• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 44, Issue 1, 010202 (2023)
Zheng Tang1、* and Liming Ding2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, Center for Advanced Low-dimension Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • 2Center for Excellence in Nanoscience (CAS), Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication (CAS), National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/010202 Cite this Article
    Zheng Tang, Liming Ding. The voltage loss in organic solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(1): 010202 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The power conversion efficiency (PCE) for donor–acceptor bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs) has reached ~20%[13], approaching that for inorganic solar cells, due to the development of key photoactive materials[414]. The short-circuit current density (Jsc) and the fill factor (FF) for state-of-the-art OSCs are already close to the thermodynamic upper limit predicted by Shockley-Queisser theory[15], but the open-circuit voltage (Voc) is low, limiting the overall performance of OSCs.

    LowVoc can be ascribed to the high radiative (Vr) and non-radiative (Vnr) voltage losses associated with the decay of photogenerated charge carriers[16]. Thus, understanding the mechanism of charge carrier decay dynamics in OSCs is the focus for device physicists. In 2009, Vandewalet al. analyzed the energetics of excited states in polymer-fullerene solar cells and revealed that the decay of charge carriers in OSCs occurredvia the charge transfer (CT) states formed at the polymer-fullerene interface[17]. Therefore, the high voltage loss was associated with the undesired electronic properties of CT state. Later, Vandewalet al. demonstrated that the key parameters determining the voltage loss included the energy of CT state (Ect), the reorganization energy (λ) of organic photovoltaic materials, and the absorption oscillator strength (fosc) of CT state[18].

    Owing to the existence of CT states with energy lower than the singlet (S1) state of the pristine photovoltaic materials, the absorption tail of OSCs extends into the long wavelength region. This leads to a very high saturation current[19], yielding highVr. Reducing the energy difference between the CT state and the S1 state (ΔEct) is an effective approach to reduceVr[19]. However, the reduced ΔEct often led to reduced exciton dissociation rate and limited device quantum efficiency[20]. Reducing the density of CT state (Nctc) can also effectively reduceVr[21]. The reducedNctc resulted in deteriorated transport properties of charge carriers, thus limiting FF. HighVr was believed to be an intrinsic problem for OSCs[22].

    In non-fullerene solar cells, high quantum efficiency could be obtained by using donor–acceptor blends with very low ΔEct or lowNctc[23]. Therefore, negligibleVr could be realized, and the major limit forVoc isVnr, which is associated with low external quantum efficiency of electroluminescence (EQEEL) for CT state[24], since

    Vnr=kTqln(1EQEEL),

    wherek is Boltzmann constant,q is elementary charge, andT is temperature. EQEEL is determined by following formula[25]:

    EQEEL=krkr+knr,

    wherekr andknr are the radiative and non-radiative decay rate constant, respectively. Thus, very highknr for CT state in organic blends leads to low EQEEL. Low EQEEL (<1 × 10–5) for organic solar cells yields highVnr (>0.3 V)[26]. Accordingly, more efforts have been spent on the manipulation of the decay dynamics of CT state in recent years to reduceknr and increase EQEEL. In 2017, Bunduhnet al. discovered that highknr of OSCs originated from strong vibrational coupling between CT state and the ground state[27]. The strong coupling resulted from high-frequency carbon vibration of organic molecules. Later, Ullbrichet al. reported that increasingEct could reduce vibrational coupling and reduceknr[28].Vnr was very low in OSCs with highEct. However, the use of high-bandgap material for highEct led to reduced spectral coverage of the solar cell, and thus reducingJsc and limiting overall device performance. Increasing the spacing between donor and acceptor molecules could also reduceknr and reduceVnr, thus improving overall device performance[29]. Furthermore, Azzouziet al. extended the model describing non-radiative decay rate of CT state[30], and demonstrated that reducingλ andfosc, or increasing static dipole moment of CT state, could reduceknr.

    Qianet al. indicated that increasing the degree of hybridization between CT state and S1 state could effectively increase EQEEL[31]. The increase in EQEEL was ascribed to the intensity-borrowing mechanism of the excited states. Later, Eisneret al. built a model to describe the impact of hybridization on the dynamic process of excited states[32]. They found thatVnr could be reduced, while increasingVr. It is still unclear whether the hybridization could improve overall device performance.

    Based on the improved understanding onVoc loss mechanism, many strategies, such as ternary strategy[33], mixed-solvent strategy[23], and thin-film deposition strategy[34], as well as material design strategies (e.g. side-chain engineering[35], double-cable structure[36]) have been developed to reduce voltage loss. Now the lowest voltage loss is below 0.4 V[37]. OSC performance will be further improved[38,39], thus paving the road to real commercialization.

    References

    [1] L Meng, Y Zhang et al. Organic and solution-processed tandem solar cells with 17.3% efficiency. Science, 361, 1094(2018).

    [2] Q Liu, Y Jiang, K Jin et al. 18% Efficiency organic solar cells. Sci Bull, 65, 272(2020).

    [3] Z Zheng, J Wang, P Bi et al. Tandem organic solar cell with 20.2% efficiency. Joule, 6, 171(2022).

    [4] Y Lin, J Wang, Z G Zhang et al. An Electron acceptor challenging fullerenes for efficient polymer solar cells. Adv Mater, 27, 1170(2015).

    [5] J Yuan, Y Zhang, L Zhou et al. Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule, 3, 1140(2019).

    [6] Y Liu, B Liu, C Q Ma et al. Recent progress in organic solar cells (Part I material science). Sci China Chem, 65, 224(2022).

    [7] Y Liu, B Liu, C Q Ma et al. Recent progress in organic solar cells (Part II device engineering). Sci China Chem, 65, 1457(2022).

    [8] K Jin, Z Xiao, L Ding. D18, an eximious solar polymer!. J Semicond, 42, 010502(2021).

    [9] X Meng, K Jin, Z Xiao et al. Side chain engineering on D18 polymers yields 18.74% power conversion efficiency. J Semicond, 42, 100501(2021).

    [10] J Qin, L Zhang, C Zuo et al. A chlorinated copolymer donor demonstrates a 18.13% power conversion efficiency. J Semicond, 42, 010501(2021).

    [11] X Meng, M Li, K Jin et al. A 4-arm small molecule acceptor with high photovoltaic performance. Angew Chem Int Ed, 61, e202207762(2022).

    [12] P Li, X Meng, K Jin et al. Banana-shaped electron acceptors with an electron-rich core fragment and 3D packing capability. Carbon Energy, 5, e250(2022).

    [13] K Jin, Z Ou, L Zhang et al. A chlorinated lactone polymer donor featuring high performance and low cost. J Semicond, 43, 050501(2022).

    [14] Y Tong, Z Xiao, X Du et al. Progress of the key materials for organic solar cells. Sci China Chem, 63, 758(2020).

    [15] W Shockley, H J Queisser. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys, 32, 510(1961).

    [16] L J A Koster, V D Mihailetchi, R Ramaker et al. Light intensity dependence of open-circuit voltage of polymer: fullerene solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 86, 123509(2005).

    [17] K Vandewal, K Tvingstedt, A Gadisa et al. On the origin of the open-circuit voltage of polymer–fullerene solar cells. Nat Mater, 8, 904(2009).

    [18] K Vandewal, K Tvingstedt, A Gadisa et al. Relating the open-circuit voltage to interface molecular properties of donor: acceptor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys Rev B, 81, 125204(2010).

    [19] Z Tang, B Liu, A Melianas et al. A new fullerene-free bulk-heterojunction system for efficient high-voltage and high-fill factor solution-processed organic photovoltaics. Adv Mater, 27, 1900(2015).

    [20] D Veldman, S C J Meskers, R A J Janssen. The energy of charge-transfer states in electron donor-acceptor blends: insight into the energy losses in organic solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 19, 1939(2009).

    [21] K Vandewal, J Widmer, T Heumueller et al. Increased open-circuit voltage of organic solar cells by reduced donor-acceptor interface area. Adv Mater, 26, 3839(2014).

    [22] M A Faist, T Kirchartz, W Gong et al. Competition between the charge transfer state and the singlet states of donor or acceptor limiting the efficiency in polymer: fullerene solar cells. J Am Chem Soc, 134, 685(2012).

    [23] J Song, L Zhu, C Li et al. High-efficiency organic solar cells with low voltage loss induced by solvent additive strategy. Matter, 4, 2542(2021).

    [24] D Qian, Z Zheng, H Yao et al. Design rules for minimizing voltage losses in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Nat Mater, 17, 703(2018).

    [25] K Vandewal. Interfacial charge transfer states in condensed phase systems. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 67, 113(2017).

    [26] Z Ma, W Sun, S Himmelberger et al. Structure–property relationships of oligothiophene–isoindigo polymers for efficient bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ Sci, 7, 361(2014).

    [27] J Benduhn, K Tvingstedt, F Piersimoni et al. Intrinsic non-radiative voltage losses in fullerene-based organic solar cells. Nat Energy, 2, 1(2017).

    [28] S Ullbrich, J Benduhn, X Jia et al. Emissive and charge-generating donor–acceptor interfaces for organic optoelectronics with low voltage losses. Nat Mater, 18, 459(2019).

    [29] J Wang, X Jiang, H Wu et al. Increasing donor-acceptor spacing for reduced voltage loss in organic solar cells. Nat Commun, 12, 6679(2021).

    [30] M Azzouzi, J Yan, T Kirchartz et al. Nonradiative energy losses in bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaics. Phys Rev X, 8, 031055(2018).

    [31] X K Chen, D Qian, Y Wang et al. A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. Nat Energy, 6, 799(2021).

    [32] F D Eisner, M Azzouzi, Z Fei et al. Hybridization of local exciton and charge-transfer states reduces nonradiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc, 141, 6362(2019).

    [33] X Duan, W Song, J Qiao et al. Ternary strategy enabling high-efficiency rigid and flexible organic solar cells with reduced non-radiative voltage loss. Energy Environ Sci, 15, 1563(2022).

    [34] B Lin, X Zhou, H Zhao et al. Balancing the pre-aggregation and crystallization kinetics enables high efficiency slot-die coated organic solar cells with reduced non-radiative recombination losses. Energy Environ Sci, 13, 2467(2020).

    [35] Z Zheng, M Li, Z Qin et al. Achieving small non-radiative energy loss through synergical non-fullerene electron acceptor selection and side chain engineering in benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]difuran polymer-based organic solar cells. J Mater Chem A, 9, 15798(2021).

    [36] S Liang, J Wang, Y Ouyang et al. Double-cable conjugated polymers with rigid phenyl linkers for single-component organic solar cells. Macromolecules, 55, 2517(2022).

    [37] H Liu, M Li, H Wu et al. Improving quantum efficiency in organic solar cells with a small energetic driving force. J Mater Chem A, 9, 19770(2021).

    [38] W Pan, Y Han, Z Wang et al. Over 1 cm2 flexible organic solar cells. J Semicond, 42, 050301(2021).

    [39] M Li, J Wang, L Ding et al. Large-area organic solar cells. J Semicond, 43, 060201(2022).

    Zheng Tang, Liming Ding. The voltage loss in organic solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(1): 010202
    Download Citation