• Journal of Inorganic Materials
  • Vol. 36, Issue 8, 871 (2021)
Luping WANG1, Zhanhui LU1、*, Xin WEI2, Ming FANG3, and Xiangke WANG3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 11. School of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • 22. College of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • 33. MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.15541/jim20200661 Cite this Article
    Luping WANG, Zhanhui LU, Xin WEI, Ming FANG, Xiangke WANG. Application of Improved Grey Model in Photocatalytic Data Prediction[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(8): 871 Copy Citation Text show less
    Modelling steps of EDGM(1, 1, α)
    1. Modelling steps of EDGM(1, 1, α)
    XRD pattern of Bi/BiOCl/Au
    2. XRD pattern of Bi/BiOCl/Au
    Simulating results of tetracycline concentration from (a) DGM(1, 1), (b) DGM(1, 1, α), (c) EDGM(1, 1), and (d) EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    3. Simulating results of tetracycline concentration from (a) DGM(1, 1), (b) DGM(1, 1, α), (c) EDGM(1, 1), and (d) EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    Simulated epsilon of tetracycline concentration from DGM(1, 1), DGM(1, 1, α), EDGM(1, 1), and EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    4. Simulated epsilon of tetracycline concentration from DGM(1, 1), DGM(1, 1, α), EDGM(1, 1), and EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    Time/min0153045607590105120135
    Con./(mg·L-1) 38.6634.5231.3929.1027.0025.1523.1621.2419.4018.29
    Table 1. Experimental data of tetracycline concentration
    Date sizeExperimental data/(mg·L-1) Forecast data /(mg·L-1) MRE
    427.0025.1526.9324.890.005
    525.1523.1625.1323.420.006
    623.1621.2423.5021.980.025
    721.2419.4021.4619.840.017
    819.4018.2919.5617.970.025
    Table 2. Different data size forecast comparison
    Time /min Con. /(mg·L-1) DGM (1, 1) DGM (1, 1, α) EDGM (1, 1) EDGM (1, 1, α)
    6027.0026.6026.9326.6026.93
    7525.1524.4125.0724.5724.89
    9023.1622.4023.4122.5222.98
    10521.2420.5521.9220.7521.20
    12019.4018.8620.5619.0519.56
    13518.2917.3119.3217.5418.03
    Table 3. Predicted values of DGM(1, 1), DGM(1, 1, α), EDGM(1, 1), and EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    ModelMREFD
    DGM(1, 1)0.0320.984
    DGM(1, 1, α) 0.0280.985
    EDGM(1, 1)0.0250.988
    EDGM(1, 1, α) 0.0080.995
    Table 4. The MRE and FD of DGM(1, 1), DGM(1, 1, α), EDGM(1, 1), and EDGM(1, 1, α) models
    Luping WANG, Zhanhui LU, Xin WEI, Ming FANG, Xiangke WANG. Application of Improved Grey Model in Photocatalytic Data Prediction[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(8): 871
    Download Citation