• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 21, 210401 (2020)
Li Xiang, Wang Lixin*, and Duan Zhiqiang
Author Affiliations
  • 火箭军工程大学导弹工程学院, 陕西 西安 710025
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.210401 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Li Xiang, Wang Lixin, Duan Zhiqiang. Application of Improved Adaptive Wavelet Noise Reduction in Laser Gyroscope Signal Processing[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(21): 210401 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of wavelet noise reduction
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of wavelet noise reduction
    Hard threshold function
    Fig. 2. Hard threshold function
    Soft threshold function
    Fig. 3. Soft threshold function
    Adaptive threshold function
    Fig. 4. Adaptive threshold function
    Curves comparison of different functions
    Fig. 5. Curves comparison of different functions
    Process of determining optimal number of decomposition levels
    Fig. 6. Process of determining optimal number of decomposition levels
    Signal data collected by three-axis laser gyroscope. (a) X-axis; (b) Y-axis; (c) Z-axis
    Fig. 7. Signal data collected by three-axis laser gyroscope. (a) X-axis; (b) Y-axis; (c) Z-axis
    Allan variance logarithm curves of static raw data
    Fig. 8. Allan variance logarithm curves of static raw data
    Comparison of effects of commonly used noise reduction methods. (a) Original signal; (b) TAWF; (c) standard KF; (d) IAWF
    Fig. 9. Comparison of effects of commonly used noise reduction methods. (a) Original signal; (b) TAWF; (c) standard KF; (d) IAWF
    Allan variance curves of noise reduction signal under different methods
    Fig. 10. Allan variance curves of noise reduction signal under different methods
    Effect of IAWF method after processing noise
    Fig. 11. Effect of IAWF method after processing noise
    Test device for experimental car
    Fig. 12. Test device for experimental car
    Noise reduction effect of different filtering methods
    Fig. 13. Noise reduction effect of different filtering methods
    Calculation results of entropy values. (a) Energy entropy of detail coefficient; (b) energy entropy of approximate coefficient; (c) energy entropy of detail ratio
    Fig. 14. Calculation results of entropy values. (a) Energy entropy of detail coefficient; (b) energy entropy of approximate coefficient; (c) energy entropy of detail ratio
    Dynamic noise reduction effect under different decomposition layers
    Fig. 15. Dynamic noise reduction effect under different decomposition layers
    Detailed enlarged view of Fig. 15
    Fig. 16. Detailed enlarged view of Fig. 15
    AxisQ/(″)N/[(°)·h-0.5]B/[(°)·h-1]K/[(°)·h-3/2]R/[(°)·h-2]
    X0.0032720.0002930.0204500.0345610.016807
    Y0.0000690.0000690.0070670.0119560.005816
    Z0.0006670.0001520.0099400.0167940.008166
    Table 1. Noise figures of original signal
    MethodQ/(″)N/[(°)·h-0.5]B/[(°)·h-1]K/[(°)·h-3/2]R/[(°)·h-2]
    Original signal0.0032720.0002930.0204500.0345610.016807
    TAWF0.0000220.0000030.0001790.0003040.000148
    KF0.0010800.0000970.0067540.0114140.005551
    IAWF0.0000010.0000010.0000090.0000160.000008
    Table 2. Noise figures of signal
    Li Xiang, Wang Lixin, Duan Zhiqiang. Application of Improved Adaptive Wavelet Noise Reduction in Laser Gyroscope Signal Processing[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(21): 210401
    Download Citation