Fig. 1. Design optimization process of the all-optical switch. (a) General configuration of the all-optical switch. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
Fig. 2. Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical switch. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (d) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (e) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical switch. (f) The simulation and experiment results of the all-optical switch ON/OFF contrast.
Fig. 3. Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=0 fs. (b–d) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=40 fs, 80 fs and 100 fs, respectively. (e) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm-1600 nm. (f) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm.
Fig. 4. Design optimization process of all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) General configuration of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
Fig. 5. Characterization of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) The “01” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “10” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “11” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)image of the XOR logic gate. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (e) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (f) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical XOR logic gate.
Fig. 6. Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit.(a) General configuration of the all-optical integrated circuit. (b) The “11” input (“ON” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “10” input (“ON” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) The “01” input (“OFF” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (e) The “00” input (“OFF” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation.
Fig. 7. Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical integrated circuit. The size of the optimized area was 2.5 μm×7 μm. (b) Simulation results of the transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit. (c) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit.
Switch | XOR logic gate | Switch1 | Switch2 | Signal1 | Signal2 | Output | OFF | OFF | 0 | 0 | 0 | ON | OFF | 1 | 0 | 1 | OFF | ON | 0 | 1 | 1 | ON | ON | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
Table 0. The “ON” and “OFF” state of the all-optical switch and the true value of the XOR logic gate in the integrated photonics circuit.
Logic signal 1 | Logic signal 2 | Identifying result | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 01 | 01 | 0 | 01 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 01 | 1 | 00 | 00 | 0 |
|
Table 0. The two-digit state of logic signal 1 and logic signal 2 of the all-optical integrated photonic circuit and the identifying result.