• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 7, Issue 5, 543 (2019)
You-Zeng Hao1、2, Fu-Li Wang1、2, Min Tang1、2, Hai-Zhong Weng1、2, Yue-De Yang1、2, Jin-Long Xiao1、2, and Yong-Zhen Huang1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000543 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    You-Zeng Hao, Fu-Li Wang, Min Tang, Hai-Zhong Weng, Yue-De Yang, Jin-Long Xiao, Yong-Zhen Huang. Widely tunable single-mode lasers based on a hybrid square/rhombus-rectangular microcavity[J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(5): 543 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the coupled-cavity laser composed of an FP cavity and a square/rhombus microcavity as a deformed square microcavity with a vertex extending a distance of δ, and the wave vectors for the mode light rays reflected from the sides of the SRM and the square microcavity.
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the coupled-cavity laser composed of an FP cavity and a square/rhombus microcavity as a deformed square microcavity with a vertex extending a distance of δ, and the wave vectors for the mode light rays reflected from the sides of the SRM and the square microcavity.
    Simulated reflectivity spectra at different gain levels obtained by FDTD simulation for an SRM connected to a vertex waveguide, with (a) the side length a=10 μm, the deformation amplitude δ=0.15 μm, and waveguide width d=2 μm and (b) a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm, and d=2 μm, respectively. (c) Reflectivity for the modes α1, α2, α3, and η for the mode α1 versus the deformation amplitude δ for an HSRRL with a=10 μm, d=2 μm, and L=300 μm.
    Fig. 2. Simulated reflectivity spectra at different gain levels obtained by FDTD simulation for an SRM connected to a vertex waveguide, with (a) the side length a=10  μm, the deformation amplitude δ=0.15  μm, and waveguide width d=2  μm and (b) a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm, and d=2  μm, respectively. (c) Reflectivity for the modes α1, α2, α3, and η for the mode α1 versus the deformation amplitude δ for an HSRRL with a=10  μm, d=2  μm, and L=300  μm.
    Mode intensity profiles of Hz in the (a) HSRRL, (b) SRM, and (c) FP cavity, and (d) simulated far-field intensity at 1541.5 nm.
    Fig. 3. Mode intensity profiles of Hz in the (a) HSRRL, (b) SRM, and (c) FP cavity, and (d) simulated far-field intensity at 1541.5 nm.
    Simulated far-field intensity profiles and mode intensity profiles of Hz of high-Q modes in the HSRRLs with a=10 μm, δ=0.15 μm, d=2 μm, and L=(a) 280 μm, (b) 290 μm, and (c) 310 μm, and the HSRL with a=10 μm, d=2 μm, and L=(d) 280 μm, (e) 290 μm, and (f) 310 μm. The proportions of the fundamental transverse mode in the FP cavity η are given for the coupled modes.
    Fig. 4. Simulated far-field intensity profiles and mode intensity profiles of Hz of high-Q modes in the HSRRLs with a=10  μm, δ=0.15  μm, d=2  μm, and L=(a) 280 μm, (b) 290 μm, and (c) 310 μm, and the HSRL with a=10  μm, d=2  μm, and L=(d) 280 μm, (e) 290 μm, and (f) 310 μm. The proportions of the fundamental transverse mode in the FP cavity η are given for the coupled modes.
    Microscopic image of an HSRRL with patterned p-electrodes for current injection into the SRM and FP cavities separately.
    Fig. 5. Microscopic image of an HSRRL with patterned p-electrodes for current injection into the SRM and FP cavities separately.
    Output powers coupled into an SMF versus IFP as ISRM is fixed at different currents for HSRRLs at L=300 μm, d=2 μm, with (a) a=10 μm, δ=0.15 μm and (b) a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm.
    Fig. 6. Output powers coupled into an SMF versus IFP as ISRM is fixed at different currents for HSRRLs at L=300  μm, d=2  μm, with (a) a=10  μm, δ=0.15  μm and (b) a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm.
    Lasing characteristics with the variations of IFP and ISRM for the HSRRL with a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm, d=2 μm, and L=300 μm. Lasing spectra (a) versus ISRM at IFP=64 mA and (b) versus IFP at ISRM=20 mA. Dominant lasing mode wavelengths and corresponding SMSRs (c) versus ISRM at IFP=64 mA and (d) versus IFP at ISRM=20 mA, respectively.
    Fig. 7. Lasing characteristics with the variations of IFP and ISRM for the HSRRL with a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm, d=2  μm, and L=300  μm. Lasing spectra (a) versus ISRM at IFP=64  mA and (b) versus IFP at ISRM=20  mA. Dominant lasing mode wavelengths and corresponding SMSRs (c) versus ISRM at IFP=64  mA and (d) versus IFP at ISRM=20  mA, respectively.
    Superimposed lasing spectra for HSRRLs at L=300 μm, d=2 μm with (a) a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm and (b) a=10 μm, δ=0.15 μm, and their corresponding SMSRs and peak powers at (c) a=15 μm and (d) a=10 μm.
    Fig. 8. Superimposed lasing spectra for HSRRLs at L=300  μm, d=2  μm with (a) a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm and (b) a=10  μm, δ=0.15  μm, and their corresponding SMSRs and peak powers at (c) a=15  μm and (d) a=10  μm.
    Small single modulation responses of an HSRRL with a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm, L=300 μm, and d=2 μm. (a) Small signal modulation responses at IFP=30, 40, and 70 mA; (b) fitted resonance frequency and 3-dB bandwidth vary by the square root of the injection current of the FP cavity and as a function of (IFP−Ith)1/2 at ISRM=5 mA.
    Fig. 9. Small single modulation responses of an HSRRL with a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm, L=300  μm, and d=2  μm. (a) Small signal modulation responses at IFP=30, 40, and 70 mA; (b) fitted resonance frequency and 3-dB bandwidth vary by the square root of the injection current of the FP cavity and as a function of (IFPIth)1/2 at ISRM=5  mA.
    (a) 25-Gb/s and (b) 35-Gb/s eye diagrams for HSRRL with a=15 μm, δ=0.25 μm, d=2 μm, and L=300 μm at ISRM=14 mA and IFP=68 mA.
    Fig. 10. (a) 25-Gb/s and (b) 35-Gb/s eye diagrams for HSRRL with a=15  μm, δ=0.25  μm, d=2  μm, and L=300  μm at ISRM=14  mA and IFP=68  mA.
    You-Zeng Hao, Fu-Li Wang, Min Tang, Hai-Zhong Weng, Yue-De Yang, Jin-Long Xiao, Yong-Zhen Huang. Widely tunable single-mode lasers based on a hybrid square/rhombus-rectangular microcavity[J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(5): 543
    Download Citation