Jiawei Yong, Youming Guo, Changhui Rao. Control method of adaptive optical system based on conjugate combined model of aberration[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2020, 49(9): 20190534

Search by keywords or author
- Infrared and Laser Engineering
- Vol. 49, Issue 9, 20190534 (2020)

Fig. 1. Correlation matrices of the Zernike modes over different concentric circles. (a) ω = 1; (b) ω = 0.8

Fig. 2. Counterbalance relationship between defocus and primary spherical

Fig. 3. Actuator arrangement of 61-element DM

Fig. 4. Sequence of Zernike polynomials

Fig. 5. Correction result of spherical aberration. (a) Original aberration; (b) Residual error after correction

Fig. 6. Fitting residual of each aberration

Fig. 7. The second kind of RMS decreasing amplitude ration matrix,corresponding aberration. (a) Z 12; (b) Z 11; (c) Z 17; (d) Z 16; (e) Z 24; (f) Z 23; (g) Z 22; (h) C 1
![[in Chinese]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 7. [in Chinese]

Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of L 1, L 2 and L 3 in RMS decreasing amplitude ration matrix

Fig. 9. Imaging quality corresponding to different correction degrees. (a) Strehl ratio; (b) Relative Strehl ratio

Fig. 10. Three cross sections of normalized intensity to each aberration type. (a) Z 12;(b) Z 11;(c) Z 17;(d) Z 16;(e) Z 24;(f) Z 23;(g) Z 22;(h) C 1

Fig. 11. Combined aberration C 1 and residuals after corrected by the two methods

Fig. 12. Simulated imaging results of extended target
|
Table 1.
Some results after correction of the second kind of aberrations
对第二类像差校正后的相关结果
|
Table 2.
Optimal correction degree and relative Strehl ratio corresponding to each aberration type
各像差类型对应的最优校正度和相对Strehl ratio
|
Table 3.
Comparison of imaging quality of extended target
扩展目标成像质量比较

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address