• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 21, 210101 (2019)
Xiaoyu Zhang1, Sheng Cui2、*, Deming Liu2, and Yang Jiang1、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Physics, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • 2School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.210101 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaoyu Zhang, Sheng Cui, Deming Liu, Yang Jiang. Performance Analysis of Multi-Aperture Coherent Optical Receiver for Satellite-to-Ground Downlink[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(21): 210101 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure diagram of multi-aperture coherent optical receiver for downlink free space optical (FSO)communication
    Fig. 1. Structure diagram of multi-aperture coherent optical receiver for downlink free space optical (FSO)communication
    Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver model under clean air condition in weak turbulence
    Fig. 2. Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver model under clean air condition in weak turbulence
    Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver modelunder clean air condition in strong turbulence
    Fig. 3. Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver modelunder clean air condition in strong turbulence
    Relationship between receiving antenna diameter D and Rytov variance σR2
    Fig. 4. Relationship between receiving antenna diameter D and Rytov variance σR2
    Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in weak turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
    Fig. 5. Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in weak turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
    Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel with EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in strong turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
    Fig. 6. Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel with EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in strong turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
    Type of fogVisibility /mTransmittance hl
    Light fog10000.94
    Moderate fog5000.85
    Thick fog2500.67
    Dense fog700.36
    Table 1. Weather condition parameters for 1550-nm wavelength signal
    ParameterValue
    Height from receiver to ground h0 m0
    Satellite altitude H/km38000
    Wavelength λ/nm1550
    Wind velocity ω/(m·s-1)21
    Refractive index parameter A0/(10-14m-2/3)1.7
    Zenith angle ζ0-π/2
    Table 2. Simulation parameters of satellite-to-ground downlink
    Turbulence conditionAverage received power /dBm
    L=1, Aperturearea of AL=2, Aperturearea of A/2L=3, Aperturearea of A/3L=4, Aperturearea of A/4
    Weak turbulence-45.60-46.89(1.29)-47.41(1.81)-47.52(1.92)
    Strong turbulence-26.85-37.64(10.79)-41.13(14.28)-42.72(15.87)
    Table 3. Sensitivity for coherent point receiver model under clean air condition in weak turbulence and strong turbulence (BER is 10-6)
    TurbulenceconditionWeatherconditionSensitivity /dBm
    L=1, D=12 cmL=2, D=62 cmL=3, D=43 cmL=4, D=6 cm
    WeakturbulenceClear air-47.25-50.60(3.35)-52.45(5.20)-53.87(6.62)
    Light fog-46.96-50.35(3.39)-52.29(5.33)-53.58(6.62)
    Moderate fog-46.57-49.89(3.32)-51.80(5.23)-53.19(6.62)
    Thick fog-45.54-48.88(3.34)-50.77(5.23)-52.13(6.59)
    Dense fog-42.82-46.21(3.39)-48.07(5.25)-49.43(6.61)
    StrongturbulenceClear air-32.54-42.52(9.98)-46.86(14.32)-49.39(16.85)
    Light fog-32.27-42.24(9.97)-46.61(14.34)-49.12(16.85)
    Moderate fog-31.83-41.79(9.96)-46.17(14.34)-48.69(16.86)
    Thick fog-30.80-40.76(9.96)-45.13(14.33)-47.65(16.85)
    Dense fog-28.10-38.08(9.98)-42.43(14.33)-44.95(16.85)
    Table 4. Sensitivity for L-channel coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in weak turbulence and strong turbulence (BER is 10-6)
    Xiaoyu Zhang, Sheng Cui, Deming Liu, Yang Jiang. Performance Analysis of Multi-Aperture Coherent Optical Receiver for Satellite-to-Ground Downlink[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(21): 210101
    Download Citation