• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 7, Issue 10, 1161 (2019)
Zhao Shi1,†, He Ding2,†, Hao Hong3, Dali Cheng1..., Kamran Rajabi1, Jian Yang2, Yongtian Wang2, Lai Wang1, Yi Luo1, Kaihui Liu3 and Xing Sheng1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Electronic Engineering and Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2Beijing Engineering Research Center of Mixed Reality and Advanced Display, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, and School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.001161 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhao Shi, He Ding, Hao Hong, Dali Cheng, Kamran Rajabi, Jian Yang, Yongtian Wang, Lai Wang, Yi Luo, Kaihui Liu, Xing Sheng, "Ultrafast and low-power optoelectronic infrared-to-visible upconversion devices," Photonics Res. 7, 1161 (2019) Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the optoelectronic upconversion device structure, including a red-emitting AlGaInP LED, a DBR, and a GaAs double-junction photodiode (DJPD), epitaxially grown on a GaAs substrate. The schematic of the corresponding circuit model is also shown, illustrating the upconversion mechanism. (b) Colorized SEM image (tilted view) of a fully fabricated device, showing designed LED (red color) and PD (gray color) components interconnected with metal wire (yellow color). (c) Top view, microscopic images of fabricated devices with different PD sizes (side length: 200 μm, 300 μm, 400 μm, 500 μm, 700 μm, 1000 μm, with a fixed LED size of 80 μm×80 μm) or LED sizes (side length: 80 μm, 150 μm, 200 μm, 250 μm, with a fixed PD size of 700 μm×700 μm) under the excitation of near-IR light (810 nm).
    Fig. 1. (a) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the optoelectronic upconversion device structure, including a red-emitting AlGaInP LED, a DBR, and a GaAs double-junction photodiode (DJPD), epitaxially grown on a GaAs substrate. The schematic of the corresponding circuit model is also shown, illustrating the upconversion mechanism. (b) Colorized SEM image (tilted view) of a fully fabricated device, showing designed LED (red color) and PD (gray color) components interconnected with metal wire (yellow color). (c) Top view, microscopic images of fabricated devices with different PD sizes (side length: 200 μm, 300 μm, 400 μm, 500 μm, 700 μm, 1000 μm, with a fixed LED size of 80μm×80μm) or LED sizes (side length: 80 μm, 150 μm, 200 μm, 250 μm, with a fixed PD size of 700μm×700μm) under the excitation of near-IR light (810 nm).
    (a) Measured TRPL decay curves for representative devices with different PD sizes (indicated in area) and a fixed LED size of 80 μm×80 μm. (b) Measured PL decay time as a function of PD size (red dots, with error bars included), in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line). (c) Measured TRPL decay curves for representative devices with different LED sizes (indicated in area) and a fixed PD size of 700 μm×700 μm. (d) Measured PL decay time as a function of LED size (red dots, with error bars included), in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line). For all curves, the maximum PL intensities are normalized to unity.
    Fig. 2. (a) Measured TRPL decay curves for representative devices with different PD sizes (indicated in area) and a fixed LED size of 80μm×80μm. (b) Measured PL decay time as a function of PD size (red dots, with error bars included), in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line). (c) Measured TRPL decay curves for representative devices with different LED sizes (indicated in area) and a fixed PD size of 700μm×700μm. (d) Measured PL decay time as a function of LED size (red dots, with error bars included), in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line). For all curves, the maximum PL intensities are normalized to unity.
    (a) Microscopic image (top view) of an upconversion device emitting red light under near-IR illumination (LED size, 80 μm×80 μm; and PD size, 300 μm×300 μm). The green dashed square represents the edge of PD, and the white dots indicate the incident positions of focused IR laser spot. P1−P4 indicate four different incident points. (b) Measured TRPL decay curves of the upconversion device with different incident positions on the PD. (c) Measured PL decay time (red dots) as a function of the distance between the incident laser spot (P1−P4) and the nearest edge of the LED, in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line).
    Fig. 3. (a) Microscopic image (top view) of an upconversion device emitting red light under near-IR illumination (LED size, 80μm×80μm; and PD size, 300μm×300μm). The green dashed square represents the edge of PD, and the white dots indicate the incident positions of focused IR laser spot. P1P4 indicate four different incident points. (b) Measured TRPL decay curves of the upconversion device with different incident positions on the PD. (c) Measured PL decay time (red dots) as a function of the distance between the incident laser spot (P1P4) and the nearest edge of the LED, in comparison with the theoretically calculated curve (blue dashed line).
    (a) Measured TRPL decay curves for a representative upconversion device (LED size, 80 μm×80 μm; PD size, 300 μm×300 μm) at different temperatures. (b) Measured PL decay time (red dots) as a function of temperature.
    Fig. 4. (a) Measured TRPL decay curves for a representative upconversion device (LED size, 80μm×80μm; PD size, 300μm×300μm) at different temperatures. (b) Measured PL decay time (red dots) as a function of temperature.
    (a) Schematic overview of representative upconversion mechanisms, including lanthanide-based, TTA-based, QD-QW-based, and our optoelectronic-device-based upconversion designs. (b) A summary of upconversion lifetimes and typical excitation power densities for four different mechanisms.
    Fig. 5. (a) Schematic overview of representative upconversion mechanisms, including lanthanide-based, TTA-based, QD-QW-based, and our optoelectronic-device-based upconversion designs. (b) A summary of upconversion lifetimes and typical excitation power densities for four different mechanisms.
    Equivalent circuit of the IR-to-red optoelectronic upconversion device. The LED and DJPD are connected in series, and their capacitance and resistance render an RC delay.
    Fig. 6. Equivalent circuit of the IR-to-red optoelectronic upconversion device. The LED and DJPD are connected in series, and their capacitance and resistance render an RC delay.
    Zhao Shi, He Ding, Hao Hong, Dali Cheng, Kamran Rajabi, Jian Yang, Yongtian Wang, Lai Wang, Yi Luo, Kaihui Liu, Xing Sheng, "Ultrafast and low-power optoelectronic infrared-to-visible upconversion devices," Photonics Res. 7, 1161 (2019)
    Download Citation