• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 10, 101011 (2020)
Huixian Yang, Xiaoxiao Li*, and Weifa Gan
Author Affiliations
  • Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering College, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.101011 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Huixian Yang, Xiaoxiao Li, Weifa Gan. A Face Recognition Algorithm Based on Adaptive Weighted Curvelet Gradient Direction Histogram[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(10): 101011 Copy Citation Text show less
    Fusion images at four scales. (a) Scale 1; (b) scale 2; (c) scale 3; (d) scale 4
    Fig. 1. Fusion images at four scales. (a) Scale 1; (b) scale 2; (c) scale 3; (d) scale 4
    Flow of AWCHOG algorithm
    Fig. 2. Flow of AWCHOG algorithm
    ORL face dataset. (a) Image 1; (b) image 2; (c) image 3; (d) image 4; (e) image 5; (f) image 6
    Fig. 3. ORL face dataset. (a) Image 1; (b) image 2; (c) image 3; (d) image 4; (e) image 5; (f) image 6
    AR face dataset. (a) Training sample; (b) facial express subset; (c) illumination subset; (d) partial occlusion subset A; (e) partial occlusion subset B
    Fig. 4. AR face dataset. (a) Training sample; (b) facial express subset; (c) illumination subset; (d) partial occlusion subset A; (e) partial occlusion subset B
    CAS-PEAL face dataset. (a) Training sample; (b) Express subset; (c) Background subset; (d) Accessory subset
    Fig. 5. CAS-PEAL face dataset. (a) Training sample; (b) Express subset; (c) Background subset; (d) Accessory subset
    Recognition rate of ORL face dataset at different gradient directions
    Fig. 6. Recognition rate of ORL face dataset at different gradient directions
    Recognition rate of ORL face dataset in different block modes. (a) Coarse floor; (b) detail 1 floor; (c) detail 2 floor; (d) fine floor
    Fig. 7. Recognition rate of ORL face dataset in different block modes. (a) Coarse floor; (b) detail 1 floor; (c) detail 2 floor; (d) fine floor
    Coefficient levelCoefficient matrix formDimension
    Coarse19×15 matrix285
    Detail 11×8 cell consisting of the matrix of size 17×31 or 37×154328
    Detail 21×16 cell consisting of the matrix of size 32×31 or 28×30 or 38×26 or 38×2314776
    Fine112×92 matrix10304
    Table 1. Form of Curvelet coefficients after Curvelet transform for 112 pixel×92 pixel face image
    ScaleRecognition rate /%
    ORLARCAS-PEAL
    190.0091.0098.14
    292.5092.3398.54
    393.0094.6798.89
    495.5095.6799.20
    589.5090.6795.94
    Table 2. Recognition rate of Curvelet transform at different scales
    AlgorithmRecognition rate /%
    Image 2Image 3Image 4Image 5Image 6
    Wavelet83.1388.2187.9293.7496.50
    HOG85.0089.2992.5097.0096.88
    Curvelet+PCA+SRC88.2193.3394.0095.0095.83
    Gabor+HOG90.4194.6197.2198.2098.69
    NSCT+LBP89.1494.7996.2098.1198.69
    AWNHOG82.2587.2191.2595.0096.88
    AWCHOG+CRC90.1286.7992.5096.5097.33
    AWCHOG+KNN90.7195.5096.8898.7599.27
    Table 3. Recognition rate on ORL database
    AlgorithmRecognition rate /%
    Expression subsetAccessory subsetBackground subset
    Wavelet96.4578.6178.89
    HOG99.2069.0093.00
    Curvelet+PCA+SRC97.3478.8980.83
    Gabor+HOG99.7387.2295.56
    NSCT+LBP99.3874.2592.75
    AWNHOG99.6380.5099.00
    AWCHOG+CRC99.3398.6795.00
    AWCHOG+KNN99.7597.5098.50
    Table 4. Recognition rate on CAS-PEAL database
    AlgorithmRecognition rate /%
    Facial expresssubsetIlluminationsubsetPartial occlusionsubset APartial occlusionsubset B
    Wavelet92.6780.5079.5062.00
    HOG91.3390.3369.0049.00
    Curvelet+PCA+SRC94.6785.5091.3373.67
    Gabor+HOG96.3397.5081.0076.50
    NSCT+LBP96.6798.3396.6776.00
    AWNHOG98.3399.6796.6782.67
    AWCHOG+CRC95.3396.6793.6780.33
    AWCHOG+KNN99.5098.8996.0090.00
    Table 5. Recognition rate on AR database
    MethodNormalized variance of Gaussion white noiseφ
    00.00010.00020.00030.0004
    Wavelet80.5039.0021.5016.6714.6781.78
    HOG90.3368.3358.6753.6752.3342.06
    Curvelet+PCA+SRC85.5071.6768.3367.6765.6723.19
    Gabor+HOG97.5086.0084.6781.0079.3318.63
    NSCT+LBP98.3391.5085.5074.0070.5028.30
    AWNHOG99.6793.6790.3383.6779.6720.06
    AWCHOG+KNN98.8998.0096.6791.6790.678.31
    Table 6. Results of different algorithms on AR illumination subset after adding Gaussian noise
    MethodFeaturedimensionalityT1 /msT2 /ms
    Wavelet192016.414.2
    HOG3204.538.1
    Curvelet+PCA+SRC285033.241.4
    Gabor+HOG9600163.398.9
    NSCT+LBP3696856.330.1
    AWNHOG204815.938.3
    AWCHOG+KNN227214.535.7
    Table 7. Dimensionality and time of different algorithms on ORL face dataset
    Huixian Yang, Xiaoxiao Li, Weifa Gan. A Face Recognition Algorithm Based on Adaptive Weighted Curvelet Gradient Direction Histogram[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(10): 101011
    Download Citation