• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 40, Issue 10, 3254 (2020)
Li YUAN, Bin SHI, Jian-cheng YU, Tian-yu TANG, Yuan YUAN, and Yan-lin TANG
Author Affiliations
  • School of Physics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)10-3254-06 Cite this Article
    Li YUAN, Bin SHI, Jian-cheng YU, Tian-yu TANG, Yuan YUAN, Yan-lin TANG. Application of Different Smoothing Ensemble CARS Algorithm in Spectral Discrimination of Black Tea Grade[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(10): 3254 Copy Citation Text show less
    Visible-near infrared spectra of black tea
    Fig. 1. Visible-near infrared spectra of black tea
    Characteristic variables selected by MA-ECARS based on different window widths(a): Window width=3; (b): Window width=17; (c): Window width=31
    Fig. 2. Characteristic variables selected by MA-ECARS based on different window widths
    (a): Window width=3; (b): Window width=17; (c): Window width=31
    Characteristic variables selected by MF-ECARS based on different window widths(a): Window width=5; (b): Window width=15; (c): Window width=23
    Fig. 3. Characteristic variables selected by MF-ECARS based on different window widths
    (a): Window width=5; (b): Window width=15; (c): Window width=23
    Characteristic variables selected by GF-ECARS based on different window widths(a): Window width=5; (b): Window width=19; (c): Window width=31
    Fig. 4. Characteristic variables selected by GF-ECARS based on different window widths
    (a): Window width=5; (b): Window width=19; (c): Window width=31
    Characteristic wavelengths selected by SPA
    Fig. 5. Characteristic wavelengths selected by SPA
    Characteristic wavelengths selected by CARS
    Fig. 6. Characteristic wavelengths selected by CARS
    The prediction results of GF-ECARS-PLSR
    Fig. 7. The prediction results of GF-ECARS-PLSR
    预处理训练集预测集
    RMSECRc2RMSEPRp2
    Raw0.246 20.970 00.410 40.916 0
    MA Smoothing0.191 40.964 80.238 50.945 9
    GF Smoothing0.308 30.962 30.364 90.947 7
    MF Smoothing0.233 40.947 40.275 20.927 9
    SG Smoothing0.328 80.962 90.384 80.932 7
    De-trending0.412 80.951 90.509 50.927 8
    MSC0.453 80.967 40.588 50.945 8
    Table 1. The PLSR model result of different pretreatments
    窗口宽度光谱范围主因子数RMSEP
    90862.14~912.07100.288 3
    100861.58~917.04100.276 8
    110859.91~920.91100.270 8
    120854.34~920.91100.264 1
    130839.83~912.07100.255 9
    140833.68~911.53100.246 7
    150833.68~917.04100.237 2
    160833.68~922.57100.230 1
    170828.09~922.57100.227 3
    180816.89~917.04100.220 3
    190811.29~917.04100.214 8
    200810.16~921.46100.210 8
    210796.69~913.73100.204 2
    Table 2. Characteristic bands selected by moving window partial least squares (MWPLS)
    特征波长选择方法变量
    数目
    训练集预测集
    RMSECRc2RMESPRp2
    RAW1 0570.308 30.962 30.364 90.947 7
    SPA50.145 40.913 70.622 30.808 1
    CARS1200.181 90.983 50.321 20.9 470
    MWPLS2110.368 10.932 30.429 70.910 2
    MA-ECARS860.246 30.969 70.265 90.965 5
    MWS-ECARSMF-ECARS1420.242 30.970 60.267 70.964 4
    GF-ECARS960.232 20.973 10.251 70.969 2
    Table 3. The PLSR model of different selection methods of characteristic variables
    Li YUAN, Bin SHI, Jian-cheng YU, Tian-yu TANG, Yuan YUAN, Yan-lin TANG. Application of Different Smoothing Ensemble CARS Algorithm in Spectral Discrimination of Black Tea Grade[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(10): 3254
    Download Citation