• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 8, Issue 2, 026901 (2023)
Cheng-Jian Xiao*, Guang-Wei Meng, and Ying-Kui Zhao
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0119240 Cite this Article
    Cheng-Jian Xiao, Guang-Wei Meng, Ying-Kui Zhao. Theoretical model of radiation heat wave in two-dimensional cylinder with sleeve[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2023, 8(2): 026901 Copy Citation Text show less
    Energy transport of a two-dimensional Marshak wave. Boundary A corresponds to the source surface and boundary B to the interface between the low-Z and high-Z materials. The red and gray regions are the heated and unheated low-Z foam, respectively. The yellow region is the high-Z material.
    Fig. 1. Energy transport of a two-dimensional Marshak wave. Boundary A corresponds to the source surface and boundary B to the interface between the low-Z and high-Z materials. The red and gray regions are the heated and unheated low-Z foam, respectively. The yellow region is the high-Z material.
    Schematic of the Marshak waves in the cylinder at time t, where the R–Z profile is chosen. The gray part corresponds to the unheated material. The green and yellow parts correspond to the heated low-Z foam and the high-Z wall, respectively. The heat front positions of the Marshak waves in the low-Z foam and high-Z wall are xFZ(t) and xFR(z,t), respectively.
    Fig. 2. Schematic of the Marshak waves in the cylinder at time t, where the RZ profile is chosen. The gray part corresponds to the unheated material. The green and yellow parts correspond to the heated low-Z foam and the high-Z wall, respectively. The heat front positions of the Marshak waves in the low-Z foam and high-Z wall are xFZ(t) and xFR(z,t), respectively.
    Heat front position xF as a function of time t. The black dashed and red solid curves show the results with and without a lossy wall, respectively.
    Fig. 3. Heat front position xF as a function of time t. The black dashed and red solid curves show the results with and without a lossy wall, respectively.
    Simulation results for the energy deposited in the low-Z foam per unit cross-sectional area of the foam cylinder, ẼFoam, for the process with a lossy wall and TDrive = 150 eV.
    Fig. 4. Simulation results for the energy deposited in the low-Z foam per unit cross-sectional area of the foam cylinder, ẼFoam, for the process with a lossy wall and TDrive = 150 eV.
    Effective drive temperature for the process without a lossy wall. With this drive source, the ẼFoam of the process without a lossy wall is the same as that for the process with a lossy wall and TDrive = 150 eV.
    Fig. 5. Effective drive temperature for the process without a lossy wall. With this drive source, the ẼFoam of the process without a lossy wall is the same as that for the process with a lossy wall and TDrive = 150 eV.
    Error due to the Hammer–Rosen solutions. Here, Ratio and τ′ are defined as xFHR/xFMULTI and xFMULTI/lR′, respectively, where xFHR and xFMULTI are the heat front positions from the Hammer–Rosen solutions and the MULTI2D code, and lR′ is the Rosseland free path of the heated material with temperature that at the source position.
    Fig. 6. Error due to the Hammer–Rosen solutions. Here, Ratio and τ′ are defined as xFHR/xFMULTI and xFMULTI/lR, respectively, where xFHR and xFMULTI are the heat front positions from the Hammer–Rosen solutions and the MULTI2D code, and lR is the Rosseland free path of the heated material with temperature that at the source position.
    Numerical results in the case of a constant drive temperature for (a) energy loss EWall, (b) deposited energy EFoam, and (c) heat front position xF from the simulations (black dashed curves) and our model (red solid curves).
    Fig. 7. Numerical results in the case of a constant drive temperature for (a) energy loss EWall, (b) deposited energy EFoam, and (c) heat front position xF from the simulations (black dashed curves) and our model (red solid curves).
    Time-dependent drive temperature, which first increases and then decreases.
    Fig. 8. Time-dependent drive temperature, which first increases and then decreases.
    Numerical results in the case of a time-dependent drive temperature for (a) energy loss EWall, (b) deposited energy EFoam, and (c) heat front position xF from simulations (blue dotted curves), our model (red solid curves), and Ref. 38 (black dashed curves).
    Fig. 9. Numerical results in the case of a time-dependent drive temperature for (a) energy loss EWall, (b) deposited energy EFoam, and (c) heat front position xF from simulations (blue dotted curves), our model (red solid curves), and Ref. 38 (black dashed curves).
    EWall (kJ)EFoam (kJ)xF (cm)
    Process (MFoam, TDrive, ρ, R)ModelSimulationModelSimulationModelSimulation
    I (SiO2, 150, 0.05, 0.043)0.3550.4400.7370.7060.1950.175
    II (CH, 150, 0.15, 0.034)0.09630.1100.9240.8440.06000.0547
    Table 1. Numerical results of the energy loss EWall, the deposited energy EFoam and the heat front position xF. The parameters in the square bracket are the material of the filled low-Z foam MFoam, the drive temperature TDrive (eV), the density of the filled foam ρ (g/cm3), and the radius of the foam cylinder R (cm).
    Cheng-Jian Xiao, Guang-Wei Meng, Ying-Kui Zhao. Theoretical model of radiation heat wave in two-dimensional cylinder with sleeve[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2023, 8(2): 026901
    Download Citation