• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 12, 1206004 (2020)
Jiaxiao Ma1, Yonghong Wang1、2、*, Mingyi Zhang1、2, Xiaoyu Bai1、2, and Songkui Sang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China
  • 2Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.1206004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiaxiao Ma, Yonghong Wang, Mingyi Zhang, Xiaoyu Bai, Songkui Sang. Static-Pressure Penetration Field Test of PHC Pipe Pile Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 1206004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure diagram of the low-temperature-sensitive FBG strain sensor
    Fig. 1. Structure diagram of the low-temperature-sensitive FBG strain sensor
    Structure diagram of FBG temperature sensor
    Fig. 2. Structure diagram of FBG temperature sensor
    Schematic diagram of strain calibration
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of strain calibration
    Strain calibration curve of FBG strain sensor
    Fig. 4. Strain calibration curve of FBG strain sensor
    Temperature calibration curve of FBG strain sensor
    Fig. 5. Temperature calibration curve of FBG strain sensor
    Temperature calibration curve of FBG temperature sensor
    Fig. 6. Temperature calibration curve of FBG temperature sensor
    sensors installation
    Fig. 7. sensors installation
    Shallow groove filled with epoxy resin
    Fig. 8. Shallow groove filled with epoxy resin
    Schematic diagram of sensor installation position and static pressure pile
    Fig. 9. Schematic diagram of sensor installation position and static pressure pile
    Temperature difference versus time
    Fig. 10. Temperature difference versus time
    TP1 penetration resistance curve with depth
    Fig. 11. TP1 penetration resistance curve with depth
    TP2 penetration resistance curve with depth
    Fig. 12. TP2 penetration resistance curve with depth
    Axial force of pile TP1
    Fig. 13. Axial force of pile TP1
    Axial force of pile TP2
    Fig. 14. Axial force of pile TP2
    Unit side friction resistance of pile TP1
    Fig. 15. Unit side friction resistance of pile TP1
    Unit side friction resistance of pile TP2
    Fig. 16. Unit side friction resistance of pile TP2
    Soil typeSoildescriptionDepth /mWatercontent /%Unitweight /(kN·m-2)Void ratioCohesion /kPaInternalfrictionangle /(°)Compressionmodulus /MPa
    FillSoft plastic clay0.9-5.330.618.50.86713.86.84.1
    Silty soil A1Loose densesilty soil0.3-2.528.818.60.8038.720.18.1
    Silty clay B1Loose densesilty soil0.3-1.131.518.30.8916.97.34.6
    Silty clay B2Soft plastic clay0.3-1.930.918.30.87617.67.44.8
    Silty soil A2Medium densesilty soil0.7-4.028.318.70.7948.7218.7
    Silty clay B3Soft plastic toflow plastic clay2.6-4.631.718.30.89517.56.84.6
    Silty soil A3Medium densesilty soil0.8-3.828.318.70.79310.320.610.2
    Table 1. Parameters of soils
    Sampling frequency /s-1Dynamic range /nmRange /nmAccuracy /nmResolution /pm
    1±31500--1600±21
    Table 2. Parameters of FBG demodulator
    Jiaxiao Ma, Yonghong Wang, Mingyi Zhang, Xiaoyu Bai, Songkui Sang. Static-Pressure Penetration Field Test of PHC Pipe Pile Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 1206004
    Download Citation