• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 12, 1210027 (2021)
Xiucai Guo and Haoran Cong*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electrical & Control Engineering, Xi'an University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1210027 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiucai Guo, Haoran Cong. Face Recognition Based on Wavelet Transform and Multifeature Fusion Coding[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210027 Copy Citation Text show less
    Segmentation schematic of AR-LGC operator
    Fig. 1. Segmentation schematic of AR-LGC operator
    Coding process for improved asymmetric LGC
    Fig. 2. Coding process for improved asymmetric LGC
    Schematic of image fusion coding
    Fig. 3. Schematic of image fusion coding
    Extraction effects of various algorithms before and after adding Gabor wavelet. (a) Raw face image; (b) LBP operator before adding Gabor wavelet; (c) AR-LGC operator before adding Gabor wavelet; (d) multi-feature fusion coding before adding Gabor wavelet; (e) LBP operator after adding Gabor wavelet; (f) AR-LGC operator after adding Gabor wavelet; (g) proposed method
    Fig. 4. Extraction effects of various algorithms before and after adding Gabor wavelet. (a) Raw face image; (b) LBP operator before adding Gabor wavelet; (c) AR-LGC operator before adding Gabor wavelet; (d) multi-feature fusion coding before adding Gabor wavelet; (e) LBP operator after adding Gabor wavelet; (f) AR-LGC operator after adding Gabor wavelet; (g) proposed method
    Flow chart of face recognition
    Fig. 5. Flow chart of face recognition
    Recognition rate curve under different number of blocks
    Fig. 6. Recognition rate curve under different number of blocks
    Treatment effect and process of proposed method
    Fig. 7. Treatment effect and process of proposed method
    Part of images from different face databases. (a) Yale face database; (b) ORL face database
    Fig. 8. Part of images from different face databases. (a) Yale face database; (b) ORL face database
    Part of images from different face databases. (a) FERET face database; (b) CMU-PIE face database
    Fig. 9. Part of images from different face databases. (a) FERET face database; (b) CMU-PIE face database
    Number of blocksFeature dimensionAverage recognition rate /%
    2×264085.88
    3×3144088.80
    4×4256090.28
    5×5400095.03
    9×91296092.70
    11×111936089.30
    16×164096088.82
    Table 1. Feature dimension and average recognition rate under different number of blocks
    MethodRecognition rate
    N=4N=5N=6N=7N=8
    PCA[10]76.479.387.691.593.2
    Gabor[10]84.190.092.092.394.1
    HOG informationentropy weighting[26]85.389.193.194.597.8
    Ref. [27]92.092.293.594.896.3
    LBP operator84.588.993.894.594.9
    AR-LGC operator85.092.894.695.095.1
    Proposed method85.593.296.097.297.9
    Table 2. Recognition rate of each algorithm in YALE face database unit: %
    MethodRecognition rate
    N=4N=5N=6N=7N=8
    PCA[10]77.381.491.592.793.5
    Gabor[10]84.589.191.793.194.0
    HOG information entropy weighting[26]87.892.094.396.498.3
    Ref. [27]89.090.594.596.096.5
    LBP operator84.990.593.495.195.8
    AR-LGC operator85.292.694.595.896.0
    Proposed method85.493.996.197.698.5
    Table 3. Recognition rate of each algorithm in ORL face database unit: %
    MethodRecognition rate
    bebjbf
    LBP operator65.868.165.5
    AR-LGC operator83.989.581.6
    Proposed method89.493.887.7
    Table 4. Recognition rate of each algorithm in FERET face database unit: %
    MethodRecognition rate
    N=10N=20N=30N=40N=50
    LBP operator[25]69.172.680.482.885.5
    AR-LGC operator71.075.285.186.088.4
    Ref. [28]73.883.486.2----
    Ref. [25]74.884.787.6----
    Ref. [29]78.687.090.090.290.3
    Proposed method75.880.690.291.394.6
    Table 5. Recognition rate of each algorithm in CMU-PIE face database unit: %
    MethodAverage recognition time
    LBP operator[25]22.36
    AR-LGC operator24.15
    Ref. [28]26.77
    Ref. [25]17.56
    Ref. [29]25.31
    Proposed method26.98
    Table 6. Average recognition time of each algorithm in CMU-PIE face database unit: ms
    Xiucai Guo, Haoran Cong. Face Recognition Based on Wavelet Transform and Multifeature Fusion Coding[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210027
    Download Citation