• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1410005 (2021)
Lingfeng Wu1、**, Junbao Hu2、*, and Chang Yuan3
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong 523083, China
  • 2Institute of Micro-Nano Optoelectronics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
  • 3School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1410005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lingfeng Wu, Junbao Hu, Chang Yuan. Exposure Fusion Based on Improved Exposure Evaluation and Double Pyramids[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410005 Copy Citation Text show less
    EF flow chart of our method
    Fig. 1. EF flow chart of our method
    Fusion results of different methods on the house sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fig. 2. Fusion results of different methods on the house sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fusion results of different methods on the garage sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fig. 3. Fusion results of different methods on the garage sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fusion results of different methods on the memorial sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fig. 4. Fusion results of different methods on the memorial sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fusion results of different methods on the chandelier sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    Fig. 5. Fusion results of different methods on the chandelier sequence. (a) Original image; (b) WM method; (c) EE method; (d) LP method; (e) DL method; (f) EEF method; (g) our method
    SequenceMethodSFIEAGNIQESSEQ
    houseWM0.0447.4290.01423.53133.486
    EE0.0587.3310.03325.12432.325
    LP0.0857.4960.03623.14528.229
    DL0.0507.5860.01622.65230.999
    EEF0.0887.4890.04019.10325.739
    ours0.0977.5910.04221.89825.182
    garageWM0.0687.2670.01924.31227.861
    EE0.1077.1940.03430.62333.325
    LP0.1017.4180.03125.71821.325
    DL0.1097.3820.02828.35430.495
    EEF0.0937.4410.03225.60120.333
    ours0.1087.4560.03520.96820.739
    memorialWM0.0637.2160.02124.78229.673
    EE0.0926.8790.02927.67830.324
    LP0.0987.4270.03620.78322.354
    DL0.0687.2840.02321.38928.493
    EEF0.0957.3490.03322.60420.192
    ours0.1037.5260.03520.02719.334
    chandelierWM0.0257.2670.01524.31329.692
    EE0.0577.3810.01822.67231.324
    LP0.0567.3230.01123.78226.342
    DL0.0227.2540.00526.38228.953
    EEF0.0737.4420.02223.78924.372
    ours0.0787.3430.02921.28121.642
    Table 1. Objective evaluation indicators of different methods
    Lingfeng Wu, Junbao Hu, Chang Yuan. Exposure Fusion Based on Improved Exposure Evaluation and Double Pyramids[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410005
    Download Citation