Author Affiliations
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China2National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Space and Optoelectronics Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China3School of Opto Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Space debris ranging and imaging composite system
Fig. 2. Principle diagram of the optical path of the space debris detection and ranging composite system
Fig. 3. Optical structure of telescope structure system
Fig. 4. System image quality evaluation
Fig. 5. Structure diagram of the main mirror assembly
Fig. 6. Flexible support
Fig. 7. RMS value analysis result of the surface error of the main mirror assembly
Fig. 8. First three modes of the primary mirror assembly
Fig. 9. Lightweight hole model of main mirror
Fig. 10. Model comparison under different lightweight shapes
Fig. 11. Surface inspection result of main mirror assembly
Fig. 12. Secondary mirror assembly structure
Fig. 13. Structure diagram of optical telescope
Fig. 14. Simulation results of the whole machine
Fig. 15. Simulation results of the tail installation of the whole machine
Fig. 16. Surface fitting results
Fig. 17. Testing site
Fig. 18. Test of the optical telescope surface shape error
Item | Technical index requirements | Effective aperture of optical system | 250 mm | Surface accuracy RMS of main mirror assembly | ≥λ/40
| System wave aberration RMS | ≥λ/10
| Primary and secondary mirror spacing error | ≤0.02 mm | Primary and secondary mirror tilt | ≤3″ | Secondary mirror and bracket blocking ratio | ≤7% | Optical antenna fundamental frequency | ≥120 Hz | Optical antenna quality | ≤10 kg |
|
Table 1. Technical specificatons optical telescope
Material | $\rho /{g}\cdot {\rm cm}^{-3}$![]() ![]() | $ E/\rho $![]() ![]() | Thermal stability | $ \mu $![]() ![]() | $ \mathrm{\alpha }/ $![]() ℃
| Zerodur | 2.53 | 3.58 | 32.8 | 0.23 | 0.05
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | Be | 1.85 | 15.6 | 19.12 | 0.26 | 11.3
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | RB-SIC | 3.5 | 10.6 | 60.7 | 0.29 | 2.6
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | Al | 2.68 | 2.55 | 7.1 | 0.33 | 23.6
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | ULE | 2.21 | 3.08 | 87.3 | 0.17 | 0.015
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | TC4 | 2.53 | 4.44 | 29.49 | 0.23 | 8.9
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | 4J32 | 8.1 | 17 | 46.33 | 0.26 | 0.3
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | 4J36 | 8.05 | 18 | 8.25 | 0.29 | 1.26
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | 2A12 | 2.9 | 27 | 7.1 | 0.33 | 23.6
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ | 60SiC/Al | 3.02 | 71 | 25.88 | 0.17 | 8.5
$ \times {10}^{-6} $ |
|
Table 2. Material properties of optical telescope
Structure type | Triangle | circle | Hexagon | Minimum thickness/mm | 8.9 | 9.2 | 9.5 |
|
Table 3. Minimum panel thickness required for different lightweight structures
Structure type | First-order mode | Second-order mode | Third-order mode | Quality/kg | Lightweight rate | Volume/mm3 | Surface area/mm2 | Triangle | 2290.3 | 2290.5 | 2976 | 2.492 | 40.62% | 9.95e+05 | 2.57e+05 | Circle | 2005.4 | 2010.2 | 2698 | 2.422 | 42.28% | 9.58e+05 | 2.15e+05 | Hexagon | 1870.4 | 1890.6 | 2501 | 2.401 | 42.72% | 9.54e+05 | 2.02e+05 |
|
Table 4. Lightweight analysis results of main mirror