Author Affiliations
School of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Experimental intermediate diagram
Fig. 2. Calculation process of saliency maps
Fig. 3. Three-dimensional color histograms of different regions. (a) Sea ice; (b) sea water; (c) crushed ice
Fig. 4. Saliency maps obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) GT; (c) DRFI; (d) RBD; (e) MR; (f) GS; (g) BSCA; (h) MAP; (i) SRD; (j) proposed algorithm
Fig. 5. Comparison of P-R curves of different algorithms
Fig. 6. Comparison of MAE values of different algorithms
Fig. 7. MAE in different datasets
Fig. 8. F_measure in different datasets
Fig. 9. Comparison of segmentation methods. (a) Original image; (b) GT; (c) proposed algorithm; (d) MACWE; (e) MRF; (f) MRF_BCD
Fig. 10. MIoU of each segmentation method
Parameter | Content |
---|
Center coordinate | (13°41'49.5″W, 80°53'27.6″N) | Greenwich mean time | 2015-09-03T16∶48∶28 | Resolution | 12.5 m | Angle of incidence | 27.06° | Image size | 2690×6002 |
|
Table 1. Information table of seascape images
Algorithm | RBD | MR | GS | DRFI | BSCA | MAP | SRD | Proposedalgorithm | DRFI+ | Proposedalgorithm+ |
---|
Time /s | 0.302 | 0.307 | 0.323 | 2.821 | 1.236 | 0.539 | 0.918 | 2.832 | 1.051 | 1.063 |
|
Table 2. Running time of different algorithms
Dataset | BSCA | MAP | SRD | DRFI | RBD | GS | MR | Proposed algorithm |
---|
a | 0.798 | 0.797 | 0.807 | 0.781 | 0.788 | 0.619 | 0.780 | 0.819 | b | 0.573 | 0.478 | 0.378 | 0.696 | 0.227 | 0.354 | 0.570 | 0.784 | c | 0.703 | 0.653 | 0.633 | 0.758 | 0.722 | 0.586 | 0.671 | 0.763 | d | 0.478 | 0.406 | 0.373 | 0.742 | 0.331 | 0.282 | 0.332 | 0.764 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of F_measure values of different algorithms