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2018, AAAS. (b) Shape evolution of LCE with mesogens aligned in groups. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [22]. Copyright 2015, AAAS. (c) Demonstration of a thermally actuated micro-tweezer made of SMA. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2007, IOP Publishing Ltd.
Fig. 2. (Color online) Methods and applications of chemically actuated reconfiguration. (a) Shape evolution of an ionoprinted hydrogel subject to different solvents. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2013, Macmillan Publishers Limited. (b) Schematic illustration of a 3D jump micro hydrogel device, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of embedded microfluidic channels. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2010, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Evolution of the micro hydrogel device induced with a liquid solvent. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2010, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) 2D-to-3D shape transformation of a tri-layer hydrogel subject to a variant pH. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [68]. Copyright 2014, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Fig. 3. (Color online) Methods and applications of optically actuated reconfiguration. (a) Bending of a cantilever made of LCE with azobenzene under the exposure of light with different polarization angles. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [80]. Copyright 2011, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Rolling of a LCE film induced through the application of visible and UV light. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2008, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (c) Shape evolution of a bilayer film with photo-initiated proton-releasing agent. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [ 67]. Copyright 2012, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 4. (Color online) Methods and applications of magnetically actuated reconfiguration. (a) Milli-robots made of magnetoelastic soft materials. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2018, Macmillan Publishers Limited. (b) Navigation of a ferromagnetic soft continuum robots through 3D cerebrovascular phantom network. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2019, AAAS.
Fig. 5. (Color online) Methods and applications of electrically actuated reconfiguration. (a) Schematic illustration of a robotic fish made of DE (left-hand panel), and forward motion of the fish (right-hand panel). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [110]. Copyright 2017, AAAS. (b) Shape reconfiguration of four actuators made of IPMC (top panel), and working process of a three-finger gripper (bottom panel). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [101]. Copyright 2008, Cambridge University Press. (c) Movement of an insect-scale robot made of PVDF. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright 2019, AAAS.
Fig. 6. (Color online) Methods and applications of mechanically actuated reconfiguration through the use of different strain release paths. (a) Illustration of the strategy through a sequence of FEA results and a pair of colorized SEM images for the two stable configurations. (b) SEM images and FEA predictions of morphable, recognizable objects. (c) Exploded view of the layer construction for a morphable electromagnetic device with shielding capability. (d) Optical images and FEA predictions of the device. (e) Simulated radiant efficiency of three antennas at two different stable shapes. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [137]. Copyright 2018, Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Fig. 7. (Color online) Methods and applications of mechanically actuated reconfiguration assisted by kirigami substrate designs. (a) Conceptual illustration of the fabrication process, through a sequence of FEA results. (b) Two-dimensional geometries, FEA predictions, and scanning electron microscope images of a 3D morphable trilayer microstructure as mechanically tunable optical chiral metamaterials. (c) Measured and simulated optical circular dichroism of the 3D trilayer microstructure with two 3D shapes in the 0.2–0.4-THz frequency range. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [5], Copyright 2019, National Academy of Sciences.
Stimuli type | Mechanism/material | Advantage | Disadvantage | Response time | Reference |
---|
Thermal stimuli | Shape-memory polymers | Remote actuation; Large actuation strain | Slow response Low actuation force | 15 min | [32]
| Thermally responsive hydrogel | Low transition temperature | Relatively slow response | 5–10 s | [37]
| Liquid crystal elastomers | Remote actuation; Complex reconfigurable geometry | Relatively slow response | 15 s | [22, 23]
| Shape-memory alloys | High energy density; Large actuation strain and force | Limited operating temperature; Low bandwidth | 0.15–14 s | [18, 140]
| Transition metal oxides | Remote actuation; High work density; Fast response | Low bandwidth | 0.34–12.5 ms | [19, 141]
| Chemical stimuli | Swelling deformation/
hydrogel
| Fast response possible biocompatible | Sensitive to environment | 0.4 s –1 min | [51, 60, 63]
| Swelling deformation/
inorganic materials
| Large actuation force | Sensitive to environment | 3.4 s | [65]
| Change of swelling ratio | Biocompatible | Slow response; Sensitive to environment | 10 min | [52]
| Optical stimuli | Direct activation | Remote actuation; Fast response | Low thermal stability | 12.5 ms | [73, 75, 142]
| Indirect activation | Remote actuation | Relatively slow response | 30 s | [67]
| Magnetic stimuli | Conventional polymer fabrication with magnetic particles | Remote actuation; Fast response; Multiple reconfigurable geometry | Low actuation force for microscale structures | < 0.25 s | [88]
| Additive manufacture with magnetic particles | Remote actuation; Fast response complex initial geometry | Low actuation force for microscale structures | < 0.5 s | [95]
| Individual magnets | Remote actuation; Fast response | Challenging to scale down to microscale | 0.4 s | [98, 99, 143]
| Electric stimuli | Dielectric elastomers | Large actuation strain; Fast response | High voltage | < 1 ms | [144]
| Ionic polymer-metal composites | Low voltage | Relatively slow response | 14 s | [105]
| Piezoelectric materials | Stable thermal and chemical properties; High power density;
Fast response
| Relatively high voltage | < 5 ms | [121]
| Mechanical stimuli | Strain release paths of substrates | Parallel reconfiguration; Diverse compatible material; Large applicable length scale; Multiple and complex reconfigurable geometry | Relatively slow response | > 20 s | [137, 139]
|
|
Table 1. Summary of reconfiguration methods.