Author Affiliations
1Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics and School of Physics, Wuhan, China2University of Connecticut, Department of Physics, Storrs, Connecticut, United States3Wuhan Institute of Technology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Optical Information and Pattern Recognition, Wuhan, China4Kansas State University, Department of Physics, Manhattan, Kansas, United Statesshow less
Fig. 1. Probing CM in with HHS. (a) Schematic layout of the multichannel HHG in molecule that involves the ground () and first excited states () of the molecular ion. In , there are four channels labeled as XX, AA, XA, and AX, respectively, contributing to HHG. Here the first and second letters label the ionic state after ionization and before recombination, respectively. (b), (c) Experimentally retrieved population amplitude () of the state (b) and the relative phase () between the wave functions of and states (c) for the parallel (0 deg, green squares) and perpendicular (90 deg, red circles) alignment of the molecule. The solid lines show the TDDFT results for comparison. Error bars in panels (b) and (c) represent the SDs of the reconstructions, which are estimated from the experimental errors of the HHG signals with the bootstrap method.
Fig. 2. Reconstruction of CM in for perpendicular alignment. (a) Snapshots of the reconstructed hole densities for the alignment angle of 90 deg. (b) Time-dependent hole densities along the molecular backbone obtained by integration over the direction. For clarity, the molecular backbone has been plotted on the top of panel (b). (c) Time-dependent COC position (dashed line with circles) retrieved from the hole densities in (b). Here the dashed-dotted line is a linear fitting of to evaluate the CM speed, and the green squares represent the SD of the coordinate. (d) Flux of charge density crossing the plane. Negative value means CM from side to side.
Fig. 3. Reconstruction of CM in for parallel alignment. (a)–(d) The same as Fig. 2(a)–2(d), but for the case of parallel alignment of the molecule.
Fig. 4. TDDFT simulations of the CM dynamics in . (a), (b) TDDFT calculations of the reduced hole density and COC position in the experimental temporal range for the 90 deg alignment of the molecule. (c), (d) Same as panels (a) and (b), but for the parallel alignment (the alignment angle of 0 deg) of the molecule.
Fig. 5. Reconstruction of the CM speed in . Dashed line with squares shows the CM speed retrieved as a function of the alignment angles. The solid line plots the TDDFT result for comparison.