• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 41, Issue 10, 3200 (2021)
Location map of test area
Fig. 1. Location map of test area
Overall structure diagram
Fig. 2. Overall structure diagram
Original spectra and the curves after removing the spectral envelopes of samples under different injury levels
Fig. 3. Original spectra and the curves after removing the spectral envelopes of samples under different injury levels
Hyperspectral remote sensing image of UAV
Fig. 4. Hyperspectral remote sensing image of UAV
Spatial distribution of pest injury levels in sampling area
Fig. 5. Spatial distribution of pest injury levels in sampling area
植被指数名称计算公式
SAVI土壤调节植被指数1.5(ρ870-ρ680)/(ρ870+ρ680+0.5)
PSNDa归一化色素差值指数a(ρ800-ρ690)/(R800+ρ690)
PSNDb归一化色素差值指数b(ρ800-ρ635)/(ρ800+ρ635)
mND705修正归一化差值指数(ρ750-ρ705)/(ρ750+ρ705-2ρ445)
VOGaVogelman指数aρ740750
mSR705改进比值植被指数(ρ750-ρ445)/(ρ705+ρ445)
DD双重差异指数(ρ750-ρ720)-(ρ700+ρ670)
NDI归一化差异指数(ρ750-ρ705)/(ρ750+ρ705)
GNDVI绿光归一化植被指数(ρ750-ρ550)/(ρ750+ρ550)
Table 1. Vegetation index and its calculation formula
参数名称定义
Depth560绿峰吸收深度在560 nm处的吸收深度
AreaG绿峰吸收面积在500~610 nm之间包络线与光谱反射率之间的面积
AreaR红边吸收面积在680~760 nm之间包络线与光谱反射率之间的面积
λR红边位置在680~760 nm之间反射率的一阶导数红边最大值位置
dλR红边振幅在680~760 nm之间反射率的一阶导数红边最大值
SDR红边面积在680~760 nm之间反射率的一阶导数红边面积
SDR-SDB面积差值红边面积与蓝边面积的差值
Table 2. Spectral characteristic parameters and its definitions
函数ρ400ρ406ρ586ρ593ρ689ρ876常数方差/%
y1788.24961.86-382.94422.87-204.3240.16-5.7189.3
y23721.39-3461.94-101.38-109.9274.465.53-0.209.7
y3-6028.946204.72352.27-646.97222.934.72-5.741.0
Table 3. Discriminant function based on the original spectrum
函数ρ403ρ406ρ409ρ412ρ505ρ515ρ735ρ749常数方差/%
y1-113.40-18.91157.03-49.78-51.9214.14194.80-376.44239.6588.3
y259.12-262.4482.0999.94-74.5342.7126.86-5.1718.749.1
y344.92-162.80-194.94203.22120.66-78.28-23.3386.4624.462.7
Table 4. Discriminant function based on the spectrum after removing the envelope
函数PSNDaPSNDbmND705mSR705NDISAVIVOGaDDGNDVI常数方差/%
y1-32.64-53.58-764.78-7.54224.8519.12116.4424.52-1.15-97.1087.2
y2-64.1113.36136.3320.61-162.59-5.76132.7135.0621.21-127.4611.0
y399.62-71.51121.129.22-117.48-34.92140.24-107.9163.65-189.801.8
Table 5. Discriminant function based on canopy vegetation indexes
函数Depth560AreaRAreaGλRdλRSDRSDR-SDB常数方差/%
y141.840.620.23-68.530.03228.59-242.23-82.9584.0
y260.65-0.230.791829.17-0.15-264.07174.6853.3714.2
y3156.170.101.84-461.90-0.08324.33-239.62-122.101.8
Table 6. Discriminant function based on canopy spectral parameters
特征检验精度/%Kappa
系数
R2
健康轻度中度重度总体
原始光谱92.073.382.484.884.40.790.89
去包络线96.060.070.684.881.10.740.88
植被指数96.073.370.678.879.70.740.88
光谱参数92.073.364.784.878.70.760.85
Table 7. Different feature discriminant function accuracies
采样
区域
健康轻度虫害中度虫害重度虫害总面积
/m2
面积/m2比例/%面积/m2比例/%面积/m2比例/%面积/m2比例/%
洋门A222.162.321 395.0914.562 530.4526.415 432.3056.709 580
洋门B855.036.474 228.6232.015 893.7144.622 231.6416.8913 209
上湖A4 815.1343.892 004.4418.273 410.1331.09740.306.7510 970
上湖B2 700.8143.911 470.3423.901 793.4929.16186.363.036 151
Table 8. Test results of Phyllostachys Edulis Pest