• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 50, Issue 4, 20190565 (2021)
Yun Zhang, Bowen Liu, Huanyu Song, Yuan Li, Lu Chai, and Minglie Hu
Author Affiliations
  • Ultrafast Laser Laboratory, College of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20190565 Cite this Article
    Yun Zhang, Bowen Liu, Huanyu Song, Yuan Li, Lu Chai, Minglie Hu. Effects of gain distribution on self-similar amplification of picosecond pulses[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(4): 20190565 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The effects of gain distribution on self-similar amplification of picosecond pulses in a Yb-doped fiber laser system were studied by numerical simulation. Ultrashort laser pulses amplified in self-similar amplification theoretical model was established to analyze the impact of pump configuration, fiber length and total gain coefficient on the self-similar amplification evolution and laser output performance. Detailed numerical simulation reveals that the best self-similar amplification result can be found for different cases, where high-quality self-similar pulses with ~100 fs transform-limited pulse duration are obtained. It is demonstrated that the self-similar evolution speed in a forward-pumping scheme is faster than that in a backward-pumping scheme for a fixed seed pulse. Furthermore, the results indicate that for the self-similar amplifier with different fiber lengths and gain coefficients, the forward-pumping scheme shows better evolution results in lower seed energy and longer wavelength range, while the backward-pumping scheme is more suitable for the higher seed energy and shorter wavelength range.
    $i\frac{{\partial A({\textit{z}},t)}}{{\partial {\textit{z}}}} = \frac{{{\beta _2}}}{2}\frac{{{\partial ^2}A({\textit{z}},t)}}{{\partial {t^2}}} - \gamma {\left| {A({\textit{z}},t)} \right|^2}A({\textit{z}},t)$(1)

    View in Article

    ${N_2}({\textit{z}}) = \frac{{\dfrac{{{\lambda _p}}}{{{A_p}hc}}{\sigma _a}({\lambda _p}){P_p}({\textit{z}}) + \dfrac{1}{{{A_s}hc}} \displaystyle\sum\limits_k {{\lambda _k}{\sigma _a}({\lambda _k}){P_s}({\lambda _k},{\textit{z}})} }}{{\dfrac{{{\lambda _p}}}{{{A_p}hc}}\left[ {{\sigma _a}({\lambda _p}) + {\sigma _e}({\lambda _p})} \right]{P_p}({\textit{z}}) + \dfrac{1}{\tau } + \dfrac{1}{{{A_s}hc}} \displaystyle\sum\limits_k {{\lambda _k}\left[ {{\sigma _a}({\lambda _k}) + {\sigma _e}({\lambda _k})} \right]{P_s}({\lambda _k},{\textit{z}})} }}{N_{Yb}}$(2)

    View in Article

    ${N_1}({\textit{z}}) = {N_{Yb}} - {N_2}({\textit{z}})$(3)

    View in Article

    $ - \frac{{{\rm d}{P_p}({\textit{z}})}}{{{\rm d}{\textit{z}}}} = \left[ {{\sigma _e}\left( {{\lambda _p}} \right){N_2}({\textit{z}}) - {\sigma _a}({\lambda _p}){N_1}({\textit{z}})} \right]{P_p}({\textit{z}}){\varGamma _p}$(4)

    View in Article

    $\frac{{{\rm d}{P_s}({\textit{z}})}}{{{\rm d}{\textit{z}}}} = \sum\limits_k {\left[ {{\sigma _e}\left( {{\lambda _k}} \right){N_2}({\textit{z}}) - {\sigma _a}({\lambda _k}){N_1}({\textit{z}})} \right]{P_s}({\textit{z}},{\lambda _k}){\varGamma _s}} $(5)

    View in Article

    ${M^2} = \frac{{\displaystyle\int {{{\left( {{{\left| A \right|}^2} - {{\left| {{A_p}} \right|}^2}} \right)}^2}{\rm d}t} }}{{{{\displaystyle\int {\left| A \right|} }^4}{\rm d}t}}$(6)

    View in Article

    $SR{\rm{ = }}\frac{{1/{{\displaystyle\int {\left| {{A_c}} \right|} }^2}{\rm d}t}}{{1/\displaystyle\int {{{\left| {{A_{TL}}} \right|}^2}} {\rm d}t}}$(7)

    View in Article

    Yun Zhang, Bowen Liu, Huanyu Song, Yuan Li, Lu Chai, Minglie Hu. Effects of gain distribution on self-similar amplification of picosecond pulses[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(4): 20190565
    Download Citation