• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 11, 1112002 (2022)
Xudong Wang, Aihua Gao*, Lirong Yan, Wengang Qin, and Wenjin Li
Author Affiliations
  • School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, Shaanxi , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1112002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xudong Wang, Aihua Gao, Lirong Yan, Wengang Qin, Wenjin Li. Influence of Light Sources of Different Wavelengths on Scattering Rate of Defects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(11): 1112002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of integrated scattering detection
    Fig. 1. Schematic of integrated scattering detection
    Spectral response curves of photomultiplier tube
    Fig. 2. Spectral response curves of photomultiplier tube
    Comparison of sample scattering rate in two working modes
    Fig. 3. Comparison of sample scattering rate in two working modes
    Comparison of sample scattering rate in two working modes
    Fig. 4. Comparison of sample scattering rate in two working modes
    Parameter typeValue
    Anode sensitivity /(V·nW-115
    Cathode sensitivity /(mA·W-178
    Current gain M105
    Table 1. Partial characteristic parameter table of photomultiplier tube
    λ /nmReferencevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6353.76003.76203.75903.7603
    5252.92102.92002.91802.9197
    4050.37150.37200.37180.3718
    Table 2. Reference voltage values corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (80 mW)
    λ /nmReferencevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6352.57002.56902.57102.5700
    5251.97801.97701.97901.9780
    4050.25590.25600.25610.2560
    Table 3. Reference voltage values corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (50 mW)
    λ /nmSamplevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6353.75553.75603.75583.7558
    5253.03503.03603.03403.0350
    4050.45100.45130.45080.4510
    Table 4. Voltage values of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (80 mW)
    λ /nmSamplevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6352.56002.55902.56102.5600
    5252.02102.02202.02002.0210
    4050.30600.30610.30590.3060
    Table 5. Voltage values of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (50 mW)
    λ /nmScattering rate
    6350.009988
    5250.010395
    4050.012130
    Table 6. Scattering rate data of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (80 mW)
    λ /nmScattering rate
    6350.009961
    5250.010217
    4050.011953
    Table 7. Scattering rate data of the sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (50 mW)
    λ /nmSamplevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6354.43004.42954.42974.4297
    5253.69203.69173.69223.6920
    4050.57800.57780.57820.5780
    Table 8. Voltage value of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (80 mW)
    λ /nmScattering rate
    6350.011780
    5250.012645
    4050.015546
    Table 9. Scattering rate data of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (80 mW)
    λ /nmSamplevoltagevalue /VAverage voltage value /V
    6352.98702.98682.98712.9870
    5252.43402.43392.43382.4339
    4050.36800.36770.36810.3679
    Table 10. Voltage value of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (50 mW)
    λ /nmScattering rate
    6350.011623
    5250.012305
    4050.014371
    Table 11. Scattering rate data of sample to be tested corresponding to light sources of different wavelengths (50 mW)
    Xudong Wang, Aihua Gao, Lirong Yan, Wengang Qin, Wenjin Li. Influence of Light Sources of Different Wavelengths on Scattering Rate of Defects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(11): 1112002
    Download Citation