• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 36, Issue 3, 301003 (2016)
Chen Bo1、*, Yang Jing2, Li Xinyang3, Li Xiaoyang1, and Yang Xu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • 3[in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/aos201636.0301003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chen Bo, Yang Jing, Li Xinyang, Li Xiaoyang, Yang Xu. Comparison of Two Close-Loop Control Methods in Adaptive Optics with Wavefront Curvature Sensing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 301003 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    For adaptive optics with curvature sensor, two close-loop wavefront control techniques those based on direct fitting method and Laplacian eigenfunctions method are comparative analyzed. The basic principles of two methods are analyzed, and then a numerical simulation model of 36-element curvature adaptive optics is setup and simulations of atmospheric turbulence wavefront aberration correction are carried out. The results show that, comparing with the direct fitting method, the stability and correction accuracy of Laplacian eigenfunctions method are obvious better when the proper modes are chosen, and the stability and accuracy of the direct fitting method are significantly worse when the phase distortion is larger.
    Chen Bo, Yang Jing, Li Xinyang, Li Xiaoyang, Yang Xu. Comparison of Two Close-Loop Control Methods in Adaptive Optics with Wavefront Curvature Sensing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 301003
    Download Citation