Author Affiliations
College of Control Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Diagram of telemetry device
Fig. 2. Optical power (DC) signal and spectrum (2f) signal of detection device
Fig. 3. Laser beam divergence angle under different driving currents. (a) In W direction; (b) in V direction
Fig. 4. Changes in the received optical power
Fig. 5. Variation of spot center position. (a) At 44 cm; (b) at 167 cm
Fig. 6. Zoom lens in ZEMAX simulation. (a) Structure of zoom lens; (b) deformation model of zoom lens surface affected by gravity
Fig. 7. Concentration calibration. (a) 2f spectra of methane at different concentrations; (b) relationship between peak-peak value of 2f signal and integral concentration
Fig. 8. Stability test. (a) CH4 concentration reading; (b) Allan variance curve
Fig. 9. Telemetry device and results. (a) Test for methane leaking in corridor; (b) optical devices of telemetry device; (c) test spectrum for methane concentration of 4.95×10-6
Test distance /m | Concentration ofsample /% | Optimal drivingcurrent /mA | Increased timesof receiving optical power | Improvementtimes of SNR |
---|
| 0.1 | 25 | 1.7 | 1.69 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 25 | 3.6 | 1.24 | | 1.0 | 10 | 2.4 | 1.10 | | 0.1 | 85--89 | 2.8 | 1.28 | 50 | 0.5 | 86--89 | 2.0 | 1.36 | | 1.0 | 91--95 | 2.0 | 1.09 |
|
Table 1. Improvement effect of electronically controlled zoom lens on receiving optical power
Current /mA | Focallength /cm | Measuredangle /(°) | Spherical model | Aspherical model |
---|
Simulationangle /(°) | Error /(°) | Simulationangle /(°) | Error /(°) |
---|
85 | 374.5 | 0.01369 | 0.01300 | -0.00069 | 0.01357 | -0.00012 | 92 | 220.8 | -0.00835 | -0.00738 | 0.00097 | -0.00842 | -0.00007 | 95 | 187.6 | -0.02282 | -0.02572 | -0.00290 | -0.02297 | -0.00015 |
|
Table 2. Measured and simulated values of deflection angle for different focal lengths of different models
Test No. | Test distance /m | Integral concentration /10-6 | Average concentration /10-6 |
---|
1 | 100.0 | 740.0 | 7.40 | 2 | 104.4 | 516.9 | 4.95 |
|
Table 3. Field test results