Author Affiliations
1Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, China;2CAS Key Laboratory of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, China;show less
Fig. 1. Primary mirror sectors and segment numbering scheme of TMT
Fig. 2. Sag and asphericity of TMT segments after rotation and translation. (a) Max sag and max asphericity of TMT segments as functions of off-axis distance; (b) sag distribution and (c) asphericity distribution of TMT segment with off-axis distance of 13.99 m
Fig. 3. Measurement light path of refraction and diffraction mixed compensation using large aperture off-axis mirror
Fig. 4. Layout of aplanatic lens test
Fig. 5. Simulation of TMT segment test using refraction and diffraction mixed compensation. (a) Layout of simulation; (b) wavefront residual error; (c) spot diagram of multiple diffraction orders
Fig. 6. First 15 Zernike fringe polynomial coefficients of CGH phase function after normalization
Fig. 7. Distortion ratio of different off-axis TMT segments obtained by CGH refraction and diffraction mixed detection method and CGH direct detection method. (a) Distortion ratio as a function of off-axis distance obtained by different methods; (b) phase of CGH obtained by direction compensation for 13.99 m off-axis distance TMT segment; (c) phase of CGH obtained by refraction and diffraction mixed detection for 13.99 m off-axis distance TMT segment with lens
Fig. 8. Layout of CGH
Fig. 9. Simulation of trial CGH refraction and diffraction mixed compensation. (a) Phase distribution of CGH; (b) wavefront residual error
Fig. 10. Actual test optical path of CGH refraction and diffraction mixed compensation of trial mirror
Fig. 11. Test results of CGH refraction and diffraction mixed compensation of trial mirror. (a) Interferogram; (b) surface test result
Fig. 12. Test result calibration of trial mirror. (a) Error calibration of aplanatic lens; (b) surface test result of trial mirror after calibration
Fig. 13. Test result of trial mirror CGH autocollimation method
Element | Distancetolerance /μm | WavefrontRMS /nm | Tilttolerance /(') | WavefrontRMS /nm |
---|
| 10 (dx) | 2.210 | 5 (tilt x) | 2.192 | CGH | 10 (dy) | 2.204 | 5 (tilt y) | 2.212 | | 50 (dz) | 4.147 | 100 (tilt z) | 2.210 | | 100 (dx) | 2.210 | 5 (tilt x) | 2.348 | Aplanaticlens | 100 (dy) | 2.304 | 5 (tilt y) | 2.330 | | 1000 (dz) | 2.211 | 100 (tilt z) | 2.210 | Off-axissegment | 100 (dx) | 2.210 | | | | 100 (dy) | 2.210 | | |
|
Table 1. Element adjustment tolerance and wavefront aberration change of testing system for refraction and diffraction mixed compensation
Off-axisdistance /mm | Distortion ratio ofCGH without lens | Distortion ratio ofCGH with lens | Off-axisdistance /mm | Distortion ratio ofCGH without lens | Distortion ratio ofCGH with lens |
---|
2170 | 1.023 | 1.007 | 8651 | 1.602 | 1.105 | 3313 | 1.059 | 1.017 | 9744 | 1.976 | 1.131 | 4337 | 1.102 | 1.028 | 10794 | 2.508 | 1.157 | 5006 | 1.138 | 1.037 | 11876 | 4.022 | 1.189 | 6254 | 1.240 | 1.057 | 12923 | 7.762 | 1.218 | 7499 | 1.384 | 1.081 | 13994 | 12.523 | 1.248 |
|
Table 2. Distortion ratio of different off-axis TMT segments obtained by CGH refraction and diffraction mixed detection method and CGH direct detection method
Error type | RMS error |
---|
CGH patterning error | 0.005λ | CGH substrate shape | 0.005λ | CGH encoding error | 0.006λ | Wavefront of aplanatic lens | 0.0176λ | Adjustment error | 0.01λ | Total error | 0.0107λ |
|
Table 3. Error of trial mirror test using refraction and diffraction mixed compensation