Author Affiliations
1College of Physics, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China2School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Structure diagram of multi-aperture coherent optical receiver for downlink free space optical (FSO)communication
Fig. 2. Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver model under clean air condition in weak turbulence
Fig. 3. Relationship between average received power and BER for EGC coherent point receiver modelunder clean air condition in strong turbulence
Fig. 4. Relationship between receiving antenna diameter D and Rytov variance σR2
Fig. 5. Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in weak turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
Fig. 6. Relationship between average received power and BER for L-channel with EGC coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in strong turbulence. (a) Clean air; (b) light fog; (c) moderate fog; (d) thick fog; (e) dense fog
Type of fog | Visibility /m | Transmittance hl |
---|
Light fog | 1000 | 0.94 | Moderate fog | 500 | 0.85 | Thick fog | 250 | 0.67 | Dense fog | 70 | 0.36 |
|
Table 1. Weather condition parameters for 1550-nm wavelength signal
Parameter | Value |
---|
Height from receiver to ground h0 m | 0 | Satellite altitude H/km | 38000 | Wavelength λ/nm | 1550 | Wind velocity ω/(m·s-1) | 21 | Refractive index parameter A0/(10-14m-2/3) | 1.7 | Zenith angle ζ | 0-π/2 |
|
Table 2. Simulation parameters of satellite-to-ground downlink
Turbulence condition | Average received power /dBm |
---|
L=1, Aperturearea of A | L=2, Aperturearea of A/2 | L=3, Aperturearea of A/3 | L=4, Aperturearea of A/4 |
---|
Weak turbulence | -45.60 | -46.89(1.29) | -47.41(1.81) | -47.52(1.92) | Strong turbulence | -26.85 | -37.64(10.79) | -41.13(14.28) | -42.72(15.87) |
|
Table 3. Sensitivity for coherent point receiver model under clean air condition in weak turbulence and strong turbulence (BER is 10-6)
Turbulencecondition | Weathercondition | Sensitivity /dBm |
---|
L=1, D=12 cm | L=2, D=6 cm | L=3, D=4 cm | L=4, D=6 cm |
---|
Weakturbulence | Clear air | -47.25 | -50.60(3.35) | -52.45(5.20) | -53.87(6.62) | Light fog | -46.96 | -50.35(3.39) | -52.29(5.33) | -53.58(6.62) | Moderate fog | -46.57 | -49.89(3.32) | -51.80(5.23) | -53.19(6.62) | Thick fog | -45.54 | -48.88(3.34) | -50.77(5.23) | -52.13(6.59) | Dense fog | -42.82 | -46.21(3.39) | -48.07(5.25) | -49.43(6.61) | Strongturbulence | Clear air | -32.54 | -42.52(9.98) | -46.86(14.32) | -49.39(16.85) | Light fog | -32.27 | -42.24(9.97) | -46.61(14.34) | -49.12(16.85) | Moderate fog | -31.83 | -41.79(9.96) | -46.17(14.34) | -48.69(16.86) | Thick fog | -30.80 | -40.76(9.96) | -45.13(14.33) | -47.65(16.85) | Dense fog | -28.10 | -38.08(9.98) | -42.43(14.33) | -44.95(16.85) |
|
Table 4. Sensitivity for L-channel coherent optical receiver model with diameter of D under different fog conditions in weak turbulence and strong turbulence (BER is 10-6)