Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Space Active Opto-Electronics Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. SD-CASSI system
Fig. 2. Data flow of the kth row measurement
Fig. 3. Comparison of two-dimensional random coding and multi-slot combination coding. (a) Two-dimensional random coding; (b) multi-slot combination coding
Fig. 4. Correspondence between the measured matrix and measured vector
Fig. 5. Coded sampling results and recovery results with different sampling rates. (a) Original image; (b) traditional sampling data; (c) coded sampling data; (d) 20% sampling recovery; (e) 50% sampling recovery; (f) 80% sampling recovery
Fig. 6. Comparison of spectral recovery results at different sampling rates
Fig. 7. Evaluation of recovery results for different sampling rates. (a) pSNR for spatial information recovery; (b) SCF for spectral information recovery
Fig. 8. Electronic multi-slot combined encoding hyperspectral imaging system based on liquid crystal light valve
Fig. 9. Imaging target and sampling results used in experiment. (a) Imaging target; (b) sampling results
Fig. 10. Recovery results of experiments with different sampling rates. (a) 20%; (b) 50%; (c) 80%
Fig. 11. Spectral recovery results at different positions. (a) Position 1 and position 2; (b) position 3 and position 4
Fig. 12. Recovery results under different sampling rates in outdoor experiments. (a) Data cube recovered at 80% sampling rate; (b) recovery result of spectral curve at position A under different sampling rates
Fig. 13. Calibration under different fields of view
Reconstruction algorithm | 20% | 50% | 80% | | |
---|
pSNR /dB | SCF | | | pSNR /dB | SCF | pSNR /dB | SCF |
---|
Basis pursuit[17] | 18.9 | 0.81 | 30.7 | 0.89 | 32.4 | 0.92 | Orthogonal matching pursuit | 24.6 | 0.85 | 33.8 | 0.91 | 38.5 | 0.96 | Iterative reweighted least squares[18] | 25.3 | 0.86 | 32.3 | 0.91 | 34.7 | 0.95 | Gradient projection[19] | 23.1 | 0.80 | 29.7 | 0.88 | 33.4 | 0.92 | Iterative soft thresholding[20] | 24.7 | 0.81 | 28.8 | 0.87 | 32.9 | 0.90 |
|
Table 1. Digital simulation results of different algorithms under different sample rates