
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 10, Issue 2, 509 (2022)
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
The nonlinear optical frequency conversion process based on second-order nonlinearity can generate coherent radiations with new frequencies at octave separation with the pump, where efficient optical frequency downconversion can be achieved in an optical parametric oscillator (OPO) [1–15]. Such OPOs are of special importance to fulfill a specific wavelength requirement that is difficult for direct laser generation, for example, the mid-infrared (MIR) [16,17]. It also offers wide tunability by tailoring the phase-matching conditions, which is another important feature for spectroscopy applications [18,19]. Compared to the normal OPOs using bulk optics, mini-OPOs have been developed in a more compact and robust platform using monolithic optical resonators [20–23]. Such mini-OPOs have been demonstrated using lithium niobate (LN), which is known for its high nonlinear optical coefficient in
In this work, we demonstrate an OFC generation at 2 μm from a
2. OPTICAL SUPERLATTICE BOX RESONATOR
A perfect electromagnetic resonator can be formed by a rectangular boundary over a dielectric medium, and such a box resonator is a popular model in textbooks [34]. For the optical wave, we use this old concept to realize a new structure of a high-
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
Figure 1.Schematic and characterization of an optical superlattice box resonator. (a) Structure of the OSBR. The optical superlattice “box” is sandwiched by lithium tantalate (LT) substrates, with an effective size of
The fabrication process is shown in Fig. 1(b). It starts from the optical superlattice fabrication over a 76.2-mm-diameter MgO-doped LN wafer with our whole wafer poling technique. Then this wafer is polished down to a thickness of 76 μm with subnanometer surface roughness and coated with 110 nm
The poling period of the OSBR is 31.8 μm for the QPM optical parametric downconversion process from 1048 to 2096 nm. This process is chosen for comb generated at small anomalous dispersion wavelength of the resonator. To characterize the dispersion and
3. 2
In experiment, the pump light is from an ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier (YDFA), which is seeded by a CW tunable laser (Toptica CTL 1050). As shown in Fig. 2(a), a small portion of the pump is reflected by a 4% beam splitter for frequency and power stabilization. A wavelength meter (HighFinesse WS-U) is used to stabilize the frequency of seed laser, and a long-term stability within 1.5 MHz at around 1048 nm is achieved. The intensity noise from the YDFA is suppressed using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) feedback loop to reduce the absorption-induced thermal fluctuation on the resonances of the OSBR. The pump beam is then directed through a set of cylindrical lenses to match the mode profile of the resonator. The OSBR is placed in a doubly enclosed metal mount, where the mount and internal enclosure are thermally stabilized using a Peltier cooler, with the isolation from the external enclosure. Submillikelvin temperature stability can be achieved by high-performance temperature controllers. A pump-rejection filter is used after the resonator to separate the residue pump light from the output.
Figure 2.Experimental setup and output power tuning measurement of OSBR. (a) Experimental setup for 2 μm OFC generation. TSL, tunable semiconductor laser; YDFA, ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier; CLs, cylindrical lenses; PD, photodetector; BS, beam splitter; PBS, polarization beam splitter; ESA, electronic spectrum analyzer. (b) The output power of the 2 μm OFC as a function of the pump power. The measured maximum output power exceeds 0.34 W with an OPO threshold of 80 mW and a maximum conversion efficiency of 12.4%.
For our OSBR-based doubly resonant OPO, the pump intensity required to reach the oscillation threshold can be expressed as [38]
We couple the 2 μm output into a single-mode fiber for further spectral and temporal studies. By increasing the pump power over 300 mW and slightly changing the pump detuning, a comb-like spectrum can be captured with an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Yokogawa AQ6375). At pump power of 6 W, a comb span of about 40 nm around 2096 nm can be observed [upper panel of Fig. 3(a)]. The discrepancy between simulated and experimental results may arise from the imperfect degenerate parametric downconversion due to the fluctuation of OSBR temperature or pump laser wavelength. By slightly changing the pump detuning toward the blue side, two peaks appear in the comb spectrum, and the separation between these two peaks continues to increase with the detuning [Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. Due to the limited spectral resolution of the OSA, which is larger than the comb line spacing, only the comb envelope can be resolved. The abovementioned comb spectral measurement can be simulated with good agreement in both comb spans and envelope profiles. The gray curves in Figs. 3(a)–3(c) are simulated with
Figure 3.Study of optical and RF spectra of the 2 μm OFC. (a), (b), (c) The optical spectra of the OFC. The red curves show the measured comb spectra with different pump frequency detuning around 1048 nm and pump power of 6 W. The gray curves show the simulated spectra at stable comb states with 6 W pump power and at
The coherence of the 2 μm OFC is characterized with radio frequency (RF) measurements. A fast InGaAs detector (EOT ET-5000A) with RF bandwidth of 20 kHz to 10 GHz is used to detect the photon current generated by the whole comb output. The RF spectrum is measured by an electronic spectrum analyzer (ESA, R&S FSVA30), with results shown in Fig. 3(e). At proper pump detuning, clean beat note peaks can be captured at integer number times of the repetition frequency at 1.426 GHz, which is close to the cavity FSR of the 48.4 mm long box resonator. Figure 3(f) shows a zoom-in of the RF spectrum around the repetition frequency, with low noise level and a narrow
We also study the temporal behavior of the OFC using a fast oscilloscope (Tektronix MSO71604C) with 16 GHz bandwidth. As shown in Fig. 4(a) and zoomed-in in 4(b), the temporal waveforms can be observed with good repeatability. We plot the traces of 285 round trips stacked together in one round-trip time window of about 0.701 ns. As shown in Fig. 4(c), they match well with each other, with a standard deviation of less than 1.1%. They also match the time-domain simulation, with 6 W pump power and
Figure 4.Study of temporal waveforms and evolution of the 2 μm
4. NUMERICAL MODELING
Numerical modeling is studied in comparison to the experimental results. The simulation model we use is based on the solution of coupled wave equations as shown below, which is generally used for OPO studies and is also capable of the
The subscripts
The boundary conditions can be described as follows:
We use the split-step Fourier and fourth-order Runge–Kutta methods [42] to simplify Eq. (2), where the OPO process is split into small alternating steps in two types, with nonlinear interaction and linear propagation, respectively. In this simplification, the linear step is calculated in the frequency domain, while the nonlinear step is calculated in the time domain, and the Fourier transform is performed between such two types of steps for continuous simulation.
Taking the signal field as example, in the linear propagation step
The three-wave coupling in Eq. (2) is simulated in the nonlinear interaction step, which is denoted by the nonlinear operator
Thus, the field evolution after every step size
The pump and idler fields can be derived in a similar way.
Here, in our 48.4 mm long OSBR, we have a maximum bandwidth on the order of 10 THz for the parametric lights. Considering the bandwidth of the generated comb and the computer processing speed, sub-100-fs temporal resolution is used in the simulation.
For the signal and idler light fields, we consider the OSBR’s front facet to be totally reflective and the rear facet to be with a reflectivity of 98.5 % (corresponding to the measured quality factor of
We find that the buildup for the OPO process requires about 8000 round trips in the 48.4 mm long OSBR before reaching a steady state. So comb characterization is performed after this build-up time in all the simulations. Here we study the comb coherence at different pump frequency detunings and pump powers. The comb coherence is characterized by the temporal deviation function
Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show the temporal deviation of amplitude and phase, respectively, as a function of pump frequency detuning and pump power. The temporal deviation is calculated from the cross correlation between the 1400 round trips of successive temporal waveforms after 8600-round-trip evolution for reaching a steady state. We sweep the pump power from 0.25 W to 10 W and detuning from
Figure 5.Numerical modeling of comb generation in OSBR. (a), (b) Maps of simulated temporal deviation of (a) amplitude and (b) phase at different pump power and frequency detuning. (c) Simulated comb spectra at different pump wavelengths. The degenerate wavelength and corresponding GVD are marked in each case. The broadest comb span can be achieved around zero-dispersion wavelength of OSBR.
We also study the effect of dispersion on comb generation in the OSBR. The comb spectra are shown in Fig. 5(c), under different pump wavelengths from 600 to 1200 nm with a fixed detuning of 0 MHz and pump power of 6 W. The corresponding group velocity dispersion (GVD) varies at the central wavelength of the comb as the pump wavelength changes. The dispersion changes results in a change in the comb span, and the broadest comb span can be achieved around the zero-dispersion wavelength of the OSBR.
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we develop a new type of mini-OPO called OSBR and utilize it for
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. The authors acknowledge Prof. Xiaoshun Jiang, Ming Nie, and Bowen Li for fruitful discussions and suggestions regarding the manuscript.
References
[1] J. A. Giordmaine, R. C. Miller. Tunable coherent parametric oscillation in LiNbO3 at optical frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett., 14, 973-976(1965).
[2] S. E. Harris. Tunable optical parametric oscillators. Proc. IEEE, 57, 2096-2113(1969).
[3] S. Brosnan, R. Byer. Optical parametric oscillator threshold and linewidth studies. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 15, 415-431(1979).
[4] W. R. Bosenberg, A. Drobshoff, J. I. Alexander, L. E. Myers, R. L. Byer. 93% pump depletion, 3.5 W continuous-wave, singly resonant optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett., 21, 1336-1338(1996).
[5] B. Hardy, A. Berrou, S. Guilbaud, M. Raybaut, A. Godard, M. Lefebvre. Compact, single-frequency, doubly resonant optical parametric oscillator pumped in an achromatic phase-adapted double-pass geometry. Opt. Lett., 36, 678-680(2011).
[6] B. Scherrer, I. Ribet, A. Godard, E. Rosencher, M. Lefebvre. Dual-cavity doubly resonant optical parametric oscillators: demonstration of pulsed single-mode operation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 17, 1716-1729(2000).
[7] M. Lazoul, A. Boudrioua, S. L. Simohamed, A. Fischer, L. H. Peng. Experimental study of multiwavelength parametric generation in a two-dimensional periodically poled lithium tantalate crystal. Opt. Lett., 38, 3892-3894(2013).
[8] M. Lazoul, A. Boudrioua, L.-M. Simohamed, L.-H. Peng. Multi-resonant optical parametric oscillator based on 2D-PPLT nonlinear photonic crystal. Opt. Lett., 40, 1861-1864(2015).
[9] N. E. Yu, S. Kurimura, Y. Nomura, M. Nakamura, K. Kitamura. Efficient optical parametric oscillation based on periodically poled 1.0 mol% MgO-doped stoichiometric LiTaO3. Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 5134-5136(2004).
[10] N. E. Yu, S. Kurimura, Y. Nomura, M. Nakamura, K. Kitamura, J. Sakuma, Y. Otani, A. Shiratori. Periodically poled near-stoichiometric lithium tantalate for optical parametric oscillation. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 1662-1664(2004).
[11] C. R. Phillips, J. S. Pelc, M. M. Fejer. Continuous wave monolithic quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillator in periodically poled lithium niobate. Opt. Lett., 36, 2973-2975(2011).
[12] C. Langrock, M. M. Fejer. Fiber-feedback continuous-wave and synchronously-pumped singly-resonant ring optical parametric oscillators using reverse-proton-exchanged periodically-poled lithium niobate waveguides. Opt. Lett., 32, 2263-2265(2007).
[13] G. Schreiber, D. Hofmann, W. Grundkotter, Y. L. Lee, H. Suche, V. Quiring, R. Ricken, W. Sohler. Nonlinear integrated optical frequency conversion in periodically poled Ti:LiNbO3 waveguides. Proc. SPIE, 4277, 144-160(2001).
[14] S.-Y. Tu, A. H. Kung, Z. D. Gao, S. N. Zhu. Efficient periodically poled stoichiometric lithium tantalate optical parametric oscillator for the visible to near-infrared region. Opt. Lett., 30, 2451-2453(2005).
[15] Z. D. Xie, X. J. Lv, Y. H. Liu, W. Ling, Z. L. Wang, Y. X. Fan, S. N. Zhu. Cavity phase matching via an optical parametric oscillator consisting of a dielectric nonlinear crystal sheet. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 083901(2011).
[16] M. M. J. W. van Herpen, S. T. L. Hekkert, S. E. Bisson, F. J. M. Harren. Wide single-mode tuning of a 3.0–3.8 μm, 700 mW, continuous-wave Nd:YAG-pumped optical parametric oscillator based on periodically poled lithium niobate. Opt. Lett., 27, 640-642(2002).
[17] P. Gross, M. E. Klein, T. Walde, K. J. Boller, M. Auerbach, P. Wessels, C. Fallnich. Fiber-laser-pumped continuous-wave singly resonant optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett., 27, 418-420(2002).
[18] M. E. Klein, P. Gross, K. J. Boller, M. Auerbach, P. Wessels, C. Fallnich. Rapidly tunable continuous wave optical parametric oscillator pumped by a fiber laser. Opt. Lett., 28, 920-922(2003).
[19] I. Lindsay, B. Adhimoolam, P. Gross, M. Klein, K.-J. Boller. 110 GHz rapid, continuous tuning from an optical parametric oscillator pumped by a fiber-amplified DBR diode laser. Opt. Express, 13, 1234-1239(2005).
[20] C. S. Werner, K. Buse, I. Breunig. Continuous-wave whispering gallery optical parametric oscillator for high-resolution spectroscopy. Opt. Lett., 40, 772-775(2015).
[21] A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, J. B. Surya, C.-L. Zou, H. X. Tang. On-chip χ(2) microring optical parametric oscillator. Optica, 6, 1361-1366(2019).
[22] J. U. Furst, D. V. Strekalov, D. Elser, A. Aiello, U. L. Andersen, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs. Low-threshold optical parametric oscillations in a whispering gallery mode resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 263904(2010).
[23] Q. Mo, S. Li, Y. Liu, X. Jiang, G. Zhao, Z. Xie, X. Lv, S. Zhu. Widely tunable optical parametric oscillator in periodically poled congruently grown lithium tantalite whispering gallery mode resonators. Chin. Opt. Lett., 14, 091902(2016).
[24] S. N. Zhu, Y. Y. Zhu, N. B. Ming. Quasi-phase-matched third-harmonic generation in a quasi-periodic optical superlattice. Science, 278, 843-846(1997).
[25] Y. W. Lee, F. C. Fan, Y. C. Huang, B. Y. Gu, B. Z. Dong, M. H. Chou. Nonlinear multiwavelength conversion based on an aperiodic optical superlattice in lithium niobate. Opt. Lett., 27, 2191-2193(2002).
[26] T. Beckmann, H. Linnenbank, H. Steigerwald, B. Sturman, D. Haertle, K. Buse, I. Breunig. Highly tunable low-threshold optical parametric oscillation in radially poled whispering gallery resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 143903(2011).
[27] T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch. Optical frequency metrology. Nature, 416, 233-237(2002).
[28] S. T. Cundiff, J. Ye. Colloquium: femtosecond optical frequency combs. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 325-342(2003).
[29] P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, T. J. Kippenberg. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature, 450, 1214-1217(2007).
[30] T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, S. A. Diddams. Microresonator-based optical frequency combs. Science, 332, 555-559(2011).
[31] V. Ulvila, C. Phillips, L. Halonen, M. Vainio. Frequency comb generation by a continuous-wave-pumped optical parametric oscillator based on cascading quadratic nonlinearities. Opt. Lett., 38, 4281-4284(2013).
[32] V. Ulvila, C. Phillips, L. Halonen, M. Vainio. High-power mid-infrared frequency comb from a continuous-wave-pumped bulk optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Express, 22, 10535-10543(2014).
[33] A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, Z. Gong, J. B. Surya, M. Li, C. L. Zou, H. X. Tang. Pockels soliton microcomb. Nat. Photonics, 15, 21-27(2021).
[34] B. M. Notaroš. Conceptual Electromagnetics(2017).
[35] S. M. Spillance, T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala. Ultralow-threshold Raman laser using a spherical dielectric microcavity. Nature, 415, 621-623(2002).
[36] D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, K. J. Vahala. Ultra-high-
[37] V. S. Ilchenko, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, L. Maleki. Nonlinear optics and crystalline whispering gallery mode cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 043903(2004).
[38] M. Ebrahimzadeh, M. H. Dunn. Optical Parametric Oscillators in Handbook of Optics(2001).
[39] S. Mosca, M. Parisi, I. Ricciardi, F. Leo, T. Hansson, M. Erkintalo, P. Maddaloni, P. De Natale, S. Wabnitz, M. De Rosa. Modulation instability induced frequency comb generation in a continuously pumped optical parametric oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 093903(2018).
[40] M. Stefszky, V. Ulvila, Z. Abdallah, C. Silberhorn, M. Vainio. Towards optical-frequency-comb generation in continuous-wave-pumped titanium-indiffused lithium-niobate waveguide resonators. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 053850(2018).
[41] O. Gayer, Z. Sacks, E. Galun, A. Arie. Temperature and wavelength dependent refractive index equations for MgO-doped congruent and stoichiometric LiNbO3. Appl. Phys. B, 91, 343-348(2008).
[42] A. V. Smith, R. J. Gehr, M. S. Bowers. Numerical models of broad-bandwidth nanosecond optical parametric oscillators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 16, 609-619(1999).
[43] T. Hansson, P. Parra-Rivas, M. Bernard, F. Leo, L. Gelens, S. Wabnitz. Quadratic soliton combs in doubly resonant second-harmonic generation. Opt. Lett., 43, 6033-6036(2018).
[44] M. Nie, S.-W. Huang. Quadratic soliton mode-locked degenerate optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett., 45, 2311-2314(2020).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address