• Opto-Electronic Advances
  • Vol. 5, Issue 10, 210061 (2022)
Huixin Qi, Zhuochen Du, Xiaoyong Hu*, Jiayu Yang, Saisai Chu**, and Qihuang Gong
Author Affiliations
  • [in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2022.210061 Cite this Article
    Huixin Qi, Zhuochen Du, Xiaoyong Hu, Jiayu Yang, Saisai Chu, Qihuang Gong. High performance integrated photonic circuit based on inverse design method[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2022, 5(10): 210061 Copy Citation Text show less
    Design optimization process of the all-optical switch. (a) General configuration of the all-optical switch. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
    Fig. 1. Design optimization process of the all-optical switch. (a) General configuration of the all-optical switch. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
    Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical switch. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (d) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (e) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical switch. (f) The simulation and experiment results of the all-optical switch ON/OFF contrast.
    Fig. 2. Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical switch. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (d) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (e) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical switch. (f) The simulation and experiment results of the all-optical switch ON/OFF contrast.
    Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=0 fs. (b–d) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=40 fs, 80 fs and 100 fs, respectively. (e) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm-1600 nm. (f) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm.
    Fig. 3. Characterization of the all-optical switch. (a) The “OFF” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=0 fs. (b–d) The “ON” state of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation at t=40 fs, 80 fs and 100 fs, respectively. (e) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm-1600 nm. (f) Transmission of the output of the all-optical switch under different delay time at 1500 nm.
    Design optimization process of all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) General configuration of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
    Fig. 4. Design optimization process of all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) General configuration of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (b) The initialization and discrete optimization permittivity distribution in the x-y two-dimensional cross-section, where bias=0 and bias=infinity.
    Characterization of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) The “01” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “10” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “11” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)image of the XOR logic gate. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (e) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (f) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical XOR logic gate.
    Fig. 5. Characterization of the all-optical XOR logic gate. (a) The “01” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (b) The “10” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “11” input of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)image of the XOR logic gate. The size of the optimized area was 2 μm×2 μm. (e) Simulation results of the transmission of all-optical switch. (f) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of all-optical XOR logic gate.
    Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit.(a) General configuration of the all-optical integrated circuit. (b) The “11” input (“ON” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “10” input (“ON” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) The “01” input (“OFF” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (e) The “00” input (“OFF” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation.
    Fig. 6. Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit.(a) General configuration of the all-optical integrated circuit. (b) The “11” input (“ON” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (c) The “10” input (“ON” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (d) The “01” input (“OFF” and ”ON” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation. (e) The “00” input (“OFF” and ”OFF” states) of normalized intensity distribution in the x-y plane from theoretical calculation.
    Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical integrated circuit. The size of the optimized area was 2.5 μm×7 μm. (b) Simulation results of the transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit. (c) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit.
    Fig. 7. Characterization of the all-optical integrated circuit. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the all-optical integrated circuit. The size of the optimized area was 2.5 μm×7 μm. (b) Simulation results of the transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit. (c) Experiment results of the normalized transmission of the all-optical integrated circuit.
    SwitchXOR logic gate
    Switch1Switch2Signal1Signal2Output
    OFFOFF000
    ONOFF101
    OFFON011
    ONON110
    Table 0. The “ON” and “OFF” state of the all-optical switch and the true value of the XOR logic gate in the integrated photonics circuit.
    Logic signal 1Logic signal 2Identifying result
    10100
    10111
    11101
    11110
    01010
    01111
    11011
    00000
    Table 0. The two-digit state of logic signal 1 and logic signal 2 of the all-optical integrated photonic circuit and the identifying result.
    Huixin Qi, Zhuochen Du, Xiaoyong Hu, Jiayu Yang, Saisai Chu, Qihuang Gong. High performance integrated photonic circuit based on inverse design method[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2022, 5(10): 210061
    Download Citation