• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 5, 051203 (2019)
Yong Zhang1、*, Hao Wu2, and Gang Niu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 32181 Unit of PLA, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China
  • 2 Department of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Army Engineering University Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 0 50003, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.051203 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yong Zhang, Hao Wu, Gang Niu. Consistency Detection Method for Large Spacing Axis Based on Non-Cooperative Target Image Processing Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(5): 051203 Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of finite distance image measurement method (D is finite). (a) Overall schematic; (b) section
    Fig. 1. Diagram of finite distance image measurement method (D is finite). (a) Overall schematic; (b) section
    Schematic of image measurement
    Fig. 2. Schematic of image measurement
    Calculation result by SIFT
    Fig. 3. Calculation result by SIFT
    Images acquired by optical sensors and center position of cross-section after registration of RANSAC. (a) Image acquired by O1; (b) image acquired by O2; (c) enlarged image by O2
    Fig. 4. Images acquired by optical sensors and center position of cross-section after registration of RANSAC. (a) Image acquired by O1; (b) image acquired by O2; (c) enlarged image by O2
    Appearance and diagram of eyepiece image acquiring device. (a) Appearance of the device; (b) device structure
    Fig. 5. Appearance and diagram of eyepiece image acquiring device. (a) Appearance of the device; (b) device structure
    Appearance and internal structure of mechanical connection plug. (a) Appearance; (b) device structure
    Fig. 6. Appearance and internal structure of mechanical connection plug. (a) Appearance; (b) device structure
    Experimental equipment
    Fig. 7. Experimental equipment
    Captured images when two optical axes are not parallel. (a) Images captured by O1; (b) images captured by O2; (c) center deviation of O1 and O2
    Fig. 8. Captured images when two optical axes are not parallel. (a) Images captured by O1; (b) images captured by O2; (c) center deviation of O1 and O2
    Error analysis result for axis distance measurement error of 10 mm and range error of 1 m
    Fig. 9. Error analysis result for axis distance measurement error of 10 mm and range error of 1 m
    Coordinate A'Coordinate BCoordinate CW /mLA'B /pixellA'B /mmMeasurement /(″)
    2247,15602249,15402277,201390020.10381.7818.74
    2131,14642133,14462159,187190018.11382.8118.98
    2135,14742136,14582159,183390016.03384.0319.26
    1727,15621766,15351799,217639047.43288.226.23
    1913,16311938,16121958,198439031.40328.7315.19
    2151,15932166,15732186,193939025.00265.9917.98
    2336,13852424,13472466,208022095.85287.2211.98
    2299,16632369,16192400,220322082.68311.0310.34
    2360,16532415,16142445,213122067.42286.4312.72
    1925,15041984,14812002,177414563.32312.7918.20
    1928,15261965,15121977,169714539.56309.4213.39
    Table 1. Results of axis deviation when two optical axes are parallel
    Coordinate A'Coordinate BCoordinate CW /mLA'B /pixellA'B /mmMeasurement /(″)Deviation /(″)
    1680,13181900,13151915,16779002205165.41183.8-35.2
    1913,14322024,14292031,16139001115127.41175.1-43.9
    1991,12582269,12492288,17049002785197.01191.1-27.9
    2008,14202131,14162138,16003901232306.61219.90.9
    1967,12652269,12382289,16913903032307.81220.61.6
    1902,11022365,10532394,17443904652325.51229.910.9
    1899,14252030,14192038,16042201311258.01179.5-39.5
    1774,13232029,13092043,16702202551255.21176.8-42.2
    1464,10931955,10691983,17622204921259.31180.7-38.3
    1878,14312024,14192032,1602145146859.61222.83.8
    1713,13301993,12972007,1661145282822.31169.7-49.3
    1338,11261895,10571918,1749145561875.41245.326.3
    Table 2. Axis deviation when two optical axes are not parallel
    Yong Zhang, Hao Wu, Gang Niu. Consistency Detection Method for Large Spacing Axis Based on Non-Cooperative Target Image Processing Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(5): 051203
    Download Citation